Dowding: - sadly it all came to an end after the Peasant's Revolt and the feudal system started to die. Peasants had achieved more independance from their Lords, who reciprocated by abolishing all the benefits and replacing peasants much more agreeable and productive sheep (true apparently). It seems that Terry Jones confuses causes and consequenses - and understands not the least thing about economics. At least according to your quote - I have not seen the show.
Does he really believe that pesants benefitted from exploiting the Lords under the feudal system?
What are the population statistics of the period? I bet the population of England was exploding at the time of the feudal system dying. Somebody may feel sad that the population size was not held in check anymore by regular starvations and high child mortality but only if one is an inhuman monster or an environazi idiot.
How come after the productive farming land was diverted for use as pasture for wool-production, there was no shortage of food and population kept growing?
Could it be that improvments in farming technology made such production exessive? If so, any farming on such land would be waste of labor/resources that would not pay off. No wonder a sheep was more productive than a peasant farmer. At least sheep was producing something needed unlike farmer producing exess food.
What if the unproductive farmer kept farming, where would he sell his produce - the prices would be so low as to not cover the transport to the market. Such farmer would not be able to buy any tools of implements. He would not be able to enjoy division of labor in the society and sink even further into powerty. He was basically destined to ruin by exess food production.
And by the way, who bought all that wool (used for clothes if anyone wonders) produced profitably from millions of extra sheep? The king and lords? Somehow I do not think they lacked clothes before or even wore much wool.
I believe most of the newly-made wool clothes went to the millions of peope who were not considered wealthy - but who still have means to pay for them and keep sheepherding profitable.
Has anyone checked the numbers of employed in textile industry in England? The numbers of weavers jumped from hundreds to hundreds thousands in a course of decade. Who worked there? The same former peasants, switching from 18-hour back-breaking outdoor labor in harsh english climate with no guarantee of good harvest for indoor 10-12-14 hour non-physically exerting labor with payout guaranteed every week. Poor peasants. Could afford to have and fed and clothe more childen. They lived so much better under the feudal lord who owe them "benefits"...
miko