Originally posted by Elfie
You seem to think that the more guns that are available to law abiding citizens equates to more gun deaths. Interesting that here in the US the opposite is true.
I wasn't talking about the US. The article I posted is about Britain. I think I mentioned that in the thread title?
We don't have the insane situation whereby anyone can have a gun for no better a reason than the fact that he wants one. Read Nashwan's comment from 11:23pm. Your country has more than 100 times as many gun homicides as we do, but your population is only about 4½ times the size of ours. I think that speaks for itself. But just in case you still don't get it, let me spell it out: It's
because of our gun control laws, imperfect though things may be, that we still have fewer than 100 gun related homicides annually. And it's
because you guys allow so many guns into circulation that you have 10,000 gun related homicides annually.
If I was carrying a gun, and you tryed to mug me, dont you think you run a very high risk of being shot?
OK, consider this. The British police are routinely unarmed. And yet very few are killed in the line of duty. In 2003, only one was shot and killed (by an American fugitive of Florida justice). And yet, despite being heavily armed with all manner of guns, pepper sprays, tasers, the works - around 70 US police officers are killed in the line of duty every year. Go figure. And remember - these were trained guys. I rather think that the average gun toting civilian would be a somewhat softer target.
Elfie says he's gone, but I bet he comes back for more.