Originally posted by Fruda
And mietla... What exactly is your problem? You're not making yourself look very intelligent or friendly with those comments.
That was not my intent.
I was sarcastic and perhaps sounded to harsh, but the truth is that what you've said really rubbed be the wrong way.
Your dad is disabled. I'm really sorry to hear that and if this is the case he (your dad) fully deserves the help from the rest of us. My question is where you and your brother come into it. That is why I've asked about your age. If you and your brother are under age and can't work, I have no problem with wellfare benefits of your dad extending to you two, but if you are capable and legally employable, I take your statement as an insult.
You simply state that you CHOOSE not to work for $6/hours. As a matter of fact you seem to sound insulted that someone might even suggest it. That is what I found offensive.
No one has a right to live off of someone else's labor. If I see someone in need, I have no problem with lending a helping hand, but I want to be a judge whether the help is warranted. What I have a huge problem with is the omnipresent welfare state where people who work hard and produce are robbbed by the government and the fruits of their labor are distributed among the likes of your neighbour.
I'll give you the benefit of a doubt and let you rephrase/explain your statement:
"And I'm sure as hell not gonna work at Jack In The Box for $6 an hour. "
P.S. I can assure you I do know what it means to be poor. I consider myself lucky that I've never had to ask others (via the government extortion) to contribute to me and my family. I've worked two and sometimes three jobs to provide for my family, and maybe that why I find your refusal to work because you think that the welfare state can provide more offensive.