Originally posted by beet1e
Nope, I'm not nailed in a corner, tied to a tree or anything like that. The subject of this thread is about global warming, and US greenhouse gas emissions, which far exceed those of other leading economies. Mash tried to say the list I provided was BS, and Nashwan has since provided further proof that it isn't. And, in case you hadn't noticed, the problem has been discussed at a conference in Montreal just last week, with delegates from a multitude of countries present, the Kyoto treaty having been signed by 157 different countries. If global warming was a cyclic thing, why didn't they also have conferences in 1950, 1900, 1850, 1800...?
I can see why your handle is Jackall - because you know Jack all about anything. Anything knowledge you do have is out of date, but you keep stepping in it by trying to hold sway about matters you know nothing about, like various countries (which you have never visited eg. Britain, Singapore), certain books (which you have never read - eg. the Cynthia Lennon book) the British Monarchy (of which your perception is based on the status quo that might have existed in the 15th century) and now global warming, whose existence you deny. Ah wait, I can see why you don't believe it - it's because 100 years ago (which is current by your standards) global warming wasn't a problem.
But go ahead - bring up your goal line defence, like you always do when you're out of steam( which is often), and remind everyone about my ladyfriend. You know Jack all about her too, but it suits you to keep bringing it up because it's old information, which is all you ever have. Guess you never did catch the latest. It's here . Go ahead and read it...
... on second thoughts, don't bother. Making do with incomplete, inaccurate and out of date information is more your style. Why change the habits of a lifetime?
Gosh, I`m honored that you proved my point so well Beetle. When cornered, throw up a wall of text. Sort of like a smoke screen.
Me out of steam? I haven`t even stoked the boiler yet. No need to when dealing with one of your "Evil U.S. empire" threads. They are all alike. You put up something and thinly veil it, then you can`t stand it when nobody takes the bait, so you have a taste yourself, then spend a week trying to get the hook out of your own butt. You are rambling on about global warming and you`re saying that I`m out of date. Priceless. Just because you happen to stumble on some theoretical info and noticed it had something included that you could use to prove your never ending envy for the U.S. certainly doesn`t make it accurate or up to date. As a matter of fact global warming is totaly theoretical according to a lot of in the know people. Me? I could care less one way or the other until it is proven and then there will allready be a solution or won`t be. If there is a solution to it, it will be taken care of. If not, everyone will be dead. No worries either way.
No Beetle I didn`t miss the "latest". Matter of fact I still LMAO everytime I think of it. Did you really think you could pass that off? Brilliant.
Oh yea....and once again , I have no desire to go to Britain. Never have, never will. Boredom is..........well boring. You claim to have been to Singapore. It`s sort of funny that you know so little about the place, but beleive because you happned to visit there you are an authority.
On Lennon`s old lady`s book . Nope, never read it, never will. I had as soon drive a nail through my hand. What I said was to the effect that first wives are not usualy an unbiased opinion. Guess that went over your head, huh?
