Originally posted by easymo:
When I see a no smoking sign. I get the same feeling of outrage, at the unfairness of it, that those old signs gave me as a boy.
What is so unfair about them? Your smoking habit is really invasive towards the other people. It's not like they can ignore noxious fumes that you produce.
If someone stranger derived enjoyment from coming to you and poking you with his fist or a pole in your solar plexus hard enough to cause headache and nausea and cause admittedly minor but cumulative and lasting damage, you would not like it. But when you do it to others with poisonous chemical substances that cause fire alarms to go off and birds drop dead in their cages, that is somehow OK?
You are given the smoking areas that normal people know to keep away from, be happy with that.
There are quite a few limitations imposed on us for the sake of safety and well-being of others that affect really important aspects of our lifes, not just habits:
- shooting firearms on dedicated ranges, not in residential areas;
- driving cars in the street, not on the sidewalk - and even there in very specific ways (speed, direction);
- washing cars in rivers and disposing of oil and other pollutants there;
The lady had no more business interfering with your smoking in the designated area then she would trying to stop me from making noises with AK-47 on the range or driving my car in the street. If she could still fill the smoke where she sat, she had to take it with the restaurant owner or city officials for improper ventilation arrangements.
That does not mean that causing discomfort to others in public areas is your right.
BTW - I do not want to make an impression that I am against smoking. I think it is extremely beneficial to our society. I would never try to dissuade anyone who is not my friend or relative from it.
On more general topic of PC - it is in line with the tendency in US society over the last 50 years to codify human behavior in a set of laws, rules, regulations and customs that try to ensure total fairness and leave no place for uncertainity and desision.
That is not going to work any better then communism did.
A person is offencive when he/she wants to offend. It is perfectly possible to offend someone without using any words from the "list" - sometime just with a look or attitude.
If another person wants to take offence, he/she will find a pretext to interpret any action/inaction as offencive.
miko