Election in Iraq

[Sandman]

We don't need them for that.

[Holden McGroin]

Originally posted by Sandman
We don't need them for that.

Yeah, you probably can't get more than a quart or two from each one, and the energy cost of rendering is prohibitive.

[storch]

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Yeah, you probably can't get more than a quart or two from each one, and the energy cost of rendering is prohibitive.

I dunno they look pretty greasy to me.

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Yeah, you probably can't get more than a quart or two from each one, and the energy cost of rendering is prohibitive.

I expect the resident greenhouse gas  and oil expert to be along shortly to review the fallacy in such an operation. (He should be to the second chapter by now )

[Eagler]

Originally posted by storch
I dunno they look pretty greasy to me.

nah, the SE FL cuban pop would produce much more oil/better quality & would help the crime rate, prison crowding down there too...

[storch]

Originally posted by Eagler
nah, the SE FL cuban pop would produce much more oil/better quality & would help the crime rate, prison crowding down there too...

really?

[lada]

Originally posted by Sandman
$300+ Billion and 2000+ American lives. Hope is pretty ****ing expensive.

hope is free....

stupidity is an expensive article

let me add 30.000+ civilists

[lada]

Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
"Deserve" and "ready for" amount to the same thing in this case. His position is that the Iraqis should have remained under Saddam Hussien's tyranny. Justify THAT position and lower yourself to his level.

I just didnt get it... How it happen, that he was sutch a good ally 20 years ago, he was also permited to buy WMD from his allies..... and today .. today he is sutch a bad guy.

I dont understand even more, when i see "president" General Musharaf. He is exactly same kind of leader, as SH was, yet still ally of freedom spreading, terrorism annihilating US. He realy need old chity F16 to fight terrorist, so good ally will suply him those F16, even while he have nuclear weapons and not good (but improving) relations with his nuclear neigbour. While we can read, that dozen of people in Pakistan live in "bad condition" and on the next page we can read about Pakistania nuclear programme and on the third page we can read about antiterrorist campain in pakistan, nobody is wondering that he is General, who hijack the power 5 years ago.


Would you be so kind and "lower" me to the possition, where i can see, how "Saddam is bad and US good" and "good Musharaf with honest US ally" ?
Because right now i cant see diference between SH and GM well, while it seems to me, that we have some hypocrats on the scene.

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by lada

Would you be so kind and "lower" me to the possition/B]

Much lower  than you are and you can crawl under a snake.

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by lada
I just didnt get it... How it happen, that he was sutch a good ally 20 years ago, he was also permited to buy WMD from his allies..... and today .. today he is sutch a bad guy.

I dont understand even more, when i see "president" General Musharaf. He is exactly same kind of leader, as SH was, yet still ally of freedom spreading, terrorism annihilating US. He realy need old chity F16 to fight terrorist, so good ally will suply him those F16, even while he have nuclear weapons and not good (but improving) relations with his nuclear neigbour. While we can read, that dozen of people in Pakistan live in "bad condition" and on the next page we can read about Pakistania nuclear programme and on the third page we can read about antiterrorist campain in pakistan, nobody is wondering that he is General, who hijack the power 5 years ago.


Would you be so kind and "lower" me to the possition, where i can see, how "Saddam is bad and US good" and "good Musharaf with honest US ally" ?
Because right now i cant see diference between SH and GM well, while it seems to me, that we have some hypocrats on the scene.

I think you should read about what lead up to the Iran/Iraq war first. You seem either terribly uneducated or seriously misinformed.  Either that or you're an ex-communist.

[Yeager]

lada, its simple.  hussein zigged when he should have zagged.

[lada]

Originally posted by Ripsnort
I think you should read about what lead up to the Iran/Iraq war first. You seem either terribly uneducated or seriously misinformed.  Either that or you're an ex-communist.

Im not refering to Iran/Iraqi war. We both know, that Sadam wanted Iranian southwest oil fields. Most of those SW provinces has been inhabitted by Iranian Arabs at that time. Another important reason for SH was fear of islamic parties. Since it was clear, that Iran is powerful he were afraid of spreading of political islam from Iran to Iraq.

But back to my original theme... Would you be so kind and tell me, a little kommie, what makes Sadam bad and what makes general Musharraf good ?

[Gh0stFT]

Originally posted by lada
But back to my original theme... Would you be so kind and tell me, a little kommie, what makes Sadam bad and what makes general Musharraf good ?

lada can i add a question?
what makes germany & france bad and what makes the UK good?

thank you.

[lada]

Originally posted by Yeager
lada, its simple.  hussein zigged when he should have zagged.

i noted something like that.

But then you must agree, that all statements like "freedom for free and for all" is just political BS, isnt it ?

[lada]

Originally posted by Gh0stFT
lada can i add a question?
what makes germany & france bad and what makes the UK good?

thank you.

I dont consider germany and france as "bad".

Im speaking about real persons real events and this time.

What makes general Musharraf, who hijack power 5 years ago, so good ally ?
He have WMD, he developed them secretly, he is dictator, but still ally of US.

tell me... what kind of information do i miss to consider it normal ?
Because if i compare it to Saddam, it doesnt fit somehow.