Author Topic: Fighter's Glee  (Read 6166 times)

Offline Dead Man Flying

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6301
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #30 on: March 23, 2006, 06:59:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ChopSaw
I fail to see how this would be moving furballers to another arena or punishing them.  They would still have the current MA with all the settings they enjoy.  I'm certain they would not feel sad about losing those who want to play differently than they do.  In fact it would do much to eliminate the source of most of their whines.
[/b]

On the contrary, furballers and win the war folks rarely cross paths in the game already, but they do intermingle socially.  What you are proposing would fracture the Aces High community by forcing friends and squadmates to fly in different arenas.  The way to eliminate most of the whines is to simply stop whining.  A good way to start would be to stop posting threads like this one.

Quote
In point of fact it would allow for two different styles of play and enhance HTC's marketability.  If you get tired of one style, move to the other.  Nobody said furballers couldn't be in whichever arena they want to be in this scenario.


You can do that right now in one single arena without splitting up the community.  I fail to see how your proposal actually improves anything.

-- Todd/Leviathn

Offline ChopSaw

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #31 on: March 24, 2006, 01:28:23 AM »
Let's define a couple of terms for the convenience of discussion:
- Furballers = guys who fly in fighters.  They primarily enjoy shooting at other fighters, but also like to occasionally shoot at bombers, gv's and boats.  They don't really care too much about taking bases though many of them feel that's okay.  They don't like getting shot down.  Either by gv's or bombers.  They seem to feel the only one that should have a good chance of shooting them down is another fighter.  They don't like being inconvenienced by things like having their fuel reduced to 25%, the maps fields separated a decent distance, their HQ taken down (even partially) by a single bomber or even 4 formations of bombers, their fighter hangers taken down, their furball busted up by bombers operating as "flying flack platforms", heavy bombers which "fly too high and too fast" (their complaint, believe me), new bombers introduced (such as the B-29), etc, etc.  As a result they advocate (otherwise defined as a whine) and applaud changes to gv's and bombers which reduce the effectiveness of same.  Changes such as the remodeling of bomber gun convergence from AH1 to AH2, the remodeling of the way bombs drop from AH1 to AH2 and of course there's the way Ostwind and Bomber guns shake now.
- Win the War Folks (WWF's) = People that can be found in gv's, bombers, boats and even fighters.  These people like the multi dimensional aspects of strategy.  They like taking fields, winning the war and feeling like there's a chance for strategy and skill to win out over a larger number of players.  They would like to see things like the strategy system rebuilt to something like it's former interest level.  That would mean an HQ that can be taken down, fields back to the spacing they had in AH1 (spaced wider apart than they are now), the ability to reduce a fields fuel supply to 25%, a hardening of strat targets (ordnance, fuel and troops) to the point it requires ordnance (rockets, bombs or ground level size cannon) to destroy them, perhaps the addition of a real ammo bunker (one that is tied to the amount of ammunition a vehicle can up with), a return to an Ostwind model that doesn't make people sick, a return to effective guns on bombers, etc., etc.

Quote
Originally posted by Dead Man Flying
On the contrary, furballers and win the war folks rarely cross paths in the game already, but they do intermingle socially.  What you are proposing would fracture the Aces High community by forcing friends and squadmates to fly in different arenas.  The way to eliminate most of the whines is to simply stop whining.  A good way to start would be to stop posting threads like this one.

Rarely cross paths?  How is that possible?  We're in the same arena.  We fight each other (in friendly fashion and otherwise) all the time.  What you call social intermingling is perhaps what got the "all" channel reduced to a salute only channel and now has channel 200 heavily moderated.  The only intermingling I see in game is between like minded individuals with similar interests.  My proposal wouldn't change that.  I see a heck of a lot more intermingling on these threads than I do in game and that wouldn't be changed.  My proposal would force nobody to separate.  Not friends and especially not squad mates.  How many of the Blue Knights would want to go to the WWF arena?  If any separation occurred, it would be due to a persons own choice as to how they want to play.

Eliminate whines……that's interesting.  You mean like the whines of fighters claiming bomber guns or Ostwind guns are too good and should have something done to them to decrease their effectiveness?  You mean like the whines of fighter pilots who don't want to be bothered learning how to shoot bombers down and complain until the guns of the bombers are made less effective and then continue to complain about them because they're still getting shot down?  You mean the whines from fighter pilots who say bombers shouldn't be in formation, shouldn't have as much effect on the game as they did, shouldn't have even as much effect on the game as they do now, should have their fuel multiplier increased to force them to fly lower and slower, etc?  You mean whines like that?  Some of which HTC has acted upon and looks like they'll continue to act upon, eventually incorporating a good portion of all the whines fighters post.

The fact of the matter is HTC (HT, Pyro, Skuzzy, etc.) reads this bulletin board.  They look at and consider the ideas and desires of their customers.  More of their customers are furballers than WWF's.  HTC rightfully desires to retain as many customers as they can.  Evidently they feel the way to do this is to fulfill the desires of most of their customers.  This is their right.  It's their business and they can run it any way they wish.  Unfortunately this means a loss of diversity.  Loss of diversity most commonly results in eventual loss of customers.  My proposal would retain diversity, cost them little and in fact save them money by retaining customers and maybe even drawing more.  Right now there are a lot of WWF's losing interest in a game that seems to be emphasizing fighters more and more at the expense of everything else.  If those customers are lost, that would definitely fracture the AH community.  Doubt this?  Take a look at the thread "Headshake",                .  Read what Moil says.  Tell me that doesn't sound like the Ltar's are dissatisfied customers and then tell me what really dissatisfied customers do with their business.

If you feel that having two arena's (one for Furballers and one for WWF's) is going to fracture the AH community, then you should be worried about the eventual release of ToD.  That's going to be a separate arena.  I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess you're not worried about ToD, so why would you be worried about my proposal?

 
Quote
Originally posted by Dead Man Flying
You can do that right now in one single arena without splitting up the community.  I fail to see how your proposal actually improves anything.

While there are two styles of play in one arena, current set up favors one over the other and it looks like it's going to keep favoring it.  Two MA style arenas would allow for different setups so that both WWF's and Furballers could have what they want.

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #32 on: March 24, 2006, 02:09:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by ChopSaw
Last time I checked, the ack in Karelia stayed down for 10 to 15 minutes and there was ack hiding inside mountains that couldn't be shot.  Is that fixed then?  I did like a lot about Karelia.
The shore batteries were removed. :(  They couldn't fix them in time for the scenario.
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #33 on: March 24, 2006, 03:00:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
I used this, blowing it up and comparing it to contemporary maps:

I had something fairly worked out but that was on the machine my ex confiscated.
Check your PMs.
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline ChopSaw

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #34 on: March 24, 2006, 03:52:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Easyscor
The shore batteries were removed. :(  They couldn't fix them in time for the scenario.

Too bad, I liked them.  Hope you guys get them back.

What about the ack question, though?  Hiding in mountains?  Popping up in 10 or 15 minutes?

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #35 on: March 24, 2006, 04:37:13 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by ChopSaw
This leaves the question of whether it is appropriate or not.  Is it appropriate that the guns of a very large aircraft (a bomber) cause it to vibrate the same as those of a much lighter aircraft?  The only consideration I've ever heard for mounting fixed as opposed to flexible guns is the fixed ones are much lighter and take up less room.  Never heard anything about fixed vibrating less or flexible vibrating more.  Even if you take bombers out of the equation, how appropriate is it to be shaken so much by the coaxial gun on a multi ton Tiger.  Or how appropriate is it for the Ostwind, essentially a Panzer, to be shaken as much as the Yak when firing the same cannon?

Regardless of how you feel about bomber guns shaking or not, there is one clear result.  Bomber guns have had their effective range cut another 200.  As a result even less skill is required to down a bomber than before.  Fighters using lame attack vectors on bombers will still get shot down of course and that means they'll still whine about bomber guns being too good.  I can't help but wonder what the next degradation of bomber capability will be.  Small wonder many of the fighter crowd are gloating.  

Hopefully HTC will fix this mistake.  If so, sooner would be better than later.


     Apparently the fact that almost all bomber guns were either handheld
or in a small turret escapes you.  Fighter guns are generally mounted
much further away from the operator.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #36 on: March 24, 2006, 09:51:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by ChopSaw
Additionally, it might be helpful if you actually quoted someone rather than manufacturing quotes to suit yourself.


I did, try reading.  Just because the quotes are stupid, it does not mean someone did not write them.  The may sound stupid, but what do you expect?
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12398
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #37 on: March 24, 2006, 10:00:58 AM »
What I find quite imussing is the resons we do stuff. The shake was added because it was a previous oversight. Finaly had the time to get around to it.

2nd it was not added to make gunning more dificult. It was added soly to add some imersion. Just as you do not notice the shake in the fighters. After a few weeks of playing you will also not notice the shake in the gunners. But when a change happens, it just sticks out.


HiTech

Offline Pooface

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2520
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #38 on: March 24, 2006, 10:06:53 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
What I find quite imussing is the resons we do stuff. The shake was added because it was a previous oversight. Finaly had the time to get around to it.

2nd it was not added to make gunning more dificult. It was added soly to add some imersion. Just as you do not notice the shake in the fighters. After a few weeks of playing you will also not notice the shake in the gunners. But when a change happens, it just sticks out.


HiTech


yup. i dont understand why everyone makes such a fuss over it. personally, i like the gunshake, for that exact reason, more immersion, makes the game more fun.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #39 on: March 24, 2006, 11:33:40 AM »
Last night was the perfect example for me.  Lots of us 'furballers' fighting between the three fields in the center of the map.   100 other fields out there to capture.

Guys start upping buffs.  We asked them nicely to please not pork fightertown.  The response I got after asking one of them why he wants to pork fightertown was....wait for it.....'because I can."

It had nothing to do with strat, it was just to tick people off.  There was a steady procession of these guys continually buffing fightertown 'because they can'.

It had nothing to do with strat, winning the war, teamwork, etc.  Nothing.  It was just to irritate a bunch of people who were having fun and with fightertown, staying out of the way of the strat guys.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline ChopSaw

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #40 on: March 24, 2006, 11:39:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rino
Apparently the fact that almost all bomber guns were either handheld
or in a small turret escapes you.  Fighter guns are generally mounted
much further away from the operator.

And here I thought the guns on bombers were mounted in heavy motorized turrets.  Small light things were they?  Huh.  Even waist gunners had bracing for the guns.  Nobody can fire a .50 machine gun hand held.  At least not unless they want to spray the sky.

No comments on the Ostwind or coax of the Tiger?

Offline ChopSaw

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #41 on: March 24, 2006, 11:49:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by dedalos
I did, try reading.  Just because the quotes are stupid, it does not mean someone did not write them.  The may sound stupid, but what do you expect?

In the past you have taken substantial license, and considerable pleasure, in altering quotes on other threads.  There were no names associated with the quotes.  The quotes are not found on this thread.  The conclusion can only be you've manufactured them or at best paraphrased them from memory.  In any case, the response to your posting should be obvious to anyone who reads it.

Offline Dead Man Flying

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6301
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #42 on: March 24, 2006, 11:58:59 AM »
You make so many fundamentally wrong assumptions in your response, Chopsaw, that it is not even worth going over it to try point it all out.  Instead, I will make two key points that you should try absorb before posting again.

First, the arena is not "split" into furballers and war wagers.  Hardcore furballers and war wagers represent minorities of the overall game population, and most players do a little bit of everything.  Unfortunately, these two minorities often conflict because their goals fundamentally differ from one another, but everybody  else really doesn't care.

Second, what you propose fractures the community because it forces players to choose between two artificially-determined styles of play.  You would eliminate the social element of the game to satisfy some perceived cleavage in the player base.  Perish this notion immediately, because HiTech has repeatedly stated that he opposes splintering the community into different arenas.  It's not going to happen.

-- Todd/Leviathn

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10164
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #43 on: March 24, 2006, 12:17:56 PM »
Quote
More of their customers are furballers than WWF's.


HA!

Yeah, you've been around a long time.
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WORRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Fighter's Glee
« Reply #44 on: March 24, 2006, 12:33:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ChopSaw
In the past you have taken substantial license, and considerable pleasure, in altering quotes on other threads.  There were no names associated with the quotes.  The quotes are not found on this thread.  The conclusion can only be you've manufactured them or at best paraphrased them from memory.  In any case, the response to your posting should be obvious to anyone who reads it.


As I said.  Try reading.  The name is on the first quote.  The quotes are form MachNix.  Look it up.  In the past I have done what you said only with people I know and that I knew they would see the joke.  Who is making things up now ehh?  See, you are so tied up in your little furball whaaaas that you could not see something for what it was
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.