Author Topic: Atheism and the USA, followup  (Read 9384 times)

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #330 on: May 23, 2006, 01:46:38 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk

EDIT: Being agnostic I can admit that to being wrong. Can you?


But in this case of faith, you don't believe you're wrong. EVERYONE here believes they are right, hence the arguing.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #331 on: May 23, 2006, 02:08:24 PM »
SuburoS I'm new to posting to this  discussion so let me tell you my view.
I am agnostic  I don't know if god/ gods can or can't be proven.
To me this means Atheist might be right/wrong. Religious might be right/wrong. I don't know.
I don't know if i can make it  any simpler.

Quote
But in this case of faith, you don't believe you're wrong. EVERYONE here believes they are right, hence the arguing.


How can i be right/wrong if i don't know.
Believe me I can see the atheist side but can't embrace it. Why because I am not all knowing.
I see the religious side but can't embrace that. Because of some of the horrific things done in the name of god/gods.

You can tell me I'm a fence sitter if you want.  But when both sides have good/bad qualities I choose neither.

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #332 on: May 23, 2006, 02:26:24 PM »
I think this thread proves that athiests can't be trusted...  they are either lying to us or lying to themselves...

either way... not people you want to have to trust.

they somehow are unable to see how their faith based belief is the same as any other faith based belief.

They can't prove there is no god... they can't explain life and the universe and creation and they can't explain why every human group from the beggining of time has had a god.

If god is a credible and possible explantion for so many things then it is up to them to prove it is not possible or to come up with a better explantion or.... to be agnostic and scientific on the subjedt... to do otherwise is to have an agenda and/or be lying and therefore... not to be trusted... they let their emotions get in the way of clear thinking and won't admit it.

lazs

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #333 on: May 23, 2006, 02:35:17 PM »
Bronk,
Why do you lump all into one?
Yes there have been attrocities commited in the name of religion, but so have there been by nonreligious reasons.
There has been so much good done by the religion, by the truly religious, that to overlook the good because of the bad is not really fair to those following the true, righteous path.
If you believe in God or Supreme Being, please do not fear what others may think due to perceived association of some wrongdoings.
It matters not whether the idea of God can or cannot be proven. All that matters is if you believe.
I have too many friends that have had to "fall" back on their religious beliefs to help them out of desperate situations, so I know the value of what good religion can do.

I admit to not believing in God or possible existance. My participation is due to the fact I don't like having my character/honor questioned/attacked by those that know nothing about me. This has nothing to do of what other's think about God. I have and will always agree in their right to believe in their faith as truth to them.

This thread started out as Atheists the least trusted.
As an Atheist, I take exception to that.
Fair enough?
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #334 on: May 23, 2006, 02:42:08 PM »
No lazs, it is you that cannot differentiate the difference of burdon of proof using facts against faith. It will never be resolved.

Is it possible that I am right about the nonexistance of God?

To say "no" or "yes" to the question involves a paradox.

So which is it?
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #335 on: May 23, 2006, 02:46:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SaburoS
Interesting some of the "Agnostics" on this BBS. You claim that you don't see the proof either way of God's existance, so it is a possibility of the Atheist being right. There is only one truth. We all choose what we accept it as is.


And if you accept the one truth to be one way or the other on the existance of god, you have taken an illogical step.  A leap of faith as it were.

If you do not take that step and prefer to stop at the logical conclusion of the argument, that is the concept is unproven, then you choose an agnostic viewpoint.

It is intresting parallel that exist between your statement "There is only one truth" and the theologian professing his is the "one true faith"

In physics, there are times when there seem to be several truths.  The concept of wave particle duality says that photons work like a waves, yet they work like particles, yet they work like waves. 2 truths apparently both correct.

Thru which of the two slits does the photon pass? Why the single photon passed thru both slits simultaneously.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #336 on: May 23, 2006, 02:50:14 PM »
So is it faith in God that it happens or will science eventually find the answer?
One truth. Some haven't been found yet. We will in time provided we survive as a human species.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #337 on: May 23, 2006, 02:51:15 PM »
Lazs, I respect your right to have religious beliefs.  It's my opinion that it's not the place of any man to tell another what he may or may not think.  I'm saddened that you do not share this conviction, and that you question my character and call me a liar because I don't agree with you.

Bronk: How could I be wrong?  I have a _lack of belief_ about god, as in, I fail to believe that he exists.  How can a lack of a belief be wrong?  The most you can say is that it's just...  missing.

I wrote in an earlier message the technical differentiation between the terms atheist and agnostic and how they are actually two sides of a coin, not opposed to each other.  If you wish to challenge my assertions, then just do so directly please instead of just saying "you are dishonest" or whatnot.
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #338 on: May 23, 2006, 02:53:22 PM »
Of course it is possible that you are correct in your faith.... I simply have my own faith that contradicts yours.

The difference between us is that you will not admit that yours is a faith based belief much less.....the possibility that you are wrong...  

If you do admit that there is that possibility that you are wrong then there is indeed a paradox but..... it is not mine...

the expression "hoisted on your own petard" comes to mind.

The intolerance is the key to not being trusted along with the inability to admit you have a strange faith based belief.

If you claim that you believe in god but only because of personal faith.... No problem.... If you profess a lack of faith and say that you are agnostic on the subject.... no problem...

But if you say that you are just being logical and that athiesm is not faith based, well..... then you have a problem.  

Whenever someone says they are an athiest my first reaction it to laugh at the whole paradox of the thing.... my next reaction is to not trust em..  My last is to dismiss them as not being serious thinkers.

lazs

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #339 on: May 23, 2006, 02:53:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SaburoS
One truth. Some haven't been found yet. We will in time provided we survive as a human species.


You say "one truth", yet the very next word is plural.:)
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #340 on: May 23, 2006, 02:57:52 PM »
Chair, you don't believe that there is a god.

What proof do you have that you are correct? None.

So you're taking your position on "faith" that you are correct.

It's funny itself and funnier that you don't see it.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #341 on: May 23, 2006, 03:15:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
You say "one truth", yet the very next word is plural.:)


Sure. Most issues are different. I believe there to be only one truth for each. Case by case basis.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #342 on: May 23, 2006, 03:33:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin

Thru which of the two slits does the photon pass? Why the single photon passed thru both slits simultaneously.


Only Holden could EVER get away with talkin dirty in a thread on faith and religion.

:aok
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Simaril

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #343 on: May 23, 2006, 03:49:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SaburoS


...snip....

Now those arguments of faith fall apart under scrutiny.
Creationism (uh-oh, another 1000 post thread right there only to get locked in the end).
Evolution (see above).
Offspring mutation (I mean if we all come from the same relatives)?
Flooding all of Earth killing off all life outside of Noah's Ark by raining constantly for 40 days/nights. Really?
How old is the Earth?
Our solar system?
Our Universe?
Parting of the Red Sea?

That's a start.


....snip...



Saburo, just a thought, hopefully directed to an open mind.

it seems to me that you are trying to disprove something by at first assuming it does not exist; That in essence claims of supernatural activity cannot be true because there can't be anything that transcends the natural world we observe.

Here's what I mean.

I'd like to do a thought experiment...and lets leave the word "god" out. Instead, purely for the sake of the thought experiment, lets imagine a transdimensional entity that exists in a hgher dimensional state than our own. This entity would seem "god-like" to us, being a couple orders of magnitude more advanced than the first european explorers appeared to stone age new worlders.

Take that being that exists in the 6th dimension or something,  and allow it to interact with our 3 dimensional world. Its very presence would strain the 3D universe we live in; and if it acted on this universe, IT WOULD APPEAR INEXPLICABLE BY ANY NATURAL LAW of our existance - -almost by definition. And those explicable, but extradimensional, interactions would look every bit like miracles.

So if you posit that such a being existed, would miracles be any big deal at all???

Now, a step further. Imagine how incomprehensible our world would seem to something truly 2 dimensional, that has no framework to understand the concept of "depth". Or, closer to home, imagine describing a sunset to a man born blind? How could you even start? Even if you did an OK job, could it even appraoch the reality?

Take that idea and apply it to our 6th Dimensional visitor. Would you really expect everything that entity told us about itself and the dimensional existance beyond our own, to be completely straightforward and direct? In fact, I'd argue that any such explanation for what's beyond our universe had BETTER stretch our minds some, because if it doesnt it begins to sound suspiciously like an invention from within this framework.




Now I'm not going to claim that this makes any proof of anything I believe, because of course it doesn't. But your implication, that people of faith must in essence turn their minds off to reality, does not bear scrutiny.

There are certainly those who never get past "God said it, I believe it, and that settles it for me." Some figuratively plug their ears and hum to drown out what doesnt fit what they want to believe.

But the fact that many you see do not operate on the same cognitive plane as you DOES NOT mean that faith itself is ignorance. I'd challenge you to honestly wrestle with the deep thought of C.S. Lewis' Mere Christianity, or G.K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy. If you're up to it, dive into the philosophical works of Augustine of Hippo -- though his intellect so far exceeds my capacity that I needed support materials (like a Augustinian philosophy lecture series -- from a secular college, btw) to grasp the depth of what he was saying.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2006, 03:52:56 PM by Simaril »
Maturity is knowing that I've been an idiot in the past.
Wisdom is realizing I will be an idiot in the future.
Common sense is trying to not be an idiot right now

"Social Fads are for sheeple." - Meatwad

Offline AVRO1

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #344 on: May 23, 2006, 03:51:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2 I think this thread proves that athiests can't be trusted...  they are either lying to us or lying to themselves...
either way... not people you want to have to trust.


Fallacious argument. Thrustworthiness as nothing to do with the group(s) you belong too. Everyone makes their own decision regarding truth.

Quote
They can't prove there is no god... they can't explain life and the universe and creation and they can't explain why every human group from the beggining of time has had a god.


Since humans are psychologically similar it seems logical to me that they used similar means to explain similar things in different societies.

There is also this problem : If god created the universe, who created god ?

Quote
they somehow are unable to see how their faith based belief is the same as any other faith based belief.


I am no more right then anyone else, I simply believe what I see.