Author Topic: take the challenge and speak the blasphemy (Read 4032 times)

storch · « **Reply #180 on:** January 02, 2007, 05:44:06 PM »

I'm a tyrant I own the company.

BOOMHOWR · « **Reply #181 on:** January 02, 2007, 06:08:23 PM »

I'm a bum, I stole this internet access. If she would avoid posting crap she wouldn't get labeled. Problem solved.

Now, I have to go chase down my house. Damn wind blew it away.

dhaus · « **Reply #182 on:** January 02, 2007, 07:06:47 PM »

Those of you who want me to bow down, or state you're in management, please return to the first page and sign up for the blasphemy bit - you're already there. Sorry you want to label her boomhowr, and also sorry your house got blown away.

BOOMHOWR · « **Reply #183 on:** January 02, 2007, 07:11:54 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by dhaus
Those of you who want me to bow down, or state you're in management, please return to the first page and sign up for the blasphemy bit - you're already there. Sorry you want to label her boomhowr, and also sorry your house got blown away.

yeah, now I'll have to go wait by the local best buy and hope somebody throws the box away for their big screen tv.

And by the way, I did speak the blasphemy. And she's still a tardette.

mosgood · « **Reply #184 on:** January 02, 2007, 07:51:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by BOOMHOWR
And she's still a tardette.

I don't agree with her but there's no call for the labeling and name calling like this. It demeans you.

BOOMHOWR · « **Reply #185 on:** January 02, 2007, 08:06:52 PM »

Oh please, calling someone a tard is hardly labeling anyone. And for what its worth, I don't see "tard" as being offensive or a label for that matter.

Hell, some people should wear it with pride. Dlamb, and all the other great tards. She's just a questionable tard.

storch · « **Reply #186 on:** January 02, 2007, 08:09:13 PM »

tardlingette?

BOOMHOWR · « **Reply #187 on:** January 02, 2007, 08:35:35 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by storch
tardlingette?

That has a nice ring to it, i'll let the guy who's name is not important enough for me to remember that posted above me to decide which one fits better.

-edit- scrolled up after I posted. Dhaus is his name -edit-

dmf · « **Reply #188 on:** January 05, 2007, 06:31:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by BOOMHOWR
I'm a bum, I stole this internet access. If she would avoid posting crap she wouldn't get labeled. Problem solved.

Now, I have to go chase down my house. Damn wind blew it away.

I'm posting crap? read over your posts and look for any interesting content.

Silat · « **Reply #189 on:** January 05, 2007, 06:41:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FLS

You think Communist Party members were church members?

Religion serves a need, isn't that why every society developed a religion?

Isn't communism like a religion for some people?

Isn't liberalism like a religion for some people?

Irrational beliefs taken on faith and imposed on other people, isn't that you Silat?

You think Communist Party members were church members?
<>

Religion serves a need, isn't that why every society developed a religion?
<>

Isn't communism like a religion for some people?
<>

Isn't liberalism like a religion for some people?
<Libs and Neocons can and do belong to churches. Jew ,Christian or otherwise>>

Irrational beliefs taken on faith and imposed on other people, isn't that you Silat?
<>

FLS · « **Reply #190 on:** January 05, 2007, 06:56:23 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Silat
You think Communist Party members were church members?
<>

Religion serves a need, isn't that why every society developed a religion?
<>

Isn't communism like a religion for some people?
<>

Isn't liberalism like a religion for some people?
<Libs and Neocons can and do belong to churches. Jew ,Christian or otherwise>>

Irrational beliefs taken on faith and imposed on other people, isn't that you Silat?
<>

Being like a religion doesn't mean being a religion. That's why it says "like".

So you agree your liberalism is an irrational belief taken on faith but you disagree that you in any way impose it on people?

Benny Moore · « **Reply #191 on:** January 06, 2007, 12:49:20 AM »

To be a Christian is, in a nutshell, to follow the teachings of Christ. Those who call themselves Christians but do not follow the teachings of Jesus are liars. Attributing the evil actions of these liars to true Christians or the teachings of Jesus is either ignorant or dishonest.

Jesus said that his followers will be known by their "fruit" or "produce." If you read up on what Jesus actually taught, it will become immediately apparent that the Crusaders, the Iquisitors, and the Puritans (at least the notorious Puritans) were not Christians as they claimed, for they did not follow the teachings of Jesus. Attributing the works of these false men to Jesus or his followers is, again, wrong.

No one following the teachings of Jesus made this world a worse place in doing so. And no one making this world a worse place was following the teachings of Jesus when he did it.

lazs2 · « **Reply #192 on:** January 05, 2007, 09:37:55 AM »

I think benny pretty much summed it up. I think a lot of the hate we see here for christians is a result of so called christians themselves not acting like.... well... christians.

I don't think any religion should be based on arrogance and human personalities.

lazs

BOOMHOWR · « **Reply #193 on:** January 05, 2007, 07:31:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by dmf
I'm posting crap? read over your posts and look for any interesting content.

Yeah, you were posting crap. And I was posting crap to point out your crap.
I know I post crap. Acceptance is the first step...

dmf · « **Reply #194 on:** January 05, 2007, 08:42:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by BOOMHOWR
Yeah, you were posting crap. And I was posting crap to point out your crap.
I know I post crap. Acceptance is the first step...

So I should take it that you've accepted the fact that your stuff is crap, and my crap is stuff?
Leave me alone or I'll turn you into a toad