Author Topic: gun control...  (Read 6157 times)

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
gun control...
« Reply #60 on: April 16, 2007, 04:32:33 PM »
Short of posting armed guards in every classroom, which would be vehemently opposed by many in our society, what other options are there?

Arm the teachers?  Israel does it.  Mass shootings in that country have been a very real possibility ever since it was created in 1948.  Terrorists know that the teachers and all school personnel have military training in the use of weapons, and therefore there is scant hope of carrying out a mass public shooting of any kind.......so they strap explosives to their bodies and blow themselves up.   The effect is the same.

But again, as Yeager pointed out in an earlier thread on this subject, I can't see the arming of teachers happening in this country.

Also, this is not the bloodiest mass murder of school children and teachers in the nation's history.  Many years ago, a psychopath loaded up a truck with explosives and drove it to a school where he had had an altercation with the superintendent.  He blew it up on the street next to the school and killed, if memory serves, around 90 people.

Nutcases will find a way.  All we can do is take the appropriate counter-measures.

Offline Hornet33

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
gun control...
« Reply #61 on: April 16, 2007, 06:03:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
bluedog, it is against the LAW to bring a gun on campus.  It is also against the law to kill people. The shooter broke at least two laws, how many more laws would have stopped what happened?

criminals don't obey the law, thats why we call them criminals.


You might find this interesting.


Last year

Virginia Tech's ban on guns may draw legal fire
Some people question whether the university has the authority to ban the carrying of firearms. How about you?
By Kevin Miller
381-1676

BLACKSBURG - Virginia Tech's recent action against a student caught carrying a gun to class could draw unwanted attention from groups already angry about firearms restrictions on public college campuses.

University officials confirmed that, earlier this semester, campus police approached a student found to be carrying a concealed handgun to class. The unnamed student was not charged with any crimes because he holds a state-issued permit allowing him to carry a concealed gun. But the student could face disciplinary action from the university for violating its policy prohibiting "unauthorized possession, storage or control" of firearms on campus.

Tech spokesman Larry Hincker declined to release the student's name or specifics of the incident, citing rules protecting student confidentiality. But Hincker said Tech's ban on guns dates back several decades.

Students who violate the school policy could be called before the university's internal judicial affairs system, which has wide discretion in handing down penalties ranging from a reprimand to expulsion.

"I think it's fair to say that we believe guns don't belong in the classroom," Hincker said. "In an academic environment, we believe you should be free from fear."

Most public colleges in Virginia ban or restrict guns on campus. But the root of that authority is murky, according to some observers.

Virginia law already prohibits students or visitors from carrying guns onto the grounds of public and private K-12 schools. The state also prohibits concealed weapons in courthouses, places of worship during a service, jails and on any private property where the owner has posted a "no guns" notice. State employees are barred from possessing guns while at work unless needed for their job.

But Virginia code is silent on guns and public colleges. And two bills seeking to give college governing boards the authority to regulate firearms on campus died in committee during this year's General Assembly session.

David Briggman, a resident of Keezletown in Rockingham County, has made it his personal mission to challenge state colleges' authority to enact tougher gun restrictions than the state.

Briggman, who is a former police officer, said he forced Blue Ridge Community College to allow him to carry a gun onto campus while a student. And he sued James Madison University over its ban on concealed weapons even among permit holders. While JMU's policy still stands, Briggman said he has been told by campus police officials that they will not arrest visitors who carry a gun legally.

"It's extremely easy to challenge university policy by looking at ... whether they are given the statutory authority to regulate firearms on campus, and of course, they're not," Briggman said Tuesday.

Hincker, meanwhile, said it is not unusual for colleges to have more restrictive policies than the state. As an example, Hincker said certain chemicals and explosives that are legal on the outside are prohibited in the classroom or in dormitories for safety reasons.

"We think we have the right to adhere to and enforce that policy because, in the end, we think it's a common-sense policy for the protection of students, staff and faculty as well as guests and visitors," Hincker said.

Virginia Tech also has the backing of the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police. In a policy position paper dated April 1, association executive director Dana Schrad wrote that the presence of guns on college campuses "adds a dangerous element to an environment in which alcohol is a compounding factor." Students should not have to be concerned about guns on campus, Schrad wrote.

"The excellent reputation of Virginia's colleges and universities depends in part on the public's belief that they are sending their college-age children to safe environments," the policy paper reads.

At least one attorney who represents college students would like to see the concealed-carry permit issue clarified.

John Robertson, the Student Legal Services attorney at Tech, said he's heard differing interpretations of the policy at Tech. Robertson, whose position is funded through the Student Government Association's budget, does not represent students in disputes with the university but offers free legal advice and services to students on civil and criminal matters.

Robertson said he would like to see either a court or the state Attorney General's Office resolve the matter. As for a university's refusal to honor a concealed-carry permit, Robertson added: "I am dubious that one particular arm of the state can do so without a particular statute."

Hincker acknowledged that the concealed guns issue had "never been tested" and that the university could be opening itself up to legal action.

"But we stand by the policy unequivocally," Hincker said............
AHII Con 2006, HiTech, "This game is all about pissing off the other guy!!"

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13919
gun control...
« Reply #62 on: April 16, 2007, 06:27:53 PM »
As I believe this will be determined later on, it's not the ones who have a CCW permit that "create fear", it will be the ones who decide that they won't follow any laws and decide to kill wherever they want to. Going to a location where all weapons are banned merely provides a safer area for the killer to do their crime.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
gun control...
« Reply #63 on: April 16, 2007, 07:21:40 PM »
The sad thing about this tragedy, is that there will be alotta debating, alotta things said in Congress, with them ultimately hoping that this will just "fade away"....

The current makeup of our government,with congress being controlled by a Democratic majority, might wind up seeing Gun legislation in Virginia that makes California look like Arizona.

This is what They think will make our schools safer...

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
gun control...
« Reply #64 on: April 17, 2007, 08:25:39 AM »
It has been known here for a very long time that the cities that are to be avoided the most are those where citizens can't have guns.

It seems pretty obvious that it is now a good idea to avoid schools where guns are banned.  

Gun bans seem to attract the wolves.   If I had a child murdered at that school who knew how to use a firearm and would have had one except for the ban on them...  I would want someones head.

What gives us the right to disarm our people and allow this kind of slaughter?

The greater good?  

lazs

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
gun control...
« Reply #65 on: April 17, 2007, 09:18:18 AM »
lazs
the days of the wild wild west are over
if more ppl carried, there would be more instances of gun abuse. Maybe not the 30+ this tradegy has seen but the 1's and 2's would add up to more than the 30+ over time. Do you think only sane, stable ppl have permits?
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
gun control...
« Reply #66 on: April 17, 2007, 09:27:16 AM »
Eagler, not counting the cost of the weapon, practice, or ammunition, it costs around $450 around here to get a permit. I don't think any unstable person is going to bother with spending that amount of money, nor are they going to sit through a minimum of 8 hours of class, never mind go to some government agency and wait in line for hours to get a permit. Currently, it appears that the percentage of legal CCW permit holders who have been found to have illegally used their weapons is minuscule, probably less than 0.0001% or so.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
gun control...
« Reply #67 on: April 17, 2007, 09:28:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
lazs
the days of the wild wild west are over
if more ppl carried, there would be more instances of gun abuse. Maybe not the 30+ this tradegy has seen but the 1's and 2's would add up to more than the 30+ over time. Do you think only sane, stable ppl have permits?


 For the most part only sane stable people have permits. That's what the FBI & state police background checks are for. Mix that with training & you have a stable, trained, armed defender. The person may not do any defending, they may flee or pull their weapon & freeze. But I'd rather take my chances in that scenario than a completely unarmed one, we've seen what happens in that situation.

 On topic, that video was funny. I'm going to use a Sword, no reloading. The zombies will make easy targets.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13919
gun control...
« Reply #68 on: April 17, 2007, 10:22:27 AM »
Eagler,

It's not the ones that go through the training and other hoops to get a CCW that are the propblem. That has been shown in the states that have enacted CCW procedures. As always it's the ones, for whatever reason have no fear of the rule of law that decide to do this type of thing. If they are willing to break the law regarding murder they are willing to break any law and certainly not be bound by bothering to get the CCW.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12795
gun control...
« Reply #69 on: April 17, 2007, 10:33:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler

if more ppl carried, there would be more instances of gun abuse.


Come on Eagler.:rolleyes:

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
gun control...
« Reply #70 on: April 17, 2007, 10:42:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
lazs
the days of the wild wild west are over
if more ppl carried, there would be more instances of gun abuse. Maybe not the 30+ this tradegy has seen but the 1's and 2's would add up to more than the 30+ over time. Do you think only sane, stable ppl have permits?


History has proven you wrong, even in your own state.

Florida issued "Do not retreat" laws.  People said it was going to be the wild wild west again with guns shooting off at every corner on the streets.

Crime and gun violence has gone down.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
gun control...
« Reply #71 on: April 17, 2007, 12:45:29 PM »
"live by the sword, die by the sword"
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
gun control...
« Reply #72 on: April 17, 2007, 03:07:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
"live by the sword, die by the sword"


Heart disease out kills guns in America... what ...50 to 1?

Live by the cheese, die by the cheese.

"The great state of Vermont will not apologise for its cheese!"
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Samiam

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 498
gun control...
« Reply #73 on: April 17, 2007, 06:35:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bluedog
I dunno John, maybe one banning the manufacture of handguns might have some effect 50 years or so down the track, but short of that I have no idea what the answer to the problem is.
Clearly a problem does exist though.


The only problem that exists is that life is messy, filled with risk, and wackos sometimes go wacko. You cannot eliminate danger, you cannot stop people from occasionally going wacko, and you cannot control what they do when they go wacko.

Rough math based on reports yesterday - ~20 notable school shootings in 40 years resulting in about 200 deaths and let's say another 200 injured. Surely this is a high estimate, but let's go with it. That's 10 shooting deaths per year in a country with about 50 million students in middle school, high school, and college (probably more).  That's 10/50,000,000 * 12 years in school * 2 (I have two kids) = ~.0005% chance that one of my children will be killed or hurt in a school shooting incident.

It is not rational to think that any amount of gun control will reduce those odds in any observable way no matter how much time you give it.

BTW - using same math, and assuming a 9/11 scale event happened every year killing 3,000 people in a country with 300,000,000 people, that's .001% chance of me being killed by terrorists in any year as I live my daily life. Probably much less since I don't often travel to LA, NYC or Chicago. I'll take those odds. Repeal the patriot act.

Let us be free!

Offline Warspawn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 647
gun control...
« Reply #74 on: April 17, 2007, 07:06:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
"live by the sword, die by the sword"



If you don't have a sword to defend yourself...virtually guaranteed to die to someone else's sword.  Carry a sharper sword and know how to use it.  Make the other bastage die by the sword first.

One thing that's been proven over the last 10,000 years or so is that mankind is a predatory animal, always seeking to dominate or eliminate competition.  Whether it's with pointy sticks, handguns or nuclear weapons, it really doesn't matter.

The only time this doesn't work so well, is when the other side has the same firepower or intimidating force as the one contemplating aggression.  It worked with MAD for years, and it certainly applies in the Virginia Tech incident.  If one teacher or student in this kid's path had exercised their right to bear arms, lives could have been saved.  One thing is VERY clear here:

Virginia Tech's policy to eliminate adult students' and teachers' rights to legally bear arms on school grounds didn't work.  The kid ignored the rules and slaughtered people following this policy.

Happens over and over again even in countries which severely limit their citizen's ability to defend theirselves.  Well...one might say happens especially there.  People who follow the laws restricting defense become the victims, while criminals disregard those laws.

Sigh...one person legally armed when this nut started firing would have put him down like a mad dog.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2007, 07:23:47 PM by Warspawn »
Purple haze all in my brain
Lately things just don't seem the same
Actin' funny, but I don't know why

'Scuse me while I kiss the sky                 
                                                 --J. Hendrix