Author Topic: General Climate Discussion  (Read 93645 times)

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #300 on: November 04, 2007, 11:16:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund

Wonder what produces more?
See Rule #4

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12803
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #301 on: November 04, 2007, 11:17:45 AM »
I think we generate more steam and hot air on this bbs.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8269
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #302 on: November 04, 2007, 11:19:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund


I mean you were joking right?
Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #303 on: November 04, 2007, 11:30:23 AM »
Raised atmospheric temperature increases the capacity to carry water in the vapourised form. Nothing new there....
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #304 on: November 04, 2007, 03:14:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
Wonder what produces more?


In a delicate ecobalance all it takes is extra. But, I've said this before and those that don't want to change lifestyle for the sake of the coming generations just don't want to understand it. :D

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12803
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #305 on: November 04, 2007, 03:53:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
In a delicate ecobalance all it takes is extra. But, I've said this before and those that don't want to change lifestyle for the sake of the coming generations just don't want to understand it. :D


It is your contention that our ecobalance is delicate. Not everyone agrees.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #306 on: November 04, 2007, 04:12:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
It is your contention that our ecobalance is delicate. Not everyone agrees.


You state the obvious. But a conservative person always "errs" on the side that provides the better safety margin. Believing that flooring the accelerator because you don't believe the cliff ends ahead, even when you realize it's a foggy night, leads me to believe you're not qualified to select the car's driver, much less drive it yourself.

I advocate caution while unknowns exist. You, yourself, admit unknowns exist, right?

That's our political difference on the subject, I reckon. No offense. *ShruG*

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12803
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #307 on: November 04, 2007, 04:42:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
You state the obvious. But a conservative person always "errs" on the side that provides the better safety margin. Believing that flooring the accelerator because you don't believe the cliff ends ahead, even when you realize it's a foggy night, leads me to believe you're not qualified to select the car's driver, much less drive it yourself.

I advocate caution while unknowns exist. You, yourself, admit unknowns exist, right?

That's our political difference on the subject, I reckon. No offense. *ShruG*


You advocate what exactly?
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #308 on: November 04, 2007, 05:11:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
You advocate what exactly?


Emission reduction while we continue to study effect. Simple. :)

Offline soda72

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5201
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #309 on: November 04, 2007, 07:54:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Emission reduction limiting Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness while we continue to study effect. Simple.


fixed

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #310 on: November 04, 2007, 07:57:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by soda72
fixed


You spelled reinterpreted (to justify feeling threatened) wrong. :aok

Sup? :D

Offline soda72

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5201
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #311 on: November 04, 2007, 08:04:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
You spelled reinterpreted (to justify feeling threatened) wrong. :aok

Sup? :D


Just catching up on the bbs....

I see you've been busy....
:D

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #312 on: November 04, 2007, 08:08:43 PM »
Just practicing my skills at impressing, influencing and winning over. ;)

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12803
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #313 on: November 05, 2007, 08:10:18 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Emission reduction while we continue to study effect. Simple. :)


Who isn't for emission reduction? Study is good if you aren't trying to further a political agenda with the results.

Have you taken any steps to reduce emissions personally?
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #314 on: November 05, 2007, 08:19:35 AM »
hortlund... what data are you using that says that we are a major..or even minor.. contributor to water vapor in the atmosphere?

And even more telling.. are you now off of co2 and onto man made water vapor as the cause of this so called "MMGW"?

lazs