Author Topic: General Climate Discussion  (Read 93649 times)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #345 on: November 06, 2007, 03:46:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund




But that line before 1800  is the natural cycle and it's mechanisms, and by your own testimony, that is irrelevant.  So once again, how do you know that we are changing anything?
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #346 on: November 06, 2007, 03:50:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
But that line before 100 years ago is the natural cycle and it's mechanisms, and by your own testimony, that is irrelevant.  So once again, how do you know that we are changing anything?


Notice any difference in that line? Spot the difference between pre-industrial age and now?

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #347 on: November 06, 2007, 03:58:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund
Notice any difference in that line? Spot the difference between pre-industrial age and now?


As soon as you admit that we must compare the data to a relevant baseline I will.  

But as you say, "It is completely irrelevant what the vast majority of the atmosphere consists of, it is completely irrelevant that the oceans send huge amounts of water vapor into the atmosphere, those are all part of the natural cycle." so by your definition, the line before 1800, which is the line of natural cycle, cannot be used in our discussion.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #348 on: November 06, 2007, 04:29:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
As soon as you admit that we must compare the data to a relevant baseline I will.  

But as you say, "It is completely irrelevant what the vast majority of the atmosphere consists of, it is completely irrelevant that the oceans send huge amounts of water vapor into the atmosphere, those are all part of the natural cycle." so by your definition, the line before 1800, which is the line of natural cycle, cannot be used in our discussion.


:aok

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #349 on: November 06, 2007, 04:44:37 AM »
So does :aok mean we can discuss natural data or is it still irrelevant?
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #350 on: November 06, 2007, 04:46:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Ok so we will outlaw Bean comsumption.

Problem solved LOL
Lightning strikes too?
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #351 on: November 06, 2007, 06:13:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Lightning strikes too?


Ban em.
Make a law against them.
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #352 on: November 06, 2007, 06:15:58 AM »
Light spirited as it is, you can't.
But it's possible to lock you up though :D
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #353 on: November 06, 2007, 06:42:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
Light spirited as it is, you can't.


I don`t know why you would say that. You can ban and make laws against anything. Just because it won`t work has never stood in the way before.
If you are going to back something that will screw yourself, you might as well go for the gold.

Old saying: Anyone can pee on the floor, but it takes a real hero to take a crap on the ceiling. :)
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #354 on: November 06, 2007, 08:26:27 AM »
oh.. now this is getting rich!!!

do a search for water vapor and greenhouse gas.. all the articles will tell you that water vapor is the biggest and that it is not affected by man.   the lefty ones will tell you how much more important co2 is.

Not one of these scientists.. not the UN report... nada.. say that man is changing water vapor... if you do a search you will find only one article by one scientist that says that we may be changing water vapor  you will find hundreds that say we can't... it balances itself.   You will even find a couple that say that the meteorite in russia in 1906 changed the amount of water vapor in our atmosphere.

So where are the numbers and charts to dazzle us peasants hortlund?   Do you really think that we are changing water vapor?

May be.... so far tho.. no one is saying that or providing data on how much...  

But say we are..  What would we have to do to stop it?   Water vapor credits?   Maybe a movie?   get the UN to dummy up the old report or just say......

"never mind.. we were wrong on the co2 thing... it is water vapor but it is still your fault"

LOL... no matter what.. it is our fault I guess.   but so far.. we have no solutions do we?   If we all slit our throats.. the earth would still heat and cool.. another meteorite could hit a week after we all suicided...

So what is the solution to the whole "man made water vapor" catastrohe?

and..  have you finally given up on the c02 as the world ender scenario?

It was getting kinda worn and silly.

lazs

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #355 on: November 06, 2007, 09:20:19 AM »
When you start your biggest bike Lazs, it is not the force of your hand that does it really, but turning the key or slamming down the pedal is enough to get other and much stronger things going. That is the theory behind CO2's effect. If it works itself into accelerated warming then you enter the doomsday zone. Not what I belive in, but I rather put my money on quite a naughty climate. Anyway, the doomsday scene,  In one culture, opening Pandora's box. In another releasing the wolf named Fenrir.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #356 on: November 06, 2007, 10:13:23 AM »
An interesting take on the genesis of the MMGW scare...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml;jsessionid=0GN3K55AD1OR1QFIQMFSFFWAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/earth/2007/11/04/eaclimate104.xml

BTW, I think this thread has set a personal record for the most replies to one started by me.:aok
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #357 on: November 06, 2007, 10:37:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
  Maybe a movie?  

lazs


LMAO

Gore`s next option.
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #358 on: November 06, 2007, 12:43:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
Do you really think that we are changing water vapor?


Wtf, just how stupid are you anyway? I just explained to you how water vapor is created during fossil fuel combustion, and here you are completely ignoring that post and asking me again to explain how man is creating water vapor? You are one stupid mother f ucker.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #359 on: November 06, 2007, 12:45:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2

and..  have you finally given up on the c02 as the world ender scenario?

It was getting kinda worn and silly.

lazs


The atmosphere consists of a mix of gasses, the balance of these gasses determines how much heat from the sun that will be trapped in the atmosphere. The amount of clouds and ice also determines how much heat from the sun that will bounce back into space.

What we are doing is changing the balance of gas in the atmosphere, this change causes more heat to be trapped, and the temperature rises. As the temperature rises, the oceans emit more water vapor into the atmosphere, changing the balance yet more. As the temperature rises the ices melt, making the reflective surface smaller, thus letting more heat get trapped in the atmosphere. As the temperature rises, areas that were once frozen melts, and these melting areas release more gas into the atmosphere, methane, which is a very very evil greenhouse gas...causing yet more heat to be trapped in the atmosphere.

All of this is basic science, and it is plain for everyone with half a brain to see. Yet you guys sit there, trying to shove your heads deeper into the sand (did I say sand? I meant "your a ss").

It is completely irrelevant what the vast majority of the atmosphere consists of, it is completely irrelevant that the oceans send huge amounts of water vapor into the atmosphere, those are all part of the natural cycle. What IS relevant is that MAN is changing the balance of those gasses in the atmosphere, and because of that, we are changing the amount of heat trapped in the atmosphere.
[/color]
But you wont understand that, because you dont WANT to understand that. How difficult it is to make a man understand something, when his salary or his percieved lifestyle depends on him not understanding it.