The ISSUE is the fact she think ONLY abstinence policy should be taught in school. So with that said it makes the fact that even her own daughter couldn't be abstinent a very REAL issue and shows just how wrong the women is on the subject.
Here, I'll type slowly for you.
The fact she thinks ONLY abstinence policy should be taught in school coupled with the fact that Bristol is pregnant out of wedlock DOES NOT make Sarah a hypocrite.
There is nothing one person can do that can make another person a hypocrite. See the definition of hypocrite.
There, that should handle the hypocrite part.
Now, the fact that even her own daughter couldn't be abstinent DOES NOT show just how wrong the women is on the subject.
What it shows is that Bristol chose to ignore the abstinence approach that her mother favors. That is all it shows. Nothing more, nothing less. When you finally have children that have gone through puberty, you will realize this.
The obvious counter to your argument would be if I gave an example of a teenager that got knocked up after going through an extensive sex education course in school which was reinforced by her parents, both of whom were strong believers in sex education.
Now we both know that there are unwed mothers that went through parentally supported sex education. Does that mean the parents were totally wrong supporting sex education?
Duh... obviously not. It means the teenager ignored her parent's & school's instructions and got knocked up.
Again, after you have teenagers you will probably understand this implicitly.
Tell me, when you reached puberty, did you have sex ed? What was your parent's position on premarital sex? Did you go ahead and get laid anyway? Did you ever have unprotected premarital sex?
I bet we ALL know the answer to that one because just about everyone of us did the same thing.
This is a non-issue for that very reason.
