The 'larger' kid doesn't need to have a sense of proportion,
Get outta here... Doesn't need to have a sense of proportion? Well then, let's just bust his legs and cave his skull in while we're at it.
That little mosquito was no threat whatsoever. Proof: Big guy took at least one punch without even moving. Just give the little guy a heavy slap to the face. If he comes back, another big slap, and keep going till the little guy gets it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIW2d-QfwaAhe was defending himself and he isn't reported to be a professional combatant that can properly gauge his strength or ability to injure.
cf "objective assessment" in retrospect, not as some pontification
Also, before this occurs, this kid stands there and takes repeated physical abuse and you don't call that restraint?
That's restraint. A potentially ER worthy pile driver isn't restraint.
You would lose the case in court, without a doubt.
What does that have to do with anything? The vagaries of modern day American courts are meaningless to the realities of physiological trauma and street fighting tactics.
Are you kidding me? Did you get dropped on your head as a child? HE WALKED AWAY.
He walked away after pile driving a sorry excuse for a pre-teen skeleton into the ground.
If he wanted to he could have gotten on top of that kid and beat his face in, did he? NO.
Non sequitur.
He was trying to avoid the fight. That was shoving, cussing at him, and hit him multiple times. He was defending himself.
That doesn't change anything about the fact that his "defense" was excessive.
Are you kidding me? He never threw a punch, he picked him up and through him to the ground. It wasn't even a pile driver! In self defense you do what you need to to stop the situation and get away which is exactly what that kid did. And by the way, HE IS A KID!
I'm not kidding you. You're out of touch with reality if you think that a sloppy pile driver on concrete on a 3 years younger super featherweight, by someone with just a build advantage, in response to punches that aren't anywhere near dangerous, isn't grossly excessive. And I'm no PC nanny. I grew up taking and giving in fist fights, it's why I can't do sports today (bad joints), and I'll be first to admit that I miss fighting, and probably I'll argue that used in moderation it's good for kids. But that pile driver wasn't "restraint".
And I don't give a rat's what courts say, that is probably one of the weakest arguments you could probably make. The justice system has absolutely nothing to do with the physiology and tactics of martial arts.
You think he should be thinking in his head, while the other kid is smacking the crap out of him, how hurt he would be if he tries to defend himself?
Sure, he "didn't know what he was doing". I could buy that. But that doesn't make the exact thing that he did right.
By the way, you said self defense would be neutralizing the other kid? He looked neutralized to me!
No kidding. Let's for a second change a single thing here. Let's take the exact same move and instead of towards the ground, let's apply a one-gravity-equivalent acceleration horizontally instead of vertically; that is, let's make the big kid toss the small kid against the wall, head first, hard enough that he gets the same dislocations and whatever else he got. I'm curious if you'd deny it's excessive -- now that I think about it I expect you will.