Zero problems.
Because I'm racing I will be installing a 1 piece aluminum driveshaft and safety loop. They're both at home waiting for me to get the car in the air which I'll do when I'm back from vacation sometime after 12/4. On the road now and have been for a week, wrapping up today.
For some reason instead of using a solid driveshaft like the GTs Ford used a two piece that's not really a two piece. There isn't a third universal joint but it's two pieces mated together which isn't as strong as it could be. In fact a few of them have exploded at 118mph or so on Dynos and a buddy's broke while he was on a road trip in VT. Ford replaced it under warranty but I'm being proactive for my own sake and putting a Shaftmasters in because I'm racing. Safety first.
Drop top fits fine. I'm crossing the stripe at 100mph and no weird noises or buzzes. In fact the whole car doesn't have any rattles from various pieces not fitting together which I'm very happy with.
The only thing I'm not happy with is my 60' time. I'd like to get it to 2.0x and my best so far is 2.26. Still playing with how to launch but I'm not home enough to get to the track that often.
Sometime in the spring I'll get another set of wheels and a set of brembo or v6 perf package take off tires for track days up at Pocono Raceway. I'm excited to get on a road course and I'm lining up 3-4 club days this year as they don't require roll bars in convertibles. Fresh tires, brakes and rotors are required to get through tech and I'm already excited about that.
the two piece driveshaft was something i meant to include in my questions. i was curious about that. i don't really see a reason for it either, although i do believe that the camaro is also using a two piece. i'll be keeping that in mind, as i don't feel like sitting on the side of the road waiting for a tow truck as i go find the various pieces of my driveshaft, nor do i feel like losing a race due to one breaking.
60' times may be a bit hard, as you've got a 2.78? rear? if it helps any, when i used to run my 83 bone stock(it was WAY slower than yours) the best launch i came up with, was to basically sidestep the clutch at about 2700rpm, but no immediate throttle. i let it bog on the line, then once she was rolling, i was able to hammer it. any higher rpm, cooked the tires, and throttle at that rpm cooked the tires, and any lower launch, she just didn't get moving. that car had a 3.23(was the highest ford offered in those).
i'm glad to hear abuot the fitment. the main reason i had asked, is due to fords past history with mustang convertibles. i may have mentioned it before. i believe that the s197 chassis is the first mustang convertible to be built entirely by ford. previously, they'd build the car as a coupe, ship it out, the company that did them would hack the roof off, add supports, put the convertible in, and then ship the soon to be leaking/rattling/poorly fitting convertible. i had read good about these, and now i know from someone i know and trust that they really did improve them.
i had talked with a service manager at ford down the street.....according to him, the wheels on my car are the only ones besides the shelby or boss302 wheels(from ford) that'll clear the brembo calipers, so be careful when you upgrade them. i'm not sure though, as although he generally sounded like he knew his stuff, i thought i caught a bit of that tone that bs'ers get.
like you, with the way these things handle, i can't friggin WAIT till spring and the possibility of some track days. i'll be trying for milleville frst, as it's closer. also, know what i found out dood? the SCCA runs autocrosses down at the old bader field.
it's ashame dicho doesn't live closer.....the three of us, we could probably talk mypsie into joining us too.....could almost have our own little AH road racing group.