Convergence settings are overrated imo.
I used to agree, and if you mean in terms of small changes like say, point convergence at 325 versus 300, I agree completely.
However recently I thought I'd experiment a bit and shortened my convergence on my .50 cals from 450 to 300. I had it at 450 in case I wanted to reach out to 800-1000 to get someone to turn and felt the damage was good enough in closer. I wanted the ability to have best accuracy and damage as they're pulling away from me at 400 icon.
The reason I brought the convergence in is I've found myself lately not doing any shooting outside of icon 600 because I've come to the realization the .50s out there haven't got near the punch they do in close, and unless you're getting a newish guy to turn, it's not worth wasting the bullets.
I have always done most of my shooting in between 400 and 200 icon. My ability to hit hasn't changed in my opinion, but subjectively it feels like when I hit something now, I am way more likely to knock something off. Snapshots feel like they work much better now too.
I believe the explanation for this is that it's on wing mounted .50s, the type of gun setup that benefits the most from hitting at convergence versus all other gun setups. If I flew nose mounted stuff primarily I doubt the difference would be as noticable.
I believe the answer for convergence is truly 'where you do most of your shooting at.'
Wiley.