Originally posted by MANDOBLE
While you are running away or while you are traveling at mach 2 you ARE "N O T" FIGHTING. Is that so difficult to understand????
[/B]
If you are running from a fight, you don't get it anyway. Why am I even talking to you about "fighting" when it's clear that you don't understand how to use the 190D9's strengths appropriately? Speed is an asset IN a fight. Let me repeat that... speed is an asset
IN IN IN IN IN IN IN[/i] a fight, not just an asset when running from one. Fighting does not just equal stallfighting, though stallfighting is a subset of fighting. The Spit outturns you? You blow on past, retain your E, extend a bit, reverse, and set him up using angles fighting or BnZ. If things don't work out, you can continue to do this unscathed until either he's dead or you decide to exit the fight.
In any case I insist, you have not experience flying them or flying against them to say a single word about 190s except that u outurns any of them with your SpitV and any of them are faster than your SpitV, Shane has even less. And a "laboratory" environment like H2H is not MA.
[/B]
Wait a second... so just earlier you stated that the MA is 100% dogfighting. So I go to a H2H "laboratory" where it's 100% dogfighting, and suddenly now that's not a valid exercise. Of course it's valid, and the planes mixing it up there represented a nice cross-section of arena planes. The Dora matched up nicely.
I also have more than enough experience with 190s to know how they stack up to each other and to other planes in the general planeset. It's silly that you keep continuing this line of argument, when your own statements concerning anything but a 190 have been so riddled with inaccuracies, generalizations, and biases (remember how Spits guarantee the player a 0.0050 K/T? That one was a hoot).
Perhaps this is new to you, but top speed is not a factor to be able to disengange and, of course, is not a factor to decide whether to engange or not. Top speed dictates very little if u compare it with acceleration and altitude.
Perhaps it's news to you, but top speed is an enormous factor in choosing engagements. I can't believe you'd actually argue otherwise when evidence in the form of planes like the P-51 contradict you. I do agree that acceleration and altitude can matter, but they are no more or less important than speed. The La5 outaccelerates just about every plane in AH including the La-7, but it's relatively slower and handles very poorly when super fast. As such, I don't consider the La5 as survivable as the D9, which features reasonable middle and high speed handling, a high top end, good acceleration, etc etc.
-- Todd/Leviathn