Originally posted by Udie
WHEW now that is refreshing Thanks for posting this. After a quick read I don't see anything that I would contradict in your post RAM You are right about TODAY's world. One thing to remember about our world today is that there are a LOT of people/countries out there that HATE the USA and what we stand for. They will use any tool at their disposal to get at us and hurt us. This would be a HUGE tool for them that IMO we can not let them have. Remember not one month after 9/11 the USA was voted off the UN human rights commitee and SYRIA was voted on in our place. That right there tells me all I need to know.
Hummmm well, as far as I can say, the international court will have power over international issues as Crimes against the humanity, international terrorism, international criminal organizations, etc.
Not over internal issues, which will still be treated by each nation by itself. I don't see, either, where is sovereignty abdicated in this thing. Its HIGHLY unlikely that any kind of genocide ,crime against the humanity ,etc, will happen in the USA, so in fact you're not giving up anything at all in that sense.
I simply can't see the reason of the dispute here. With this international court there would be no arguing at all about human rights, US treatment of al-qaeda prisoners, etc...in fact I'd say it would be better for the international image of USA.
But that's just me
Like I said earlier, this may be arrogant and I'm sorry if it is, adopt our constitution and laws and maybe we can talk about this international court. As it stands now it's no good from our (USA) viewpoint. Why should we be forced to agree to something we disagree with? Where's the democracy in that?
Udie, the US constitution has little to do with this AFAIK, as the laws of any of our countries. We're talking about an INTERNATIONAL jury which is intended to deal with INTERNATIONAL crimes...at least that is the way I understand it. Maybe I'm wrong, tho.
so you'll keep on judging your people in your country, we do judge our people in ours, etc...
the only instance of people sent to this new court would be someone who's commited crimes against the humanity or who's part of an international terrorist organization...which as far as concerns me SHOULD be trialled by an international court anyway.
and for the record I'm sorry about Franco......
Past things belong to the past. Only a stupid would have a real problem with US supporting Franco 27 years ago. I got some family lost to franquism, but that is past, and today's USA is different from that USA, as today's Spain is different from that Spain
.