Originally posted by Nash:
Complain about it loud and long enough, and everyone flocks to it because gee - it must be some ultimate magical plane, et voila, it gets perked. It aint gonna end with the Chog, I reckon... What's the next target, fellas?
Most probable: N1K2.
Not that I say it should or not should be perked, its that it is seen in dozens right now (At least I am seeing them a lot lately). And after (if) the Chog is perked, the N1K2 will be the plane of choice for most of the Quakedweebs in the Main. Maybe I am wrong, but with so much niks on the main it can be the next choice.
If that happens, and after it...mostly none. All the rest of the planes have really serious drawbacks to level their pros.
Spit IXs are slower and have 2 cannons (hispanos,still, but only 2 and with little ammo clip).
Fw190s are hard to fly and survive in. The A8 is a pig and the A5 is as fast as a Spit IX (so, it is damned slow).
Typhoons have 4 hispanos.Still doesnt turn too well, and if the torque comes back and if the Roll thing gets fixed (take a look into the Rollrate thread in Aircraft&Vehicles forum) it wont be easy to fight in, either.
P51s are fast but cant turn.
Fw190D9 will be faster, but will turn even less.
Me109G10 requres really good shooting and pacience. It will be never a massively used plane.
I still think that even if the Chog is erased from the CV planeset it will be massively used. The problem is not the plane itself, the problem is the 4 turbolasers it carries, they allow for gameish flying and tactics, mostly like the N1K2 has with its amazing E-keeping, fast turning and 4 cannons (the problem is not the cannon itself, its that it is on board of a thing that can bear them on target on half-a-second)...
So the plane of choice for most of the quakekids on the Main arena is the flying lazerbird, followed by the N1K2 "Japanese spinning wonder"

. If those guys can't fly none of those two ,they will have to grab a normal plane and ACTUALLY learn flying ACM and Skills.
I dont think that is bad for AH. And I am sincere.
[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 01-06-2001).]