Author Topic: Terrorist enjoy the Phillipines cowardice (Read 1739 times)

NUKE · « **Reply #60 on:** July 21, 2004, 11:59:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
I mean the face to face negotiation of terms with Iran regarding American hostages, quite possibly extending their incarceration, in order to gain advantage in a Presidential race, all behind a sitting President's back.

That kind.

What do you have to back that up? From what I understand, after Reagan was elected, Haig expressed to Iran that if the hostages were not released, there was going to be real hell to pay, no more games.

What "deal" was made? Here is the deal: "release the hostaged or else" No more to it than that. No "deal"

NUKE · « **Reply #61 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:00:47 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Been done.... lots.... olden.

Go dig it up, find something wrong with what I'm saying then come back and tell me why.

It'll be a total retread, but I'm feeling charitable.

You are confusing the issue with "Iran Contra"

Nash · « **Reply #62 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:01:52 AM »

Neg., but it leads there....

NUKE · « **Reply #63 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:02:53 AM »

tell me the basics in your own words, I'll go from there....

Nash · « **Reply #64 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:03:37 AM »

NUKE · « **Reply #65 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:06:28 AM »

Reagan could not represent the USA until after he was elected . Very simple. And what exactly did Reagan use Iran for in order to influence the election?

Nash · « **Reply #66 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:09:28 AM »

Nuke - go learn about it first then come at me with what you've learned.

I'm not gonna play tit for tat in order that a picture begins to emerge for you. Waste of time.

NUKE · « **Reply #67 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:15:37 AM »

LOL Nash, what a puss out. I'm not playing tit for tat, you are. You answer my questions with "go learn about it" instead of offering anything.

I offer this: Reagan could not legally negotiate with or represent the US in talks with any foreign government while he was running for President.

So I again ask you, what negotiations did Reagan have with Iran regarding the hostages ( or anything) while he was running for President?

You are the one who claims negotiations took place, you are the one who needs to back that up.

Nash · « **Reply #68 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:17:57 AM »

Jesse Jackson goes to foreign countries to negotiate on behalf of the US....

mkay?

Do you have a prollem with what I said? If so, what exactly is it?

NUKE · « **Reply #69 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:18:49 AM »

oh Nash, what how exactly did Reagan exploit Iran to his advantage during the campaign?

Nash · « **Reply #70 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:20:13 AM »

You tell me.

Give me just a suspicion that you're versed enough in this to warrant the retread.

NUKE · « **Reply #71 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:23:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
You tell me.

Give me just a suspicion that you're versed enough in this to warrant the retread.

That's a dumb comment. I have told you I do not know what you are talking about...isn't that the point of my trying to get you to elaborate?

Just blurt it out in your own words and put me to shame.

AKIron · « **Reply #72 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:25:21 AM »

The Philippines owe little and have no significant allegiance to the US. I don't fault them for pulling out when the going got too tough. Those opposed to US (and coalition) action in Iraq will fight us as long as they are able and I'm pretty sure they realize that at least the US (and likely others) will stay the course regardless of their actions. At least until next January.

Nash · « **Reply #73 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:26:06 AM »

I already did.

I said everything I wanted to say.

You want to tell me I'm wrong.... but you don't seem to have a single clue about any of it.

So why am I wrong?

Because it makes you feel bad?

I have no idea where you're coming from.

NUKE · « **Reply #74 on:** July 22, 2004, 12:28:36 AM »

Quote

Wotev. Negotiated with terrorists. Struck a deal. Both got what they wanted,

And you said this but cant even list one thing that backs it up. What negotiations took place? What did Iran get ?

Quote

the face to face negotiation of terms with Iran regarding American hostages, quite possibly extending their incarceration, in order to gain advantage in a Presidential race, all behind a sitting President's back.

and this, yet nothing....not even your own words to back it up