Author Topic: More Gun control???  (Read 6906 times)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
More Gun control???
« Reply #135 on: August 15, 2004, 08:09:43 AM »
No problem...protection from one's self is the purpose of  government regulation!
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #136 on: August 15, 2004, 09:31:51 AM »
beetle said.."Bermuda where Curval lives is a better example of a society free from gun crime - and how to achieve that. Indeed, Bermuda has a freedom which America does not - freedom from gun crime. I would much rather have freedom of that sort than the freedom to purchase a piece of hardware... "

yes... the tiny little island of england is now to large to make gun laws work... u have to use an even smaller little island to make gun control work.... perhaps a prison would be a good example of gun control working.  

Yes... yu are relatively free of guns in england... especialy if you are one of the ruling class in the neighborhoods that are avoided by criminals who prey on the rest of the tthe "subjects"... yes... you are free to be a victim in england.  

So just how tiny does a place have to be to make gun control work?   bermuda seems to be about max size unless yu populate an island with nothing but japs.

beetle says that losing your right to defend yourself from the tyranny of others from within and without is simply losing your rigtht to "purchase a piece of hardware."   this is about like saying that losing the internet is like losing your freedom to purchase a piece of hardware.

lazs

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #137 on: August 15, 2004, 09:38:14 AM »
awmac... your equation is wrong... or not complete.   columbine would only have happened if the bad guys were the only ones in the school that were armed.

"Guns + Insecure High School Kids + Black Trench Coats + Anger = Colombine"

In order to be more accurate....it should have to read..

 "Guns in the hands of insecure high school kids and no one else+ Insecure High School Kids + Black Trench Coats + Anger = Colombine"

without them being the only ones armed... they simply remain.... angry and cowardly.

lazs

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
More Gun control???
« Reply #138 on: August 15, 2004, 01:04:06 PM »
err ahh Laz ..... ahhh hmmm

C. Heston said much the same thing and then the media jumped on it.

According to certain reports put out by the media at the time .....

There was an armed guard at the school :(

(wonder why?  wonder what his actual purpose was supposed to be?  Armed guards at highschools?????)

The guard and the kids actually exchanged fire at one point :(

The guard ran away and called law enforcement in :(

Apparently the guard had never been in a firefight :(

The pucker factor was abit more then he was perhaps prepared for, hmmm thinkin about it, it was probably pretty high for someone that thought they were only dealing with kids/teens.
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline cpxxx

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2707
More Gun control???
« Reply #139 on: August 15, 2004, 01:16:24 PM »
As I've tried to get across before the gun argument is a red herring.  Yes there is a problem with handgun accidents. Sure ban handguns and that problem goes away. But it won't stop gun crime.  Everyone is skirting around the real issue.

Guns are not the real problem. Despite too strict gun laws in this country there are apparently 230,000 guns in the hand of gun owners. With a population 3.5 million that is a lot of firearms per head. One for every thirteen people. Yet gun crime is largely restricted to a few criminal gangs with illegal or stolen weapons and is rare enough that the uniformed police are still unarmed and don't even wear body armour.  With that number of weapons in circulation you might think lots of people die in gun accidents here. But they don't.  The same is true of most of the United States. So guns are not the problem.

The problem is the perception that you need a gun for protection

People like Beetle focussing on guns completely miss the point. The fact that Lazs recently bought several Makarov pistols for his family for protection point to the fact he, probably rightly feels they need the protection the guns give.  That's the issue in my opinion, despite the fact that in most of America crime is minimal and even non existent many people have such fear that they own guns for protection.  

The issue is that fear. If it's genuine then the reasons should be addressed. If it's not genuine then why the fear?

Scapegoating guns for the problems of society doesn't cut it. There are bigger issues here crime whether with a gun or not  is a sympton not a cause.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2004, 01:18:41 PM by cpxxx »

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
More Gun control???
« Reply #140 on: August 15, 2004, 01:18:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
yes... the tiny little island of england is now to large to make gun laws work... u have to use an even smaller little island to make gun control work.... perhaps a prison would be a good example of gun control working.  
Our gun control does work; I never said it worked perfectly. Imperfect though it may be, gun homicides have never exceeded 100 in any calendar year - about 1% of the typical US total.

I mentioned Bermuda because, according to Curval, the gun control does work - perfectly. So I was citing Bermuda as a textbook example.
Quote
HMcG - No problem...protection from one's self is the purpose of government regulation!
Thanks for the advice - glad it worked for you!

Offline demaw1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
More Gun control???
« Reply #141 on: August 15, 2004, 01:20:18 PM »
Aw mack........columbine...

   I for one am so glad those black trench coated kids at columbine had guns.

  Beetle,   your gun laws dont work, 33000 deaths from a place with no guns and a population as small as yours .... wow great laws.

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
More Gun control???
« Reply #142 on: August 15, 2004, 02:22:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by demaw1
Beetle,   your gun laws dont work, 33000 deaths from a place with no guns and a population as small as yours .... wow great laws.
Incorrect. What's your source? In most years out of the last 10 that I have checked, there have been about 750 homicides, of which about 60 are gun related. From where do you get 33,000?

Offline demaw1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
More Gun control???
« Reply #143 on: August 15, 2004, 02:36:28 PM »
Cpxxx.....fear.....and the need for 2nd adm.

  I dont think lazs purchased the weapons because of fear, but a true desire to protect his family.

  Ireland may have less reason to need to protect family,for many reasons.

The overriding reason for the second admendment is best said by thomas jefferson,president of the united states of america.  paraphasing....It is the right, no, it is the duty of every american to own and know how to use their weapon of choice. It will be incombant upon each citizen to rise up and overthrow this goverment if it were to become dictoral in nature.

That is the main reason for 2nd amendment.  I believe that in the last 10 ,12 years the fact that so many are armed has stop this goverment from doing some things it has wanted. I also believe the same holds true of our past.

 That is as true for today as it was for yesterday.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2004, 02:39:00 PM by demaw1 »

Offline demaw1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
More Gun control???
« Reply #144 on: August 15, 2004, 02:40:48 PM »
Beetle my source is nashwan.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #145 on: August 15, 2004, 03:51:28 PM »
I purchased the makarovs because they were a good deal and a couple of my family members could appreciate em... plus... they are very cool cold war history.   Well made and fun to shoot.   Both family members enjoy plinking and shooting at targets and will enjoy them.... the guns also provide for a sense of security real or imagined.

beetle... you are victims... your crime rate has skyrocketed... not yours personaly... your little islands, since your draconian gun ban...  We simply don't like being victims like you apparently do.   Ireland does not have the same view of your benevolent government that you do as cpx points out.

I don't know what our government would do if we were unarmed subjects instead of citizens... I am in no hurry to find out.

my younger years were spent with the dregs of society.. I live a different life now in a neighborhood where being attacked is allmost inconcievable... but...  I know the same people (or their younger ilk) I used to hang out with still exist ..  and I am habituated..  My nature is to be friendly but cautious.   I know what fear is... I can't say that fear enters into it these days.   Habit and caution are about it.

course... there are allways the zombies.  

I like guns... criminals and tyrants don't want me to have em... women and neurotics and foreigners don't want me to have em.  

too bad for them.

I can't belive that murderers would cease being murderers if somehow all the guns disapeared.   If there were a reduction in homicides I douht that it would be enough to notice... what we would notice was a huge increase in crime against persons.   like england we would have burglars break into our homes when we were at home.   like england we would have to be told that resisting criminals is illegal... helping someonme being victimized would have to be illegal.

no thanks

lazs

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #146 on: August 15, 2004, 04:01:48 PM »
The white homicide rate in America is about 5000 a year.   in england it is between 750 and a thousand a year but... with a population of 1/6th ours...

your rate is just as high... sure ... they are useing other weapons generally but... so what?   you are as bad as we are..

you gave up your human rights for nothing... worse... you have made things much worse... Our crime rate continues to fall while yours skyrockets.

lazs

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
More Gun control???
« Reply #147 on: August 15, 2004, 05:00:47 PM »
Lazs - one thing you should know is that Ireland (where cpx is from) and the UK (which includes England) are two separate EU member states. "Our" government does not govern Ireland. The reason for our crime rate has nothing to do with guns. We are currently governed by Tony Blair and his cronies, and they have stipulated that our total prison population must never exceed 80,000. Because of that, some criminals are having to be released too early, and lots of people who should go to prison do not. Guns are nothing to do with it.

And I haven't given anything up.

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
More Gun control???
« Reply #148 on: August 15, 2004, 05:25:18 PM »
Quote
Beetle my source is nashwan.

Huh?

I don't think I said anything about the UK's rate, did I? Apart from saying about 70 people were shot dead in England and Wales last year.

Certainly our homicide rate, which includes negligent homicide, which the US figures don't, is around 700 - 1000 a year.

Down slightly last year, and the firearms homicide rate was down by 18% iirc.

Quote
The white homicide rate in America is about 5000 a year. in england it is between 750 and a thousand a year


No, we have a problem with Yardie gangs over here killing each other for control of the drug trade.

The government won't break the figures down by race in the UK, but Operation Trident, the London police department focusing on "black on black" drugs crime in London, were put in charge of  70 murder investigations last year, iirc.

Quote
beetle... you are victims... your crime rate has skyrocketed... not yours personaly... your little islands, since your draconian gun ban


Well, no it hasn't actually, but as it makes a nice headline I'm sure you'll keep repeating it.

The actual crime rate has gone down in Britain over the last ten years, the headline rate has gone up because of changes in the way crimes are counted.

Quote
you gave up your human rights for nothing... worse... you have made things much worse... Our crime rate continues to fall while yours skyrockets.


Our murder rate is down, yours has been going up for 3 years, iirc.

Quote
like england we would have to be told that resisting criminals is illegal... helping someonme being victimized would have to be illegal.


There's nothing at all illegal about resisiting criminals. You can use whatever level of force is appropriate, up to and including lethal force.


Quote
Guns are not the real problem. Despite too strict gun laws in this country there are apparently 230,000 guns in the hand of gun owners. With a population 3.5 million that is a lot of firearms per head. One for every thirteen people.


How many handguns?

And you say you have too strict gun laws, isn't that a sign they are working?

You cannot just go into a shop and buy a gun after a simple background check, can you?

And if you have a gun, it's traced to you, and you can't sell it to a crack dealer without the police wondering where it's gone.

Guns don't need to be banned to keep them from getting to criminals easily, they need to be controlled.

Lazs has quite a few handguns, from what I understand, and there is nothing to stop him selling them to neighbourhood criminals. Nothing at all.

It may be illegal, depending on state laws, but there's no mechanism in place to stop him doing it.

I'm not suggesting Lazs would, for all the arguments on here he I don't think he's irresponsible or a criminal. But if Lazs can do it, there's nothing to stop anyone else, either.


You can tell how hard it is for a criminal to get a gun in Britain by looking at the guns siezed by police. The last I saw, almost 70% of the handguns siezed by the police from criminals (and there weren't many), were air pistols or blank firers converted to fire 22 lr.

There was a popular British garage act (think equivalent of US rap group), So Solid Crew. They had quite a few hits, big name group. A couple of shootings at their gigs. One of their members was caught by police with a handgun. Again, a converted airpistol firing 22 lr.

For all the "mate of a mate of a mate", the best a multi millionaire garage group involved in the drugs and club scene of London could come up with was a converted airpistol.

Offline demaw1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
More Gun control???
« Reply #149 on: August 15, 2004, 07:11:16 PM »
Nashwan it is in your 5:59 pm post.

 Beetle not sure where I got 33000, will look again .As is normal I will retract it if wrong.

  Nashwan you said you wouldnt know where to get a gun in england..One of your fellow citizens here said it would be easy.

 I know beyound a shadow of a doubt I could get a weapon in England in 1 week even though I have never been there.As a matter of fact I would do it to show you if certian conditions were meant.

 Bottom line is
 
 1. few countries are as diversified as we are,

  2. your population is much smaller then ours and you never address that.

  3. our imagration is much more leaniant than yours.

 4. A mericans have never been subjects. while europe is use to it. Therefore the second admendment was not to protect hunting,but rather as a deterant from a hitler,stalin situration.

 It would be our duty to try to overthrow such things,where as europe has always just sat around and let them happen.

  Our motto is,  give me LIBERTY, or give me death,  your motto is, give me life no  matter  the cost.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2004, 07:14:24 PM by demaw1 »