Author Topic: From a neutral's perspective  (Read 1239 times)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
From a neutral's perspective
« on: October 02, 2004, 06:59:32 AM »
From what i saw of the debate between bush and kerry..

Bush got annihilated, he looked stupid, lacked knowledge, sincerity and above all it looked like he lacked confidence in a debate.

It is the first time i have heard Kerry speak, he seemed basically the opposite of above, he was very impressive.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9804
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2004, 07:07:23 AM »
Please be sure to vote in the November election.

:cool:

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2004, 07:13:40 AM »
As one who appreciates fine public speaking I have to agree. I normally cant stand to watch Bush speeches and this "debate" was even more painful.  

Yet while Kerry is obviously the superior speaker of the two I simply do not trust a word of what he says now nor do I belive that he said anything substantial regarding policy Thursday night.

Too bad, because I'm pretty sick of both of them.. Where are the real leaders?
« Last Edit: October 02, 2004, 07:21:15 AM by GRUNHERZ »

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2004, 07:27:18 AM »
Ever thought about running yourself Grunherz? You are the most active political debater on this board if im not mistaken :)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2004, 07:41:19 AM »
I could never be a politican. :)

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Re: From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2004, 08:07:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
From what i saw of the debate between bush and kerry..

Bush got annihilated, he looked stupid, lacked knowledge, sincerity and above all it looked like he lacked confidence in a debate.

It is the first time i have heard Kerry speak, he seemed basically the opposite of above, he was very impressive.


Did you have the sound off?  You didn't listen to Kerry's erroneous facts?  

If we're going to elect a President just on the basis of his appearance let's get Pam Anderson in there.   She's over 35.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2004, 08:12:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I could never be a politican. :)


Why not?

Offline pugg666

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1232
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2004, 08:23:55 AM »
Quote
If we're going to elect a President just on the basis of his appearance let's get Pam Anderson in there. She's over 35.


She's Canadian ;)

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2004, 08:28:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by pugg666
She's Canadian ;)


Dang it!

What about Demi Moore?

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: Re: From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2004, 08:54:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet

If we're going to elect a President just on the basis of his appearance let's get Pam Anderson in there.   She's over 35.


Just giving my un-biased opinion, some like to see what it is like from a neutrals perspective.  I am not trying to say who you should vote for.

If you americans like this sort of thing, you ever get to see Prime Ministers Questions over there? Every wednesday the opposition parties get to ask the prime minister questions on pretty much all current events. I love watching it.

http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page306.asp
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline RTStuka

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 869
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2004, 09:34:12 AM »
I would have to agree with most opinions that Kerry did a much better job at articulating and speaking during the speech. I really thought the republicans were gonna train bush well enough to handle this but they def. slipped up. Although we should all stop calling it a debate because it wasnt, hell they couldnt even talk to each other.


SKUZZY FOR PRESIDENT 2008 :aok

Offline Pei

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1903
Re: Re: Re: From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2004, 09:34:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
Just giving my un-biased opinion, some like to see what it is like from a neutrals perspective.  I am not trying to say who you should vote for.

If you americans like this sort of thing, you ever get to see Prime Ministers Questions over there? Every wednesday the opposition parties get to ask the prime minister questions on pretty much all current events. I love watching it.

http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page306.asp


It's one of the great aspects of UK democracy. Unfortunately Tony has succeeeded in reducing the number of appearances he has to make and the number of questions he has to answer.
Even Maggie didn't dare try that, though to be fair there weren't many who could face up to the old girl across the floor of the chamber.

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2004, 09:44:30 AM »
I would agree with furball. But, analysists say who "wins or loses" the questions is immaterial. It's the candidate who can appear more authentically human when talking in front of a TV that usually gets the most in terms of votes out of a presidential debate.

Offline pugg666

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1232
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2004, 10:00:21 AM »
Quote
Dang it!

What about Demi Moore?


Hell yes, I'd vote for her :D

Offline RTSigma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
From a neutral's perspective
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2004, 10:57:04 AM »
This is going to be the worst election ever.

I may be a Republican, but I don't want to vote for Bush.

Kerry is ok, but I've seen better.


How is Nader and Perot doing?

Sigma of VF-17 JOLLY ROGERS