gameplay idea for those who fight..

[Honch]

Dam You Beetle!!!  Now we're gunna have to run this thread another page!

NI!

[lazs2]

another page?   no problem.... brits have bad teeth and pee 51 guys are skilless.

lazs

[midnight Target]

What you all don't realize about lazs is that he flys at the same speed he drives his cars.... neither one gets over 120... much.  

Sure its a rut, but he deals with it.

[Honch]

Well Sax turned me into a Newt!

[sax]

Originally posted by Honch
Well Sax turned me into a Newt!

And Slappy turned yu into a kill stealing dweeb.

I was never so happy as when the CV got KO'd last nite and I seen yu looking everywhere to land your ill gotten gains:)

[Honch]

You should try to kill them faster!

Bah!  

Any kill in a F4F is a good one. . Even if it's stolen!

[lazs2]

curses.... pegged by MT.

lazs

[nazgulAX]

A CV based map would be a great idea imo. If formatted with 3 carriers and numerous support ships per CV group, it would be very cool. Make carriers supplyable, or at least self healing like land bases. As for the kill joy carrier kamakazies....thats what high alt cover is for. Fly dumb, or greedy, with no high cover...you will loose your Carrier.( or at least 1 or 2 of em). Make the ports airfields also like Ozkansas map so that they could be defended, and the buff flyers could have a place to take off from. Sea battles were one of the biggest factors for victory in the war        ( pacific at least) and I agree it's time to give them there due.

As allways, feel free to call me stupid, correct spelling, whine, or reply with any irrelivent remark that suits you.

          AX

[beet1e]

Nazgul - not a bad idea. My fondest memories of AH were the F4U flights from the carrier, intercepting buffs or pushing the battle back to the field from which they came.

Spelling Mistakes

You didn't do too badly, just one or two I should point out.

• supplyable - not a real word. "able to receive supplies" would be more correct, but longer of course.
• You used the word "loose" but you meant "lose". A common and infuriating mistake on the internet. Almost as bad as "I could care less" when it should be "I could not care less".
• irrelivent - I think you meant irrelevant.
• "give them there due" - "there" should have been "their".

We'll discuss the folly of using a preposition at the end of a sentence in the next lesson.

[nazgulAX]

LOL....had to throw a few in there:-)
I like to think of it as   Web-bonics

[lazs2]

furballers are not interested in resupplying anything or bombing anything or intercepting toolshed killers.

lazs

[beet1e]

Well, I'm bored. I think I'll get out my chess set. I'll leave the Kings in the box, and just move the other pieces around on the board for a couple of hours. Tum-te-tum...  

[mars01]

Well, I'm bored. I think I'll get out my chess set. I'll leave the Kings in the box, and just move the other pieces around on the board for a couple of hours. Tum-te-tum...

LOL Beet, this statement is just showing your ignorance about furballing, but we have been there, done that so no need to turn this into a 6 page post.

[beet1e]

Originally posted by mars01
LOL Beet, this statement is just showing your ignorance about furballing

Erm... it wasn't designed to demonstrate my knowledge (or lack of) furballing, but to illustrate my view of the futility of furballing.

:aok

[Furious]

Originally posted by beet1e
Erm... it wasn't designed to demonstrate my knowledge (or lack of) furballing, but to illustrate my view of the futility of furballing.

:aok

Are you saying that some folks having fun is futile?  Aren't we supposed to be having fun?