Originally posted by Toad
Yeah, murder.
When a fighter shoots down a civilian airliner that he could have forced to land.. that's murder.
He couldn't identify it?
He DID identify it as civilian.. shot it down anyway. Barbaric.
Your quote is from an obvious fake. IIRC Funked posted it several years ago. Please give me a link.
BTW, Michael Brun says that first interview on Soviet TV and first official report stated that it was maj. Kazmin who flew board 805, while Osipovich flew board 804 - a brand new MiG-31.
OTOH, RC-135 is also a "Boeing" and it's a "civilian plane", a 707.
Another question: do your pilots follow orders only when bombing refugees convoys, like in Kosovo? Do you really mean they will refuse to shoot down a "civilian" 707?... Sooo naive...
Here is a link for Russian readers:
http://www.airforce.ru/history/kal007/index.htmAnd this one is for non-Russian speaking and Toad:
http://www.airforce.ru/history/kal007/index.htm
Over more than ten years of investigation, Michel Brun has collected and analyzed evidence which indicates
* that KAL 007's off course flight was intentional
* that when the Korean airliner approached Sakhalin Island, so too did a number of U.S. military aircraft some of which had already overflown the Kamchatka Peninsula
* that when a number of them entered Soviet territorial airspace at Sakhalin, a more than two hour air battle was initiated in which some ten U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy aircraft were shot down with the loss of at least thirty U.S. servicemen
* that KAL007 itself appears not to have overflown either Kamchatka or Sakhalin but passed through the Straits just the south of that Soviet island, flew south over the Sea of Japan for at least 45 minutes
* and was then destroyed off Honshu by means and for reasons which remain to be established
a more than two hour air battle was initiated - I understand why that pilot I saw in Sept, 83 on TV was all trembling.
Brun's book must be taken with a grain of salt, especially when he describes how he found "debris" from Korean Boeing, but some of the analysis he made are wery interesting.
Anyway, knowing the usual CIA practice in such provocations - they could easily order US fighters to shoot that 747 over Sea of Japan, or simply blow it up remotely, to cover American losses and get a beautiful propaganda example.