Author Topic: Arrest mistake (Read 5418 times)

Engine · « **Reply #150 on:** March 09, 2005, 02:34:34 PM »

oh snap, maverick and del strike a blow for po-po

Wow. This ghetto play-by-play really spices up the workday.

Martlet · « **Reply #151 on:** March 09, 2005, 02:37:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Engine
oh snap, maverick and del strike a blow for po-po

Wow. This ghetto play-by-play really spices up the workday.

I don't think that was a serve you can return.

Engine · « **Reply #152 on:** March 09, 2005, 02:40:18 PM »

It's been done a while. Tweety lost.

indy007 · « **Reply #153 on:** March 09, 2005, 02:42:50 PM »

I go back to my earlier reply. If they put a small monitor, plugged into the car's computer, facing the rear seat "occupant" that automatically played a video of somebody reading off the Miranda rights when you put them in there...

y'alls whole arguement would be kinda null & void

EN4CER · « **Reply #154 on:** March 09, 2005, 02:51:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TweetyBird
Police officers expertise is not law and prededent, its law enforcement.

Ignorance is bliss. Funny - when I went to the Police Academy (Suffolk County Police Academy NY - 6 Months) the New York State Penal Law was almost a 5 week topic with a 2 major block tests. IMO the cops I work with now the law better than most prosecuting attorney’s in the DAs office out here – especially when you are studying for a promotional exam.

Regarding your story Tweety – The officers acted in good faith with reasonable cause to believe that your nephew had a warrant. Not following department SOP is another matter and should be delt with accordingly by the departent's administration.
As far a Kidnapping charge goes – please – make me laugh some more. When he was placed under arrest – that’s when the handcuff’s where placed on him – he’s in custody as far as I’m concerned. When they realized their error they unarested him – its happened to guys on my job and nothing becomes of it as long as the cops acted in GOOD FAITH.

Question – What prompted the Officers to run data on your nephew?

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #155 on:** March 09, 2005, 03:03:11 PM »

Tweedy lost?? lol pfftt!

wtf?? When is this a competition? lol

I thought it was the first to start tossing insults that was always the loser...

At any level, nice post Tweedy.. Glad your kin was released.. Also, its good too see a poster keep their cool in the face of such dogpiling mental masturbation.. Keep up the good work Hoffa!

Martlet · « **Reply #156 on:** March 09, 2005, 03:06:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
Tweedy lost?? lol pfftt!

wtf?? When is this a competition? lol

I thought it was the first to start tossing insults that was always the loser...

At any level, nice post Tweedy.. Glad your kin was released.. Also, its good too see a poster keep their cool in the face of such dogpiling mental masturbation.. Keep up the good work Hoffa!

If your institution issued passes, would you qualify for a weekend pass, or chaperoned day pass only?

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #157 on:** March 09, 2005, 03:12:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
If your institution issued passes, would you qualify for a weekend pass, or chaperoned day pass only?

Are you asking me for a date?? Cause certainly you qualify as a *****.. Your just not a cute enough ***** for me I dont think..

Martlet · « **Reply #158 on:** March 09, 2005, 03:14:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
Are you asking me for a date?? Cause certainly you qualify as a *****.. Your just not a cute enough ***** for me I dont think..

I was just wondering if you had company when your nose was that far up Tweety's rectum.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #159 on:** March 09, 2005, 03:20:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
I was just wondering if you had company when your nose was that far up Tweety's rectum.

You SURE you're not asking me for a date?? lol

Martlet · « **Reply #160 on:** March 09, 2005, 03:21:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
You SURE you're not asking me for a date?? lol

So, which is it? Do you get chaperoned or do you two get "private time"?

DoctorYO · « **Reply #161 on:** March 09, 2005, 04:08:01 PM »

Quote

The officers acted in good faith with reasonable cause to believe that your nephew had a warrant.

Not crossreferencing his name vs his DL # could easily be construed as gross negligence.

Did the suspect (nephew) have the same name as the perp with the arrest warrant; if they ran the DL # shouldn't a name come up (you could be in backwater usa so i dont know; its all computers down here in south florida)

this is pretty cut and dry..(unless backwater usa defense and there are a few of those in our country with little budget for tech...)

If they did have a computer in the cruiser or called dispatch the non crossreferencing the suspects name vs his DL number could be a bad blow for acting in good faith defense..

DoctorYo

TweetyBird · « **Reply #162 on:** March 09, 2005, 06:06:23 PM »

No he didn't have the same name same date of birth or anything close to the guy with the warrant. Then knew this when they got to the station and they couldn't pull up a warrant or any kind. Since the arresting had already informed us anoth jurisdiction would be picking him up at their lockup, imagine their suprise when they discovered no warrant to compel the other jurisdiction to do that. They knew this when they had his real name and denying anyone by that name was in lockup.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #163 on:** March 09, 2005, 06:11:42 PM »

Martlet you get gross at the drop of a hat.

En4cer - you creep me out. I picture handcuffs and mannequines.

Maverick, are you claiming to be Robert Barr raising the bar yet again?

Martlet · « **Reply #164 on:** March 09, 2005, 06:45:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TweetyBird
Martlet you get gross at the drop of a hat.

En4cer - you creep me out. I picture handcuffs and mannequines.

Maverick, are you claiming to be Robert Barr raising the bar yet again?

Then stop dropping your hat.