Originally posted by midnight Target
Well, if the objective of the 6-nation talks was to stop NK from becoming a nuclear power... then we have achieved failure. Well done. And if critisizing the opposition is now just a spin job we nmight as well end all politics as we know it.
I'm just sick of the automatic attacks. People do things that are stupid sometimes and should be called on it. The simple fact that their last name is Clinton should have no bearing on the facts. The same goes for Bush or Reagan or freakin lowlife Nixon. The title of this thread said Hillary was blaming Bush for the nukes in NK. She isn't, she did critisize the diplomacy.
She's a politician that is putting herself in front of the camera making assenine comments. I've got news for you MT: She's a media potato. She goes on the news and announces how she plans on keeping a VA hospital open on Veteran's day. She shows up as a speaker at a NY policemans ball right after 9/11. She does both of these things strictly for the camera without even an incling of consideration for what she has said about vets and the NYPD in the past. She is the absolute worst type of politician out there. There's plenty of people to defend from Nuke's attacks, but Hillary isn't one of them.
And... do you really think the talks were about how to stop NK from becoming a nuclear power? You do realize that's a bit tough when they already have everything the need... right? Stopping him is going to take intervention. You tell me how that is going to be done without China, Russia, Japan and SK being part of it. Once he was given the ability to make weapons grade plutonium, the rest was simply academic. This is not a really big cause/effect stretch of the immagination MT.
