Turning The Tables George Galloway

[Gixer]

Originally posted by Mickey1992
Ummmm........Wha?  

I know it's quite funny, his little rants remind me of another well known child.





...-Gixer

[Maverick]

Originally posted by Sandman
He's either an incredibly excellent liar or he really is telling the truth.

Excellent liar ------- career politician any questions?
Career politician telling the truth..... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Gixer]

But alot of his statements were blunt and correct when asked stupid questions. No liaing required.

Galloway conceded he had met with Saddam Hussein twice, "exactly the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld met him.

"The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns and to give him maps, the better to target ... those guns," Galloway said. "I met him to try and bring about an end to sanctions, suffering and war."

I think it was at about this time that Fox cut the coverage. LOL

The Senate panel looked way out of it's league. Only to be left mumbling a few words to the media at the end. They don't realise that British politicans have to do that kind of debating every day. Even Clinton would of been eaten alive in British Parliment. Let alone Bush. LOL


...-Gixer

[Torque]

galloway showed them what they're, morally bankrupt hypocites.

no surprise al-foxeera pulled the plug.

[NUKE]

Originally posted by Torque
galloway showed them what they're, morally bankrupt hypocites.

 

really? Who's "they" ?

I think Galloway is a hypocrite.

[NUKE]

Galloway was a vocal opponent to UN sanctions on Iraq, yet he never uttered a word about Saddam's murdering and lawlessness.

Galloway never objected to Iraq's "illegal" war on Kuwait. Galloway is a real treat.

[Gixer]

Originally posted by NUKE
really? Who's "they" ?

I think Galloway is a hypocrite.

Care to expand on that one as to why you think he's a hypocrite? As the Senate certinly couldn't come up with anything during the debate interesting to know your reasoning and facts.

You really should read the transcript before just slagging him off as a hypocrite as a parting shot.


...-Gixer

[NUKE]

Originally posted by Gixer
Care to expand on that one as to why you think he's a hypocrite? As the Senate certinly couldn't come up with anything during the debate interesting to know your reasoning and facts.

You really should read the transcript before just slagging him off as a hypocrite as a parting shot.


...-Gixer

He's a hypocrite because he labeled the UN sanctions as murderous, yet supported Saddam and his his murderous dictatorship.

[Gixer]

Originally posted by NUKE
He's a hypocrite because he labeled the UN sanctions as murderous, yet supported Saddam and his his murderous dictatorship.

How did he support Sadam? You seem to always forget that the US was a strong supporter of Sadam for many years during his reign. So isn't that being hypocritical?


...-Gixer

[NUKE]

Originally posted by Gixer
How did he support Sadam? You seem to always forget that the US was a strong supporter of Sadam for many years during his reign. So isn't that being hypocritical?


...-Gixer

The US supported Saddam at one time, we have not supported Saddam for a long time. How is that being  hypocritical?

A hypocrite is someone like Galloway, who condemns UN sactions as murderous while siding with Saddam.

Gixer, I thought you liked the UN?

[Gixer]

Originally posted by NUKE
The US supported Saddam at one time, we have not supported Saddam for a long time. How is that being  hypocritical?

A hypocrite is someone like Galloway, who condemns UN sactions as murderous while siding with Saddam.

Gixer, I thought you liked the UN?

So the US supported Sadam at one time when he was or wasn't a muderous dictator? As I thought he was a murderous dictator during all of his reign? Or do you only like to think of the US as supporting Sadam when he was a good dictator  fighting those nasty Iranians.

So in that case it's hypocritical to call Galloway a supporter of a muderous dictator and the US not since we are talking about  the same dictator aren't we?

Alot of people do see the UN sanctions as muderous to the Iraqi people. And that those UN sanctions were mainly proposed,implimented,supported and enforced by the US.

But the argument you started wasn't about the rights and wrongs of those sanctions but of calling Galloway a hypocrite. Which he may or might not be but it's hilarious to try and claim the morale high ground for the US government at the same time. Really is the pot calling the kettle black don't you think?


...-Gixer

[midnight Target]

Oh yea!!kL?? ;Well yoou stoopiod consertbvatives will jusst never larn the truf I tell ya what!

All yoouo got is CVlinton Oh yae but Cluintoon well thats all you gat!!!





The preceding message has been brought to you by GeenCloud's evil liberal twin.

[Gixer]

Originally posted by midnight Target
Oh yea!!kL?? ;Well yoou stoopiod consertbvatives will jusst never larn the truf I tell ya what!

All yoouo got is CVlinton Oh yae but Cluintoon well thats all you gat!!!

The preceding message has been brought to you by GeenCloud's evil liberal twin.

...-Gixer

[ASTAC]

First off....Fox news is no more or less evil than any of the other networks...you watch the one that says what you like to hear..and of course the one you watch won't be biased in your mind.

2nd who the F cares about this Oil for food? Hasn't affected my life in anyway..or any other Americans as far as I know, or the rest of the world except maybe the Iraqi people themselves. But since they show their appreciation for what we did for them on a daily basis, who the F cares about them?

[thrila]

In the video Galloway did say he did not support saddams regime.  In fact he protested against Saddam outside the Iraq embassy around the time certain govt's were supplying him with weapons.

The opening 15-20 mins of Galloways speech was very good.