Author Topic: 2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped  (Read 5704 times)

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #195 on: October 20, 2005, 06:12:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Blostrupmoen
Every minute the Elektron is not fishing she's losing money and now she's not been able to fish for days, and being escorted to port.  


LMAO
She had to head back to port to off load anyway. Geeez!

Quote
The fish in her hold will surly spoil before this is resolved, and she's even a legal liability for her owners. This is a disaster for the Elektron, her crew and her owners. So ... what's your point Jackal? [/B]
[/QUOTE]

If any fish was in the hold and I presume there were ,what makes you think they would spoil? Read above.

Disaster my posterior. :)
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline icemaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #196 on: October 20, 2005, 06:16:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
Nice looking trawler.. with any luck a breeze will sink it soon :rofl



  Good lord if I was on that fargin piece of floating rust I would beg to have any coast guard arrest me and take me of of it. They are some ballsy MOFOs to go to sea in that piece of crap.
Army of Das Muppets     
Member DFC Furballers INC. If you cant piss with big dogs go run with the pack

Offline Estel

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 347
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #197 on: October 20, 2005, 06:29:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wilbus
Nope Estel I don't remmeber such a thread, I never saw it infact but I will take your word for it. I wouldn't be all that surprised if it's true either.

 
After a dose of "communist propaganda" and other things the topic was deleted after my posts an ICAO materials about shooting down an "Aeroflot" plane by USA interceptor. There was a lot of facts. But. As usually it wasn't neccesary for somebody.

Quote

This is a totally different kind of answer. I read what you typed, not what I wanted to see. There is nothing in the above answer saying "maybe it is true maybe not" and nothing that implies it. The answer is a simple statement saying "this whole thing was a fraud".

If you did infact mean it in any other way I sugest you rephrase the answer quite a bit.


In russian, when you say "maybe" it's mean: "Maybe yes and maybe no". If in english it's not the same.... Than it's my fault.

Offline Estel

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 347
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #198 on: October 20, 2005, 06:32:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by icemaw
Good lord if I was on that fargin piece of floating rust I would beg to have any coast guard arrest me and take me of of it. They are some ballsy MOFOs to go to sea in that piece of crap.


Don't cry, this can is not the baddiest one.

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #199 on: October 20, 2005, 06:46:53 PM »
Phhhffffffffft!
Yea right! :)
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Lets sum up..
« Reply #200 on: October 20, 2005, 07:21:33 PM »
No Propaganda, Estel?  Lets just take your posts outta this thread as an example.

Quote
3. The regulations about borders of the given zone are accepted only by Norway. Other countries, including Russia, did not sign agreements on the given territory wich is by default the international waters.

4. As we know, intercepting the ship in the international waters is piracy.

5. If our authorities will arrest those inspectors they will go to court on charge in a piracy.


Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
Forgot to say. USA don't accept guarding zone too.


Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
Looks like you don't see difference between "economical zone" and "fishguarding zone". If you don't know, these things are different. The trawler was in "fishguarding zone".


And tell me Estel.. is it not Norway that does the fishguarding, to protect the area from illegal fishing procedures?

Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
There is nothing about our trawler made something unlawful.


Propaganda. (i'm being kind. looks like a bald faced lie to me)

Next:

Quote
(From Boroda) The radiogram from Elektron to Arctic Sea Administration said that Norwegians are dropping fire-bombs on the trowler, point guns at it, and that in case they will open fire - captain will try to ram them, and the crew will be rescued by another trowler that follows Elektron. They also say they make photos of attacks.


I guess Boroda’s a bit better at propaganda than you are. Really Estel, you must do better to come up to this level of entertainment. ;)

Next:

Quote
Be glad, you are not norway sailor from norway trawler wich don't get 120mm holes in hull, when they are fishing in our economy zone. Usually they are dropping fish and running away to Norway territory. But you gave us a good learning. Now we will shoot them.


Propaganda. Boastful, but still..

Next:

Quote
When trawler began manuevering to establish course into Russian territory, inspectors was offered to leave the ship. But they denied it. They said that they have an order to stay on the ship. After that captain informed them again, that the trawler is headed to Murmansk. But inspectors denied again.


Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
Another part of this agreement was about cooperated duty of our border guard ships in the region. For example, norway ships can be under the protection of russian border ships and vice versa. But here began strange situations, when our ship is on duty, Norway coast guard is not present in the region and all trawlers, russian and norway are feeling ok. Just our ship is living area, Norway coast guard beginning unlawful arrests and punishments.


I doubt seriously the Norwegians consider themselves ‘protected’ by anything flying a Russian flag. And vice versa.

Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
No. They did it. They arrested the ship. Withdrawn all journals and personal documents. Also withdrawn flag certificate. And tryed to tow the trawler Norvegian port. But the cable was torn.


She was never under tow, no documents were removed from the vessel.

Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
Norwegian plane tryed to stop "Elektron" by droping the net while overflying. But missed and catched another trawler "Arlashkin". "Arlashkin" lost the speed. The rescue ship "Purga" is headed to "Arlashkin" now. As was said by Border authorities, "Elektron" can achieve border at 0100am Oct 19.


Now, this is ALMOST as good as Boroda’s Propaganda. Better, but still..
 
Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
The captain of trawler Arlashkin is declaring that ship and crew is in danger. As it known, norwegian plane dropped "delt" the net onto the Elektron but missed and catched Arlashkin. Trawler lost the speed. The main engine is stopped. The weather is nord-west 9, wave 4-6 meters. Wind 25-28 m/sec. The Mount Kent trawler wich is near Arlashkin can not evacuate the crew due to weather. Yea guys. You are the best. Catched wrong ship and leaved her without help in the storm.


No better, really.

Just more of the same… PROPAGANDA.

Next:

Quote
(from Boroda) Russian Federation is a direct successor of the Soviet Union, and follows all the treaties and obligations accepted by the USSR.

JFYI, Russian Federation payed the debts made by Russian Empire, not only USSR, and we are a permanent member of UN SC, etc.


You see, Boroda is the Master.. one line of truth, always followed by the propaganda lie.

Next:

Quote
Maybe because all this bad smealing story wasn't true? And there wasn't any hostages. And maybe there were only inspectors impudent from impunity.


Poor try.

Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
In 1947 USSR denied an offer to divide Border Guarding duty and Administration duty between Norway and USSR. So Norway did it all alone. Was it really hard work to establish these duties alone? Sure, you must understand, that USSR was ruined after the war. And didn't have money, personnel or anybody else to divide this work with Norway. How do you think, could this denying be a way to the problem of 1951 and when later, Norway issued problems for our fishers?


Circular logic mixed with Propaganda.

Next:

Quote
But I remember. Always when you are headed to the truth (I don't mean you personally this time) wich is not good for you, there is beginning flame about propaganda and etc. Can I remind you a topic about KAL007, where was proved that USA shooted down the civilian planes with passengers more times even any country in the world. Do you remember what happened than? Why always when you see facts that don't correlate with your opinion of how-should-facts-be-because-I-seen-it-on-TV the discussion is dropping to usual flame with "propaganda" and "communists"?


This ones my favorite. A propaganda re-direct of propaganda to redirect responsibility for….

..Propaganda. ;)

Thanks for playing Estel!

The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Russian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2992
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #201 on: October 20, 2005, 08:49:44 PM »
Íó è êàêèì õóåì íàäî õóÿ÷åòü ïî ýòîé õóéíå? Õóé ñ íåóâàæàåìûìè õóÿðèêàìè è âñå.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #202 on: October 20, 2005, 08:54:02 PM »
yup.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #203 on: October 21, 2005, 01:57:50 AM »
Hangtime Boroda was at least partly right about that debt payment thing - russia has paid finland some of the decades old debts soviet union trade left us with. They say they seriously aim to make the payments (finally).

Which would be only right considering we paid our post war penalties. In full.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #204 on: October 21, 2005, 03:01:12 AM »
The coastguard and i belive also the 2 inspectors are now holding a press conferance. When one of the papers prints it out I will post the main things when all the facts are out.

Btw.. Estel... NO nets were dropped. The trawler that reported it prolly got tangled up in its own gear or it was false info put out by the company that owned it.

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #205 on: October 21, 2005, 03:52:27 AM »
Quote
Maybe because all this bad smealing story wasn't true? And there wasn't any hostages. And maybe there were only inspectors impudent from impunity.


"Maybe" doesn't mean "Maybe yes Maybe no", "maybe" means "maybe". In this case your "maybe" pretty much says "this whole story was a lie". You make a statement, a clear statement that the whole thing was a lie. You should have formulated (whatever you wanted to say) in a very different way if you wanted to sound like "maybe yes maybe no".

So a Russian Aeroflot plane was shot down by US interceptors? (If I understood it right?). So what? There was a Swedish DC3 and shortly after a Catalina SAR plane shot down by Russian interceptors over international waters in 1952.

But you know what? That's got nothing to do with this thread, neither does the "other" post or discussion you pointed at.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9915
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #206 on: October 21, 2005, 04:29:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wilbus
[BThere was a Swedish DC3 and shortly after a Catalina SAR plane shot down by Russian interceptors over international waters in 1952.
[/B]


Those aircraft were spying illegally on the glorious soviet union! The russian trawler was sent to rescue the crews, unfortunately the paperwork was late in getting through due to a poor designed teletype machine the soviet union sto...err... borrowed from the inferior amerikans!

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #207 on: October 21, 2005, 05:20:08 AM »
Russians are acually some of the finest and most hospitable people I have ever met. Too bad so many of them still see the world from a 1970's perspective. Must be propaganda from the past that still lingers in the back of their minds or some kind of pride.

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #208 on: October 21, 2005, 06:32:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
Btw.. Estel... NO nets were dropped. The trawler that reported it prolly got tangled up in its own gear or it was false info put out by the company that owned it.


At least finnish media is reporting of a net dropped by chopper.
Although the captain of Arlashkin should've knew better than tailing a ship which is being pursuited by warships.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
2 Norwegian coastguard inspectors kinapped
« Reply #209 on: October 21, 2005, 07:32:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fishu
At least finnish media is reporting of a net dropped by chopper.
Although the captain of Arlashkin should've knew better than tailing a ship which is being pursuited by warships.


They are prolly quoting either the Russian trawler or the company that owns it. I'm sure the Helo crew knew if they had thrown a net or not.

The CG decided to not board, ram or stop the trawler in any way because of the risk in the heavy seas.... why would they then try to stop it with a net in the very same heavy seas? It would seriously endanger the trawler, its crews and the CG personel if it could not manuver in those conditions.