Author Topic: Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release  (Read 10721 times)

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #270 on: February 23, 2006, 01:21:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Timofei
Do you guys have life ?
I mean really ? Girlfriend, wife, work, other hobbies ?
Is this important ?
Kingpin of your life...wobbliness of 109 in  AH :D


Ehy, ehy, ehy dont be offensive this euro working time :mad: :huh ;)
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline Mustaine

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4139
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #271 on: February 23, 2006, 01:53:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sable
BRIEF COMPARISON WITH Me.109G
Turning Circle
49. The Mustang III is greatly superior.

COMBAT PERFORMANCE WITH LONG-RANGE TANKS
Turning Circle
56. The tanks do not make quite so much difference as one might expect. The Mustang III can at least turn as tightly as the FW.190 (BMW.801D) without stalling out and therefore definitely more tightly than the Me.109G.
actually a quote in the quote.

i have to mention, i find these analysis odd, and somewhat frequent in the little reading i have done.

based on that the 109 turns definately WORSE than 190's. that is something i have read more than once.

the 190A5 MAYBE can keep a turn with a g10 (old AH G10) but not a chance with others, especially a G2.

what 109 and 190 are they talking about in this above quoted test? are they generalizing about 190's and 109's?

do you see the dilema / discrepency?
Genetically engineered in a lab, and raised by wolverines -- ]V[ E G A D E T ]-[
AoM DFC ZLA BMF and a bunch of other acronyms.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #272 on: February 23, 2006, 02:23:31 PM »
I see many discrepencies

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #273 on: February 23, 2006, 03:00:16 PM »
"Has it ever dawned on any of you that there were aircraft that were better at handling than the 109/190's?"

Really? Name a few?

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline JAWS2003

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #274 on: February 23, 2006, 03:08:05 PM »
From soviet fighter tactics in 1942

"Germans will position their fighters at different altitudes, especially when expecting to encounter our fighters. FW-190 will fly at 1,500-2,500 meters and Me-109G at 3,500-4,000 meters. They interact in the following manner:

 

FW-190 will attempt to close with our fighters hoping to get behind them and attack suddenly. If that maneuver is unsuccessful they will even attack head-on relying on their superb firepower. This will also break up our battle formations to allow Me-109Gs to attack our fighters as well. Me-109G will usually perform boom-n-zoom attacks using superior airspeed after their dive.

 

FW-190 will commit to the fight even if our battle formation is not broken, preferring left turning fights. There has been cases of such turning fights lasting quite a long time, with multiple planes from both sides involved in each engagement. "

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #275 on: February 23, 2006, 05:37:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Charge
http://www.savanne.org/kuvat/HypCoug1_resize.jpg

It is quite accurate with Hall-sensors. Doesn't really help on 190 slow speed wobble once it sets on.


Interesting stick!

I use all CH Products gear, with excellent precision. I found that increasing roll damping some significantly reduced the 109's twitch as it approached the limits. This isn't a cure, but it does help quite a bit.

It's not the "floppy" behavior that bothers me, it's the near complete lack of rudder authority at low speeds that I find perplexing, inasmuch as the 109s supposedly had very effective rudders and the 109s of AH1 don't have this problem.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #276 on: February 23, 2006, 07:24:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Apar
Dead on. I flew the g10 almost exclusively and the few times I took up a P51 or Spit I was surprised on how easy they handle compared to the g10 (and K4).

Widewing up a 109g2 with 75% (or more) fuel and do some agressive (tied) turnes at 200-220 mph in the DA or MA with it, you will see what happens. It will try to snaproll and you will having your hands full trying to to prevent it while trying to maintain turn rate. I'm happy to guide you through the process. Flying the 109 close to its envelope at high fuel state is a ***** (and that is not the case with the P51 and spit)


I flew the 109s last night with 50% fuel and usually take 75% in the MA. The 109G-2 doesn't give me trouble because I don't try to fly it like a Spitfire. But, that doesn't mean I don't fly it near the edge... I just avoid going beyond that point. Push any aircraft to its limits and it will depart. It doesn't help you to push it so hard that it snap spins (often in the opposite direction), and it usually costs you. There's little need to out-turn P-51s and P-47s when you can beat them working angles and forcing the fight into the vertical.

But hey, I'll be doing my Trainer stint in the TA tonight after 9 PM Eastern. So feel free to stop in and show me why I'm not flopping all over the place.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Apar

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 963
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #277 on: February 23, 2006, 07:32:35 PM »
Quote
I flew the 109s last night with 50% fuel and usually take 75% in the MA. The 109G-2 doesn't give me trouble because I don't try to fly it like a Spitfire. But, that doesn't mean I don't fly it near the edge... I just avoid going beyond that point. Push any aircraft to its limits and it will depart. It doesn't help you to push it so hard that it snap spins (often in the opposite direction), and it usually costs you. There's little need to out-turn P-51s and P-47s when you can beat them working angles and forcing the fight into the vertical.

But hey, I'll be doing my Trainer stint in the TA tonight after 9 PM Eastern. So feel free to stop in and show me why I'm not flopping all over the place.
 


Flying timid in any plane is not what this post is about Widewing. If you don't turn at all but just run the 109 and 190 won't snap roll on you either :O

Now go practice the 109 allot in the TA and if you feel your really ready to show me how to fly the 109 gimmy me a howl
« Last Edit: February 23, 2006, 07:38:40 PM by Apar »

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #278 on: February 23, 2006, 08:03:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Apar
Flying timid in any plane is not what this post is about Widewing. If you don't turn at all but just run the 109 and 190 won't snap roll on you either :O

Now go practice the 109 allot in the TA and if you feel your really ready to show me how to fly the 109 gimmy me a howl


Timid?! LOLOL

Drop by junior.... I'll show ya timid....

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #279 on: February 23, 2006, 08:19:39 PM »
For some reason - I thought one of the MAJOR rules of dogfighting had to do something "about retaining speed..and never get too slow in your aircraft"... :D

Offline Apar

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 963
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #280 on: February 23, 2006, 08:33:35 PM »
Quote
Timid?! LOLOL

Drop by junior.... I'll show ya timid....

My regards,

Widewing


Go practise for a year or so first LOL

There's only 2-3 plp I respect in a 109, you're definetly not one of them Widewing

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #281 on: February 23, 2006, 09:24:36 PM »
oooh  ooooohhh 109 fight!!!! lmao!!!!!

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #282 on: February 24, 2006, 12:56:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Apar
Go practise for a year or so first LOL

There's only 2-3 plp I respect in a 109, you're definetly not one of them Widewing


Uh huh....

Well, you said give ya a howl...I did and you didn't drop by...

Too bad, because in between working with new players, several of us flew duels in the 109s. Ghosth and I had quite a lot of fun and managed not to flop all over the place.

You'll have another opportunity, I'll be in the TA again tomorrow evening as I have a training appointment at 9 PM.. Should be done by 10:00 PM or so. If you can't make it, no problem. I'm in the TA Wednesday, Thursday and Friday evenings...Every week. If I'm busy, look for Airvent, he's pretty good in 109s, I'm sure he can keep you occupied until I'm free.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #283 on: February 24, 2006, 01:52:22 AM »
Quote
There's little need to out-turn P-51s and P-47s when you can beat them working angles and forcing the fight into the vertical.


That really isn't the point Widewing. The point is most other planes, Pony, Jug and the Hog (Hog most of all pherhaps) feels like flying on rails compared to 109, 190, 205. Crab a C-hog and you won't need to trim at all more or less, like flying with constant combat trim.

The 109 was a small plane, like the spit. It was built as an air superiority fighter and interceptor, not an escort fighter. The Spit and 109 were built on more or less the exact same terms, the spit ended up with a bit bigger wings and thus better turn radius. THey were both small airframes with the biggest possible engine installed.

The problem IS the turn radius. This problem might not lie in the 109 as much as it lies in the P51, P47, Hog etc etc (just tell me why I often outturn Spits in Ponys, granted the pilots aren't the top of the notch, but still, a n00b spit should outturn a P51). The P47 weights in at nearly 10,000 lbs EMPTY. That's 2500 lbs MORE then a FULLY LOADED 109. Not sure of the typical combatload of the Jug but remove maybe 4000 lbs from the max load of 17,500 lbs and we're down to 13,500lbs.

Now remove 1100lbs (500kg bomb) from the 109's max load of about 7500 and we're down to 6400 lbs. The P47 outturning the 109, outlooping it etc is like a 109 outturning a zeke.

So while I know the Jug and Pony can be beaten in the vertical using climbrate, we shouldn't have to.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Sable

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 265
Will 109s and Fw-190s be fixed before ToD release
« Reply #284 on: February 24, 2006, 03:06:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wilbus

The 109 was a small plane, like the spit. It was built as an air superiority fighter and interceptor, not an escort fighter. The Spit and 109 were built on more or less the exact same terms, the spit ended up with a bit bigger wings and thus better turn radius. THey were both small airframes with the biggest possible engine installed.
[/b]

242 sq ft vs. 174 sq ft.  Thats 39% more - almost half again as much.  

Quote
Originally posted by Wilbus

The problem IS the turn radius. This problem might not lie in the 109 as much as it lies in the P51, P47, Hog etc etc (just tell me why I often outturn Spits in Ponys, granted the pilots aren't the top of the notch, but still, a n00b spit should outturn a P51). The P47 weights in at nearly 10,000 lbs EMPTY. That's 2500 lbs MORE then a FULLY LOADED 109. Not sure of the typical combatload of the Jug but remove maybe 4000 lbs from the max load of 17,500 lbs and we're down to 13,500lbs.

Now remove 1100lbs (500kg bomb) from the 109's max load of about 7500 and we're down to 6400 lbs. The P47 outturning the 109, outlooping it etc is like a 109 outturning a zeke.

So while I know the Jug and Pony can be beaten in the vertical using climbrate, we shouldn't have to.


You could have an airplane that weighed as much as a mountain, but as long as you have enough lift and enough thrust, it'd turn with the best of them.

Below I've listed the combat takeoff weight, wing area, rate of climb (gives a good indication of acceleration/excess power available for manuevering) and wing loading for the Spit,109,51, and 47.

Spitfire Lf.IX - 7,485 lbs - 242 sq ft wing area
0 ft RoC - 4600 fpm
wing loading 30.9 lbs/sq ft

Bf109G-14 - 7,320 lbs - 174 sq ft wing area
0 ft RoC - 3,800-4,300 fpm (depends on the chart you look at)
wing loading 42 lbs/sq ft

P-51D - 10208 lbs - 236 sq ft wing area
0 ft RoC - 3,400-3,600 fpm (depending on chart again)
wing loading 43.3 lbs/sq ft

P-47D - 13,582-14,411 (depending on specific D model) - 300 sq ft wing area
0 ft RoC - 2,900-3,250fpm (depending on specific D model)
wing loading 45.3-48

Is it really that surprising that the Spit turns WAY better then the others, and that the last three are pretty close to one another?  Especially when you consider that the American planes are often running around the arena 1000+ lbs lighter then what I've listed here due to fuel and weapons loads.