KTM520guy, and Kurt.
I used to feel the same way you do now "If its in my gunsights Im gonna fire"
Problem is you dont get any better by always going for the HO. You just dont learn anything from it.
And often if you concentrate on the HO against a good pilot who manages to avoid it it more often then not will spell your doom.
Want to become a better dogfighter? Concentrate on NOT going for the HO but instead in that time you normally would be trying to aim. Think about your next move instead. More often then not at that very moment when you would normally be firing in the HO, You should be starting your manuver for position. Typically whoever gets the best position in a fight first, wins. Or forces the other guy to run for cover.
Ever go for the HO, miss and then wonder how that guy managed to turn on you so fast and shoot you dowhn afterwards?
Thats becaus while you were concentrating on shooting that HO shot, He was thinking two moves ahead of you. You missed because he already started his next move while you were busy boring straight ahead and shooting. Now you;ve blown past him and while your just starting your first move. He is already on his second, which is often placing him on your 6. Now you have to go from offence, to defence.
While many say HO is a perfectly legitimate tactic. in a 1 V 1 fight or where the odds are heavily in your favor numberswise. Its just a plain lame way to play.
Now if your the one grossly outnumbered then IMO its understandable why one would HO. Typically though, no matter what I only go for the HO when someone tries HOing me first. The only exeptions to that are when shooting at a 262 or against bomber formations or when being vulched taking off.
As the norm though I've learned its better not to HO and I have little respect for those that do.
Finally if you look at what can happen and often does happen during an HO you might see its not the vey best of moves.
1 You HO and win. Ok 1 point for the HO
2 You HO and loose 1 point against the HO
3 You HO and collide Which judging from the amount of complaints about collisions happens quite a bit 1 point against the HO
4 You HO against a decent pilot, miss and end up with him on your 6 1 point against the HO
5 You HO and win. But did you learn anything? did you get any better against those who can avoid and kill you? No. So even in this situation you won, but you also lost the chance to learn something. 0 points
So while the HO in some peoples opinion my very well be a valid tactic. Its just not the best of moves. Too many bad things can happen.
Just from my own experiance I found that by not going for the HO I got far better, faster then when I was going for it all the time.
It taught me to think ahead. Not just what I was going to do next. but 2-3 moves ahead of time. Instead of boring in on a target and blowing past him I found myself moving for position and winning more fights.
Now Im not going to claim Im one of the best sticks here. But I know Im not the worst and feel I can now at least hold my own with just about anyone.
I couldnt say that with any kind of confidence when I was an HO artist.
Finally. you will see alot of the better pilots holding in contempt those who HO because most of them look forward to the fight, the manuver for position. Thats what they enjoy and how they keep their skills sharp.
You REALLY want to get better at this sim. Do your best NOT to go for the HO unless absolutely necessary when heavily outnumbered.
Yea, you will die alot at first. But eventually you will get better. And eventually you will see you dont need the HO. And eventually you wont even want to.