Ann Coulter's shortest interview ever

[Sandman]

Originally posted by lazs2
Did you know that the founder of the ACLU was an avowed communist?  that he was violently against capitalism and the tenents of the constitution?

So what?

[BGBMAW]

so what?..lolol

ya..Sandy..So can you point out these bueatiful ..Great guys who run a great communist country?!!

You should move there Im thinking

[lukster]

Originally posted by BGBMAW
so what?..lolol

ya..Sandy..So can you point out these bueatiful ..Great guys who run a great communist country?!!

You should move there Im thinking

He won't need to move anywhere. We're becoming as communist as the next.

[Sandman]

In 1940, the ACLU formally barred communists from leadership or staff positions, and would take the position that it did not want communists as members either.

[68Hawk]

These are the founding members of the PNAC as found on the mission statement at the PNAC website:

Elliott Abrams     Gary Bauer     William J. Bennett     Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney    Eliot A. Cohen    Midge Decter    Paula Dobriansky    

Steve Forbes    Aaron Friedberg    Francis Fukuyama    Frank Gaffney    

Fred C. Ikle    Donald Kagan    Zalmay Khalilzad    I. Lewis Libby

Norman Podhoretz    Dan Quayle    Peter W. Rodman    Stephen P.

Rosen    Henry S. Rowen    Donald Rumsfeld    Vin Weber    

George Weigel    Paul Wolfowitz

These are the members of the PNAC who participated in the 'rebuilding americas defenses' project:  

Roger Barnett
U.S. Naval War College

Alvin Bernstein
National Defense University

Stephen Cambone
National Defense University

Eliot Cohen
Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University

Devon Gaffney Cross
Donors' Forum for International Affairs

Thomas Donnelly
Project for the New American Century

David Epstein
Office of Secretary of Defense,
Net Assessment

David Fautua
Lt. Col., U.S. Army

Dan Goure
Center for Strategic and International Studies

Donald Kagan
Yale University

Fred Kagan
U. S. Military Academy at West Point

Robert Kagan
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (if this one isnt a contradiction, I don't know what is)

Robert Killebrew
Col., USA (Ret.)

William Kristol
The Weekly Standard

Mark Lagon
Senate Foreign Relations Committee

James Lasswell
GAMA Corporation

I. Lewis Libby
Dechert Price & Rhoads

Robert Martinage
Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment

Phil Meilinger
U.S. Naval War College

Mackubin Owens
U.S. Naval War College

Steve Rosen
Harvard University

Gary Schmitt
Project for the New American Century

Abram Shulsky
The RAND Corporation

Michael Vickers
Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment

Barry Watts
Northrop Grumman Corporation

Paul Wolfowitz
Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University

Dov Zakheim
System Planning Corporation

I put some of the key names and organizations in bold for you.  Still think this is just a few odd people who have no influence?

These people are highly placed in government, big business and especially the military/industrial complex.  Some of them are also members of the Carlyle Group.  Fail to take them seriously at your own peril.

[T0J0]

Neocon is used as a polite way to point out a jewish conservative without sounding insulting...
Now using the names PNAC and Neocon in the same conspiracy type conclusion to a current world issue makes it sound "SINISTER"
Usually thrown out there by people who believe in conspiracy theories or thrive on them for attention, or make them up to win an argument

TJ

[68Hawk]

Neo-Conservatism and Neo-Liberalism have nothing to do with religion at all.  Some of the members of these movements claim to be highly religious, but the movements themselves couldn't give a damn, except to use religion as a tool to their advantage.  

The project for a new american century is technically a 'think tank' that validly represents the core of the neo-conservative movement.  Look it up for yourself if you think you know something about these movements.  Or don't, its up to you, but if you want to name yourself after a Japanese war criminal you might want to take a more critical view of your own government.

Many of the lies people are telling themselves today to keep themselves feeling good about what's happening in the world are the same as people told themselves in Germany and Japan to help them not see what was happening around them.

[BGBMAW]

ya,,Sandman

Ya ACLU ..throwing out its commies is like...Saddam giving his country food and medicine for OIL FOR FOOD..

We saw how that worked..lololol

Islam Is Peace...and ACLU is here to protect you


btw...Rainbows have pots of gold at the end

[Sandman]

Except for the complete and total lack of substantive information, you make a compelling argument. Bravo.

[lukster]

Originally posted by Sandman
In 1940, the ACLU formally barred communists from leadership or staff positions, and would take the position that it did not want communists as members either.

I thought they were the great protector of civil liberties? Why the banning of communists from their ranks? Where's the civil liberty in that?

[Sandman]

AFAIK, a private organization is free to ban whomever they choose.

[lukster]

Originally posted by Sandman
AFAIK, a private organization is free to ban whomever they choose.

Of course they are. They are protected by the constitution, just like the rest of us. They would have you believe that they, rather than the constitution, are the protectors of your civil liberties. I just find it hypocritical that they exclude a group protected by the constitution, especially considering that group founded them.

[BGBMAW]

ya sandie..."in 1940 they completly banned the commies"

                  " in 1992 Saddam completly banned Oil for Arms"


same as your statement..not my fault..just following your lead


lolol..too funny I use same crap as yours..and Im wrong one


I dont care..Liberalism is a mental disorder..heres soem stuff to help you drink the Kool-aid


Liberalism watches as a baby is partially delivered, stabbed in the head, its brains are sucked out, and then says that a constutional right has just been exercised.

Liberalism wants the name of God completely out of sight and speech so as to not offend the 10% who don't believe in Him (despite offending the 90% who do).

Liberalism sees a hard-working and successful business and says, "You have too much money, not fair!" It then seeks a way to take that business's money away from them so as to give it to those who have less (but only in the form of a social program, i.e. another government agency with government employees - none of which are any of these said people who have less, by the way)

Liberalism wants to change the definition of marriage, so that 3-4% of the population in this country can legally marry (even though only 25% of that segment actually wants it, and more than half of the entire country doesn't want this)

Liberalsm is intolerant of those beliefs it deems intolerant.  (read that one again)

[Sandman]

This just in... the majority isn't always right.

[BGBMAW]

well duh...didnt the popular vote go one way ..and the electoral go the other?..lololol