Author Topic: Ann Coulter's shortest interview ever (Read 7471 times)

EN4CER · « **Reply #270 on:** July 18, 2006, 09:42:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Carville ran Clinton’s 1992 campaign. Carville did not take a position in Clinton’s administration, but continued to act as an informal political advisor.

Correct, however he could have filled the position of "Court Jester" had Buba appointed one.

Nash · « **Reply #271 on:** July 18, 2006, 09:47:43 PM »

In other words, no.

Sandman · « **Reply #272 on:** July 18, 2006, 09:50:45 PM »

In other words... Rove has done a lot LOT more than Carville.

midnight Target · « **Reply #273 on:** July 18, 2006, 10:05:03 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Furious
The shear sillines of our current political situation is evidenced by the fact that instead of folks rooting for the players, they are rooting for the chearleaders.

He r smart.

68Hawk · « **Reply #274 on:** July 19, 2006, 03:28:41 AM »

lukster

wikipedia is a sketchy source at best, and that article is extremely general. Find something credible.

Still it backs me up.

Quote me:
You're just lumping everything that's not rightwing together.

Whoever contributed that to wikipedia didn't know what they were talking about either.

bj229r · « **Reply #275 on:** July 19, 2006, 05:52:04 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
In other words... Rove has done a lot LOT more than Carville.

ok....how about something evil and/or illegal?

lukster · « **Reply #276 on:** July 19, 2006, 08:42:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68Hawk
lukster

wikipedia is a sketchy source at best, and that article is extremely general. Find something credible.

Still it backs me up.

Quote me:
You're just lumping everything that's not rightwing together.

Whoever contributed that to wikipedia didn't know what they were talking about either.

I can't speak for lazs but as I've said before, many of today's self proclaimed "liberals" are well entrenched in their ideology. This is largely due to wanting power for their political party. This ideology can accurately be described as socialistic. Labels mean little, the proof is in the pudding.

lazs2 · « **Reply #277 on:** July 19, 2006, 08:59:39 AM »

Liberal socialist is at least as legitimate a term as "neocon" or any of the other new terms.

As was pointed out.... a liberal in the U.S. is heavily into socialism... rather than being a contradiction in terms... Liberal socialist can.... at best... be called

Redundant.

The leveling of the social playing field is the goal of the socialist and the liberal. I believe that you simply do not like being outed.

and for good reason.... it is a rare American that wants to be called a liberal or a socialist... they have (and rightly so) become curse words..

I, like many Americans, am not "right wing" but... and individualist. The country was formed with individualist ideals and they stay with us to this day....

"Right wing" or "neo con" or even "libertarian" are not terms that gag an individualist so much as being called either a Liberal or a socialist.

Liberal socialist implies loss of freedom for an individualist... loss to the group and forced fitting in. It implies a womanly type of rule like a strict mother. It reeks of being effeminate and weak and.....

In most Americans eyes... dishonest and sneaky.

It is no wonder that liberal socialists do not like the term.

So... think of a new one. that is really what the liberal socialists are good at.... 1984 speak.... big brother.

lazs

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #278 on:** July 19, 2006, 01:01:25 PM »

Except.... neoconservatives are socialists.

lazs2 · « **Reply #279 on:** July 19, 2006, 02:33:38 PM »

funked... all government becomes socialist when it achieves enough power... Big government is allways the demon.

There are two ways to reach this state of tyranny.... you can start out with liberal socialist ideals and the government will grow in size and power to accomadate you.. or...

You can simply grow the government in power and have it eventually control all social issues..

Either way... a weak government is your friend and a powerful one is your enemy.

lazs

BGBMAW · « **Reply #280 on:** July 19, 2006, 02:48:50 PM »

5- Flamebaiting, trolling, or posting to incite or annoy is not allowed.

lazs2 · « **Reply #281 on:** July 20, 2006, 08:57:50 AM »

and... I do got to ask... what is a neocon? I know several people have defined it but the defenition is never the same. Is there some generaly agreed upon defenition?

lazs

xrtoronto · « **Reply #282 on:** July 20, 2006, 09:56:36 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
and... I do got to ask... what is a neocon? I know several people have defined it but the defenition is never the same. Is there some generaly agreed upon defenition?

lazs

Neo- — ... is a prefix, derived from Greek that means new or recent, or in a modern form.
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-

therefore: neo-new

con-conservative

= new conservatives

lukster · « **Reply #283 on:** July 20, 2006, 11:13:46 AM »

I have to admit that I didn't even know Adam Corolla had a show until he hung up on Ann Coulter. The Man Show was pretty funny for a while, in a sophmoric sort of way. Is his radio show any good?

T0J0 · « **Reply #284 on:** July 20, 2006, 11:45:11 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by FUNKED1
Now imagine if Bubba had done something really bad, like 20,000 casualties and $300 billion expense over some trumped up bull****!

Imagine if Bubba had done anything other then chase split tail around the oval office.... Other then witness tampering, obstruction of justice, and attempted rape.... Or other then giving defense secrets to china, or screwing up the North Korea issue... Hindsight being what it is you know...

Your more likely to be killed driving a car in texas then serving in Iraq by a cell phone using texan motorist.
2001
deaths in texas = 3739
Injuries = 340,555

Thats just one state....!!

Where is the outrage? Bush must be teh blame for this too?!!!

You were just fishing though right?

TJ