Author Topic: Cheney sued in CIA identity case (Read 2532 times)

Nash · « **Reply #120 on:** July 16, 2006, 04:10:43 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunston
But mainstream America agrees with alot more of the kinds of things I believe than what you believe so how can I be wrong 360 degrees?

Is that right?

................... Really?

I suggest you stick your finger back in your mouth then hold it up to the wind to guage what's actually going on.

GOD do I ever hate Ohio.....

Shuckins · « **Reply #121 on:** July 16, 2006, 06:32:34 AM »

Nash ole bud, I'm beginning to think that your credo is "NeverneverneverEVER yield a point...for then the argument is OVER."

For you, the argument itself is the be-all and end-all of bulletin board existence.

In this case, if it goes to court, the facts will out, and rumor and political innuendo will be exposed for what they are. Personally, having read all the crap posted on these boards and in the media, I don't think Plame has a leg to stand on...but that's not for me to decide.

Regards, Shuckins

bj229r · « **Reply #122 on:** July 16, 2006, 07:17:54 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by dhaus
Well, SOMEBODY heard of Wilson - this administration sent him on the trip. And, even if the right wingers are correct that Wilson lied - and I'm still not statisfied he did (still looking at the Comittee Report)

I'm looking at the committee report, but it's in adobe (looks to have been scanned)...and it won't allow text copying/pasting...page 49 begins the story of the 'Former Ambassador'.Does anyone know how to convert a .pdf to rich text or something? It's 598 pages

http://intelligence.senate.gov/iraqreport2.pdf

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #123 on:** July 16, 2006, 08:26:02 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash

But you got it all wrong.

And by wrong I pretty much mean three hundred and sixty degrees of wrong. Wrong in every direction you look. If you spun around in circles your world would become a dizzying blur of wrong.

There's nothing I could tell ya here in a post on the AH BBS to fix that. I wouldn't even know where to start.

I suspect that it's a cultural thing. Maybe it goes back to something yer folks told ya that you can't let go of. And even that is just stabbin' in the dark... I have no idea.

But allow me to be honest with you.....

There is something frightening about a stranger calling you a wacko, an enemy of the state. It's psycho, okay?

And just WTF do you know?

But don't ever label me and expect me to show you any respect.

You're in the minority now.... got that? I'm not radical.... you are. If you need any advice on how to cope with that, I can help ya out.

I know a thing or two about it.

Oh dear God! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Sure Nash. You don't label people or question their mental state. LOOK UP IN THIS VERY FREAKING THREAD!

Give me a break, what you posted has to be the most self righteous Bravo Sierra I've seen in months, maybe years. It's almost over the top for even you.

No, he is not the minority, and he's not radical. He's actually just a vocal portion of the majority. I doubt he needs advice from you on how to cope either.

Sandman · « **Reply #124 on:** July 16, 2006, 10:35:29 AM »

According to Fox/Opinion Dynamics only 36% of those polled approve of Bush. 53% disapprove and 11% are clueless.

bj229r · « **Reply #125 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:10:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
According to Fox/Opinion Dynamics only 36% of those polled approve of Bush. 53% disapprove and 11% are clueless.

Therefore.......?

Sandman · « **Reply #126 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:35:47 PM »

I'm just wondering what constitutes a majority around here. Evidently 36% is enough.

Sandman · « **Reply #127 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:46:32 PM »

I've met a few people that see the "battle of Liberalism and Conservatism" as a battle between good and evil.

I try not to talk to them and I sincerely hope they don't represent "mainstream" America because IMHO, they are lunatics regardless of what side they choose.

bj229r · « **Reply #128 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:50:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
I'm just wondering what constitutes a majority around here. Evidently 36% is enough.

Ahh cc..the thing is, the numbers mean little unless you compare him to a specific person. (Kerry..Gore?) I see the numbers trotted out quite often, but of what significance are they? The numbers mean ALL the libs hate him, and SOME of the GOP....and the GOP issue is more the border then anythig else, IMO. People complain about gas prices, and try to attribute them to Bush's 'oil buddies'....but 50% of the cost of a gallon of gas IS the price of oil, and I don't see how one can do enough verbal gymnastics to blame what Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Hezbollah do on Bush.

Sandman · « **Reply #129 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:58:23 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by bj229r
Ahh cc..the thing is, the numbers mean little unless you compare him to a specific person. (Kerry..Gore?) I see the numbers trotted out quite often, but of what significance are they? The numbers mean ALL the libs hate him, and SOME of the GOP....and the GOP issue is more the border then anythig else, IMO. People complain about gas prices, and try to attribute them to Bush's 'oil buddies'....but 50% of the cost of a gallon of gas IS the price of oil, and I don't see how one can do enough verbal gymnastics to blame what Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Hezbollah do on Bush.

IMHO, gas prices are high because demand is inelastic. It's economics not politics... but that's another thread.

Gunston · « **Reply #130 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:19:54 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
I've met a few people that see the "battle of Liberalism and Conservatism" as a battle between good and evil.

I try not to talk to them and I sincerely hope they don't represent "mainstream" America because IMHO, they are lunatics regardless of what side they choose.

Let’s think about this Liberalism, Communism, and Socialism all pretty much the same ideology, to make the individual sub servant to the state. Ted Kennedy himself said “we are at war against individualism” they want me, you, and everyone else (except of course the ruling class) to become disposable cogs in one great societal machine. They wish to take the fruits of our labor by force, to use as they see fit, and not for the benefit of ourselves or our families. The list of desire’s the left has to destroy everything this country was founded on is long and terrifying. Yea I agree with Reagan when he said the Soviet Union was an Evil Empire. The Left in America represents the infiltration of those beliefs into our Society.

Gunston · « **Reply #131 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:35:40 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by bj229r
I'm looking at the committee report, but it's in adobe (looks to have been scanned)...and it won't allow text copying/pasting...page 49 begins the story of the 'Former Ambassador'.Does anyone know how to convert a .pdf to rich text or something? It's 598 pages

http://intelligence.senate.gov/iraqreport2.pdf

bj229
Thanks for the link, good stuff I never read the whole report before. Guess the "He Lied" crowd is going to have to adopt a new mantra.

Dago · « **Reply #132 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:48:47 PM »

4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.

Gunston · « **Reply #133 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:57:35 PM »

4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.

Sandman · « **Reply #134 on:** July 16, 2006, 04:11:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunston
Ted Kennedy himself said “we are at war against individualism”

LOL... I'm going to need a little more than a four-year old quote taken out of context to get my underwear all knotted up. Maybe some kool-aid will do the trick.

Congressional Record

I wonder what the mainstream wants...