Rigormortis doesnt even begin to set in until several hours after death and some of those corpses had full blown rigormortis which doesnt happen for 12 - 24 hours after death.
AFAIK it happens faster in warmer temperatures.
However, what none of the conspiracy blogs seem to have mentioned is that the building didn't collapse at 8am.
The IDF bombed the building at about 1 am, according to both the IDF and the eyewitnesses.
The IDF said in a briefing the next day that:
"I can't say whether the house collapsed at 12 A.M. or at 8 A.M.," said Eshel. "According to foreign press reports, and this is one of the reports we are relying on, the house collapsed at 8 A.M. We do not have testimony regarding the time of the collapse. If the house collapsed at 12 A.M., it is difficult for me to believe that they waited eight hours to evacuate it."
In fact, the Lebanese Red Cross first received a call for assistance at 7am, but eyewitnesses in the village said the building collapsed about 1am, about 10 minutes after the first strike (and there may not have been a second, what they report as a second explosion may have been the building collapsing)
There's no actual evidence the building collapsed at 7am, and a delay of 6 hours in getting the attention of the Red Cross doesn't seem that remarkable considering the number of buildings that have colllapsed in Lebanon in the last few weeks, and the probable state of telephone communications in Qana.
If the media and rescue workers had no difficulties getting to Qana from Tyre, why couldnt civilians leave?
Perhaps they haven't got transport? Perhaps they have nowhere else to go? Perhaps they thought they'd be safer staying put, rather than risk being bombed on the road?
All pictures of the *rescue workers* show people in clean clothes. How do your clothes not get dirty and bloody from rescue attempts in that type of environment.
This seems the most ridiculous claim of all.
Watching the BBC video report, the rescuers don't seem particulary clean or dirty. But the men the BBC actually shows digging in the rubble don't seem any dirtier, and whatever caused the explosion, they are actually pulling rubble aside. So either the rubble is carefully engineered polystyrene, or that's how dirty you get moving rubble.
So, is the claim:
A: that it isn't real rubble
B: that Hezbollah put the bodies in an intact building, then blew it up, then pulled the bodies out for the world's press
C: that Hezbollah put bodies in the rubble of an already collapsed building, then pulled the bodies out for the world's press?
Either B or C will have "rescue workers" looking just as dirty as real rescue workers, so the claim they look too clean is just stupid. A is just too bizarre for words.