The real deal.
Note: NASA "stuff" included.
Can you say sham children?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Bush denies funding to international abortion groups, the UN issues another dire warning about global warming. Yet, global warming is a myth.
On January 22, 2001 as pro-lifers descended on Washington, DC for the annual National Right To Life March on the U.S. Supreme Court, President George W. Bush, in one of his first meaningful presidential acts, rescinded an Executive Order issued by Bill Clinton (who himself rescinded a similar Executive Order issued by Ronald Reagan in 1984) in 1993 that allowed tax-payer dollars to be used for abortion.
iiiiiWithin hours of the Bush Executive Order, the United Nations (meeting in Shanghai, China) countered the Bush declaration with one of their own by declaring in the most forceful statement yet that the threat of global warming was much more imminent than previously thought. The report, released to the media on January 23 in Beijing, predicted that the human element affecting global warming would trigger brutal droughts, floods, and violent storms across the planet over the next century because of human-caused air pollution is causing surface temperatures on the planet to rise faster than previously anticipated.
iiiiiThe report speculated (as fact) that the Earth's average temperature would rise as much as 10.4 degrees over the next 100 years. This is 60% higher than the same group predicted less than six years ago. "The scientific consensus presented in this comprehensive report about human-induced climate change should sound alarm bells in every national capital and in every local community," Klaus Topfler, head of the UN Environmental Programme, "We should start preparing now."
iiiiiPreparing, of course, means funding more abortions--particularly in the poverty-strickened third world nations with overwhelmingly high birth rates and an absense of birth control means of any type.
iiiiiThe new report was issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 100 ecoalarmist scientists who were pulled together by the UN in 1988
to assess global warming. (While it might seem strange that the UN was holding its annual environmental strategy meetings in the most socialist nation on Earth, it is important to understand that in 1998, in a private meeting in the White House, Vice President Al Gore told Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji that he would give China whatever it wanted if Beijing would agree to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. Of course, what China wanted was better access to America's top military secrets, more super computers to perfect the systems created from the stolen weapons secrets--and even better access into America's consumer markets. Did Zhu get what he wanted? When Zhu addressed the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, a pro-China New York think tank in 1999, he told the panda-huggers in attendance that it was a good investment for China.)
iiiiiThe question is: is Global Warming a real threat as the ecoalarmists say, or is it a myth as a minority of climatologists in the United States claim? It is good politics, we all know that. And, it solves a problem for the transnationalist industrialists who need to transfer entire industries from the United States and other industrialized nations into the emerging third world countries where the UN's jobless human capital (and tomorrow's consumers) live without creating a backlash that will cause Americans and Europeans to boycott their goods as they build the new economies of the third world (but must rely on the consumers in the industrialized nations to buy those products until the third world economies have developed sufficiently).
The Myth of Global Warming
iiiiiAsk anyone who spent the winter of 2000-2001 in Central Russia if they believe in global warming, and you will likely here the response: "Nyet!" from everyone you ask. The temperatures plummeted to 75 degrees below zero and colder (-40C to -53C) in early December and remained there through January, creating unbelievable hardships that were reminescent of the Mongolian winter of 1999-2000 when the thermometer dropped to -50 degrees Farenheit in October in Mongolia, and remained in sub-zero numbers throughout most of the winter. During that tragic arctic winter in which snow cover, as well as the density and duration of it, remained abnormally high, UN relief organizations and the International Red Cross estimated that over 300 thousand camels, goats, yaks, sheep and horses--animals that are central to the Mongolian economy--died each week. Hospitals in the populated areas of Mongolia reported greatly increased admissions of the very young and the elderly suffering from cold-related illnesses, and the international wire services reported an epic increase of starvation-related deaths. Yet, not one whisper of the Mongolian tragedy, or the fact that Asia was experiencing its earliest or coldest winter of the cenutry touched the American media.
iiiiiWhen the ecoalarmists first advanced the theory that the world was heading towards an inexorable phase of mankind-induced planetary warming that would have a devastating impact on the entire world, many in the scientific community shook their heads and ignored the rantings because they viewed them as too ridiculous to challenge. Since that time, the agenda of those behind the scare has become all too clear--and the threat to America all too great--that it can no longer be ignored, althought it now appears it may be too late to stop the fully-loaded environmental freight train as it gains speed on its downhill run to execution.
iiiiiAnti-green environmental groups--as well as the government itself--have tracked the globe's average monthly temperatures since 1979, when NASA satellite temperature
record-keeping began. NASA temperature tracking is important because that data is real.
iiiiiGlobal satellite measurements are made from a series of orbiting platforms that record the average temperature in various atmospheric layers. Temperatures at levels between 5,000 and 28,000 feet are measured by weather balloons which feed the data to the satellite which, in turn, feeds the data back to NASA. These measurements are accurate to within 0.001C, and provide climatologists with more uniform data--in a more universal manner for the entire globe--and is far more reliable than the measurements taken on land, or the wild guesses of political pundits whose agenda necessitates global warming.
iiiiiNASA's global temperature tracking between 1979 and 1998 reveal the typical weather anomalies--unseasonably hot summers and warmer winters--during that period; but overall, NASA data from 1979 forward clearly shows there has been no sustained planetary warming. Nor has any been recorded in all of the years that weather tracking data has been compiled. In fact, during the very mild winters that North America experienced since the El Nino winter of 1998, the global temperature departure has been -0.094 degrees.
iiiiiFrom the Rio Earth Summit forward Americans have been bombarded with a virtual plethora of articles, books, and newspaper articles on the need to reduce greenhouse gases--mainly carbon dioxide. The greenhouses gases, Americans are being told, are the real culprits behind global warming. And, we have been warned, greenhouse gases are rising. They are rising, we have been told, because of us--people. People who consume fossil fuels. People who destroy trees. People who consume too much space. Yet, with or without the proposed UN Global Warming Treaty (which Clinton and Gore partially implemented through the EPA before leaving office), increased carbon dioxide levels is a foregone conclusion--even if every fossil fuel was outlawed overnight in every nation of the world. The human race is responsible for greenhouse gas emissions only to the extent that our increased productivity of the land [i.e., modern agriculture] has caused atmospheric carbon dioxide to rise, allowing plantlife and fauna to become more abundant. The biomass in dryland areas of America are expanding the native fauna where none had previously existed simply because, with previously lower carbon dioxide levels, it couldn't grow. Plant life feeds on carbon dioxide, creating oxygen as a byproduct. And humans, you know, require oxygen to live.
iiiiiDue to the cries of the ecoalarmists, scientists have been monitoring the increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for much of the past decade, and have closely studied its "impact" on the environment. Most have been astounded by what they have witnessed based on the doomsday cries of the climatic doomsayers. Most have written on the subject in America's prominent ecological periodicals, but apparently the doomsayers, who claim to be scientific environmentalists, don't read those publications.
iiiiiA multitude of studies which have been conducted by several unbiased climatic experts and biologists alike indicate that the increased levels of carbon dioxide that triggered the "cimatic crisis" are indicative only of better crop yields, expanding fauna, and a richer habitat for wildlife--not exactly the best ammunition in the world from which to create an apocalyptic nightmare. But, for those who have managed to successfully politicize a make-believe crisis into a catastrophe waiting to happen, you have to do the best you can with what you have to work with.
