Author Topic: Tim Hardaway and his love of gays (Read 5768 times)

Mightytboy · « **Reply #120 on:** February 22, 2007, 07:02:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GtoRA2
So if you were born gay, you would spend your life with a woman you didn't find attractive because you would feel it was wrong to act on your sexual feelings? Probably making both of you miserable?

You think that’s fair to ask someone who had no choice in it?

That makes sense to you?

Well......Yes!

Do you think it's fair to tell pedophiles they can't do what seems natural to them? How about bestiality? How about all the people in the mental hospitals?

We all have feelings or impulses we were born with that should never be acted on.

For some reason Gays get a pass on their behavior. Not only that but now a days liberals seem to want to promote the behavior.

midnight Target · « **Reply #121 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:01:29 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mightytboy
Well......Yes!

Do you think it's fair to tell pedophiles they can't do what seems natural to them? How about bestiality? How about all the people in the mental hospitals?

We all have feelings or impulses we were born with that should never be acted on.

For some reason Gays get a pass on their behavior. Not only that but now a days liberals seem to want to promote the behavior.

Freakin amazing.

Hazzer · « **Reply #122 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:01:40 AM »

If you Hate A group of ppl simply because they're gay,err french ,black even though they have not ,nor intend to do you ,or anyone else any harm,then that says more about you than the ppl you Hate.Most intelligent ppl see no sense in that, it's not "pc" it's common sense,this man behaved like a bigot,he gets treated like a bigot,now he's back pedaling.I support his rights to freedom of speech, but don't expect a pat on the back!Hate destroys the Hater!

This has nothing to do with "pc".

Hazzer · « **Reply #123 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:06:22 AM »

Mightyboy,are you a single cell organism?

BTW · « **Reply #124 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:24:50 AM »

How many here actually like the effeminate behavior that is generally defined as homosexual type behavior. I'm talking about that catty style critique from Steven "Cojo" Cojocaru , or that bunch from "Queer eye." What about when Richard Simmons starts prancing around?

I'm sorry, I don't like it at all and to say I do would be lie. So something is wrong with me? I find that behavior outrageous and gross and all of a sudden I'm a bigot. The agenda is not to accept that a percentage of the population will be homosexual. The agenda is to make overt homosexual behavior stylish and sophisticated. Sorry- guess I'll have to be a bigot. I'm not the one stepping all over people here.

lazs2 · « **Reply #125 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:27:02 AM »

BTW... you said...

"I believe pretty much what the scientific consensus states, that sexuality is formed from genetics, chemistry, and environment.

Ok... so.. If I can read then.. you believe that at least some part of it is genetic.. that you are born that way? That you believe that there is either more to genetics than DNA or that, since we have not found the gay gene... that we don't know all there is to know about DNA?

Your answer says that, even after all the tap dancing, you believe that at least to some extent... a homo is born that way.

I have 4 brothers the youngest is gay... It would seem that thrawn's post nailed it in my family... The second from the last was also gay and died of aids in the 80's

Point is.. if someone is born some way then it is unatural for them to act (behavior) any other way.

Because of my brother(s), I have known a lot of gays over the years. I can't even imagine that they were not born the way they are.

I have no idea of what your original post was for in any case.

lazs

Saintaw · « **Reply #126 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:32:59 AM »

I really don't get what you lot are whining about. It's all good as far as I am concerned, because:

A - More male homos = more female for us men with hairy chests.
B - More female homos = more lesbian pr0n!

lazs2 · « **Reply #127 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:34:45 AM »

BTW...

"Originally posted by midnight Target
Homosexuality is not a "behavior". It is part of what a person is and is no different than eye color or skin color or using your left hand to write.

And yes I'm rubbing it in.

So say you. But that is the debate about sexuality - is it learned behavior, genetic, or a combination. Glad you figured it out. How do you explain identical twins of different sexual orientations?"

This is your post.. you are asking not telling us that it is a combination.. you then go on to say that DNA is everything and identical twins have identical DNA yet one can be gay and one not so therefore...

So therefore... what? you seem to be saying (earlier) that genetics have nothing to do with it.

Now you seem to be saying that... well... even tho genetics are strictly DNA identical DNA can breed homo or hetro (is hetro mean to heterosexuals?).

Are you saying that one of the twins that is homo is just pretending to be?

That one or the other of the twins is lying about his sexuality and was not born the way he is?

Are you.. at the bottom line.. saying that sexuality is so fragile that we can program it?

lazs

BTW · « **Reply #128 on:** February 22, 2007, 08:50:43 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
BTW...

"Originally posted by midnight Target
Homosexuality is not a "behavior". It is part of what a person is and is no different than eye color or skin color or using your left hand to write.

And yes I'm rubbing it in.

So say you. But that is the debate about sexuality - is it learned behavior, genetic, or a combination. Glad you figured it out. How do you explain identical twins of different sexual orientations?"

This is your post.. you are asking not telling us that it is a combination.. you then go on to say that DNA is everything and identical twins have identical DNA yet one can be gay and one not so therefore...

So therefore... what? you seem to be saying (earlier) that genetics have nothing to do with it.

Now you seem to be saying that... well... even tho genetics are strictly DNA identical DNA can breed homo or hetro (is hetro mean to heterosexuals?).

Are you saying that one of the twins that is homo is just pretending to be?

That one or the other of the twins is lying about his sexuality and was not born the way he is?

Are you.. at the bottom line.. saying that sexuality is so fragile that we can program it?

lazs

In that post, I'm stating what the debate is. You have people that believe its strictly genetics, strictly environment and those that believe its a complex combination of chemistry, genetics, and environment. MT seemed to believe it was all genetic thats why I brought up identical twins as that is one argument used against the idea of homosexuality being strictly genetic- like race. In another post on the same day, I stated I agree with the scientific consensus that states sexuality is a combination of of three factors, genetics, chemistry and environment. So again, you can't find where I have ever stated genetics was not a factor because I never said that and would never say that. I said it isn't the ONLY factor. I've answered the rest of the questions already.

I've never tapped danced around anything. You have purposely tried to distort what I've said, and I haven't let you:aok

lazs2 · « **Reply #129 on:** February 22, 2007, 09:03:03 AM »

so you have no position other than it is possible that gays are maybe born that way to some extent?

Does it work the same way for hetros? is it just a minor thing in our genetics and those urges and desires are false... fed by what the people around us are doing?

How much do you think is genetics? what is chemistry in your view? and how much is "environment"?

What does "environment" mean to you? I still don't even know what "genetics" means to you.... if you agree that identical twins may be influenced differently by "genetics" in their sexual orientation but then say that the DNA is identical and all there is to "genetics" then you make no sense.

I can't follow you. You do indeed seem to be tap dancing. If a person is born with a sexual preference...one way or the other then it is natural and he will have that behavior or be dennying his being his self. He will create his environment in my opinion.

Would you agree that child born hetro who was raised by homo's would remain hetro?

lazs

BTW · « **Reply #130 on:** February 22, 2007, 09:47:00 AM »

All answered. I you didn't get it the first time you won't get it the second time.
I do want to thank you for completely crapping all over this thread. I guess you don't like the subject so no one else should discuss it.

Mightytboy · « **Reply #131 on:** February 22, 2007, 10:27:52 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hazzer
If you Hate A group of ppl simply because they're gay,err french ,black even though they have not ,nor intend to do you ,or anyone else any harm,then that says more about you than the ppl you Hate.Most intelligent ppl see no sense in that, it's not "pc" it's common sense,this man behaved like a bigot,he gets treated like a bigot,now he's back pedaling.I support his rights to freedom of speech, but don't expect a pat on the back!Hate destroys the Hater!

This has nothing to do with "pc".

This has everything to do with being PC.

Gays are mentally ill and should be treated that way but the PC crowd wants to change it to make it seem that some how being a fruit is OK and that everyone should not only accept them they should be admired for having the courage to be a fruit.

Your assumtion that gays "do no harm" is wrong. Everytime you see a fruit prancing on tv or on the street it sends the message to our kids that it's ok to give into your feelings no matter how depraived and sick they are. There are no boundries because if it's OK to openly show you are a fruit then why hide the rest of your feelings.

Feel like killing kids at school? Why not? If fruits can be shown as role models then why not give in to the other urges?

Hazzer · « **Reply #132 on:** February 22, 2007, 10:52:07 AM »

You know,the ppl posting on here have more in common with the intolerant muslims they claim to hate,and are currently fighting,than I think they realize,most of you would find sharia law suits them just fine.

And err mightyboy to compare a consensual sexual act with that of a peidophile shows just how far down the foodchain you are.

Of course homosexual women are perfectly natural,I notice none of you geniuses,have tried to find sicence to back that up.maybe your hand is to busy doing another unatural act.

midnight Target · « **Reply #133 on:** February 22, 2007, 10:55:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mightytboy
This has everything to do with being PC.

Gays are mentally ill and should be treated that way but the PC crowd wants to change it to make it seem that some how being a fruit is OK and that everyone should not only accept them they should be admired for having the courage to be a fruit.

Your assumtion that gays "do no harm" is wrong. Everytime you see a fruit prancing on tv or on the street it sends the message to our kids that it's ok to give into your feelings no matter how depraived and sick they are. There are no boundries because if it's OK to openly show you are a fruit then why hide the rest of your feelings.

Feel like killing kids at school? Why not? If fruits can be shown as role models then why not give in to the other urges?

This has to be a troll.

If not, it shuld be posted on every bulletin board in every school in America as a reminder of the intolerance we all need to guard against. There are way too many people who think like this.

Hazzer · « **Reply #134 on:** February 22, 2007, 10:57:27 AM »

Of course onanism,causes low IQ,so none of you could possibly be.....Oh...hang on:confused: