Author Topic: Al Qaeda lost (Read 3812 times)

john9001 · « **Reply #30 on:** September 25, 2007, 05:30:23 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Soviet

No terrorist was attacking America before we decided to abuse our super power state by policing the world and trying to control politics in the Middle East.

so it's all America's fault?

Viking · « **Reply #31 on:** September 25, 2007, 05:33:40 PM »

Still clutching at straws I see. Perhaps Osama took the WMD ... or perhaps Hillary!

Tango · « **Reply #32 on:** September 25, 2007, 05:43:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Soviet
I'm not a democrat so i'm not being "Brainwashed" From the Democratic party. Where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction. Where are they? We went to WAR over that and they weren't there. We were lied to, I can't see how it could be any more clear.

Exactly where are the weapons [chemical and Bio] we know he DID have? Those are the wepons he used on the Kurds.

RedTop · « **Reply #33 on:** September 25, 2007, 05:48:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Soviet
I'm not a partisan. Anyone responsible should be brought to justice, republican, democrat, or independent

Great:rolleyes:

There goes Washington....

Tango · « **Reply #34 on:** September 25, 2007, 05:49:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Soviet
Oh and I'm not calling Bush the only liar, he's not the only lying politician out there.

If this is so then why are you singling out Bush administration?

Quote

Originally posted by Soviet
The bottom line is, why hasn't the administration been charged with misleading the American public to war? They told us there were WMDs in Iraq and that turned out to be a flat out lie. We invaded because we had undeniable intelligence according to those in charge. They should be held accountable for this misjudgment and for destroying the lives of thousands of Americans and wasting billions of taxpayer Dollars.

He had the same intelligence as the previous administration and the rest of the world.

So please post a link showing proof that he lied and intentionally lead us into this or just keep ranting since thats what liberals like to do instead of coming up with proof.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #35 on:** September 25, 2007, 06:02:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Viking
Still clutching at straws I see. Perhaps Osama took the WMD ... or perhaps Hillary!

no. But Im not stupid enough to allow myself into being duped into thinking that just because we didnt fnd em. means that he didnt have them.

Or are you trying to use the "if the glove doesnt fit you must aquit" standard?

but then again. it worked for OJ so..

Hey maybe OJ took em

Viking · « **Reply #36 on:** September 25, 2007, 06:09:58 PM »

I'm more of a "innocent until proven guilty" standard guy. The so called "proof" your government presented in the UN SC was laughable and no one believed you. France didn't even have to veto. You wanted this war, and you got it. Reap it.

Tango · « **Reply #37 on:** September 25, 2007, 06:26:22 PM »

So your saying Saddam was innocent? Tell that to the people that he gased.

VOR · « **Reply #38 on:** September 25, 2007, 06:33:17 PM »

Without the aid of external reference, name 3 people Saddam gassed.

Dago · « **Reply #39 on:** September 25, 2007, 06:34:01 PM »

Whenever there is any good news out of Iraq, I can imagine MT with his hands over his ears saying "lalalalalalalalalal" over and over.

Tango · « **Reply #40 on:** September 25, 2007, 06:36:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by VOR
Without the aid of external reference, name 3 people Saddam gassed.

So your saying there were no Kurds gased by Saddam? Next your going to say there was no Holocaust.

VOR · « **Reply #41 on:** September 25, 2007, 06:41:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tango
So your saying there were no Kurds gased by Saddam? Next your going to say there was no Holocaust.

No. I'm trying to decide how important the Kurdish plight really was to you.

Tango · « **Reply #42 on:** September 25, 2007, 07:12:03 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by VOR
No. I'm trying to decide how important the Kurdish plight really was to you.

How important was the Jewish plight for you?

I guess not much.

Nashwan · « **Reply #43 on:** September 25, 2007, 07:48:09 PM »

Anbar is quieter than it was, but 157 US troops have still been killed there so far this year (it's been averaging 350 per full year in the past), so I'd hardly describe it as "quiet as a mouse".

On the other hand, 359 Americans have been killed in Baghdad so far this year, compared to 265 in the whole of 2006 (and 229 in 2004).

Overall, US casualties are up by a large amount this year, so I can't quite understand the claims that they are down due to the "surge". August was the second worst August for US deaths since the war started. July was the worst July, June the worst June, May the worst May, April the second worst April, March the worst March.

clerick · « **Reply #44 on:** September 25, 2007, 09:16:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Soviet
I'm not a partisan. Anyone responsible should be brought to justice, republican, democrat, or independent

By using the word justice you imply that there was something illegal. There is no proof of that, only the biased rantings of groups like Moveon.org who have a far left agenda.

The truth is that Saddam DID have WMD's at one point and they found many sites, shortly after the invasion, where they had been produced. Saddam just willingly giving up WMD and nuclear research is far fetched at best. Since people like to assume this ridiculous notion, i will assume a more plausible one; Saddam moved them as a political move. Make the coalition look foolish to garner support, and it worked.