« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 13   Go Down

Author Topic: P-47M  (Read 6123 times)

Offline slimmer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 272
Re: P-47M
« Reply #45 on: April 19, 2009, 06:01:46 AM »
 :rock +1  :salute
Logged
Member: Hot Soup Mafia -chokin chickin noodle
 Army of Muppets

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: P-47M
« Reply #46 on: April 19, 2009, 09:10:39 AM »
I'd love to see this A/C :D  :aok
Logged
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: P-47M
« Reply #47 on: April 19, 2009, 09:49:25 AM »
me too!!
 again!!
 i wonder how many times i have posted in this thread?
o well
like the song says "Squeak, squeak" the squeaky wheel gets the grease!!!
Logged
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: P-47M
« Reply #48 on: April 20, 2009, 09:24:50 AM »
Quote from: Bronk on January 19, 2009, 03:32:31 PM
P-47M 130 produced, squadron strength  and was in combat..
Ta-152  90-93 produced, squadron strength and was in combat.

Please explain why the M should not be done?

Amen I say to you.
Logged
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"
Axis vs Allies

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: P-47M
« Reply #49 on: April 20, 2009, 09:33:06 AM »
Quote from: Bronk on January 19, 2009, 03:32:31 PM
P-47M 130 produced, squadron strength  and was in combat..
Ta-152  90-93 produced, squadron strength and was in combat.

Please explain why the M should not be done?
Look at the US planeset and then look at other nation's planesets.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: P-47M
« Reply #50 on: April 20, 2009, 09:39:29 AM »
P-47M  +1  :aok
Logged
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4206
Re: P-47M
« Reply #51 on: April 20, 2009, 11:01:44 AM »
+1, the blue camo looks very nice.
Logged

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: P-47M
« Reply #52 on: April 20, 2009, 11:08:29 AM »
Yes to the M Jug! :aok
Logged
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: P-47M
« Reply #53 on: April 20, 2009, 12:48:32 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on April 20, 2009, 09:33:06 AM
Look at the US planeset and then look at other nation's planesets.

And 1/3rd of those U.S. planes are bombers and a cargo plane. *yawn* All of which, if they were removed from the game tomorrow, I would barely notice. Fighters my man, lets stick to planes actually worth caring about. :devil

The plane sets you will call limited, Russian and Japanese, yes they may be numerically smaller but these numbers include many of the best-modeled planes for typical MA conditions. Some of the latest, rarest, and/or highest-performance variants built, but the USAAF is stuck with 1944-eque performance for its P-51Ds and P-47D-40s
Logged
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: P-47M
« Reply #54 on: April 20, 2009, 01:11:11 PM »
And the IJA is stuck with a lower powered Ki-84-Ia instead of a Ki-84-Ib with a bit more power and better guns.

There are also many other missing aircraft from the Japanese, Russian, Italian, German and British sets.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: P-47M
« Reply #55 on: April 20, 2009, 01:33:10 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on April 20, 2009, 01:11:11 PM
And the IJA is stuck with a lower powered Ki-84-Ia instead of a Ki-84-Ib with a bit more power and better guns.

There are also many other missing aircraft from the Japanese, Russian, Italian, German and British sets.

I agree that some tweaks to the Ki-84 wouldn't hurt....
Logged
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: P-47M
« Reply #56 on: April 20, 2009, 03:39:07 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on April 20, 2009, 09:33:06 AM
Look at the US planeset and then look at other nation's planesets.

Yeah I notice that half the German Luftwaffe is composed of 109s and another quarter of it is composed of 190s. Whats your point?
Logged
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"
Axis vs Allies

Offline GGhost

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 242
      • 79TH FIGHTER GROUP - FALCONS
Re: P-47M
« Reply #57 on: April 26, 2009, 08:35:15 AM »
Quote from: LLogann on January 13, 2009, 03:40:43 PM
Why do you want a plane that failed?

The M saw very little action and was eventually terminated.  The other M prototype became the first N prototype....


The 56th Fighter Group had the P47M in operational combat. They were the only unit that the P47M saw action in the war. The unit loved them. The manufacture lighten up on the airframe and had a more powerful engine. And they did see escort, dogfighting ...etc with the 56th FG.

Need to do some more searching. Read a book wiki is not always right.
Logged
Currently not flying

Offline fyvsix

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 149
Re: P-47M
« Reply #58 on: April 27, 2009, 08:41:42 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on April 20, 2009, 09:33:06 AM
Look at the US planeset and then look at other nation's planesets.

It's a US made game with US servers and US offices which has a lot of US planes because that is what US paying customers (who are the majority) want.

Bring on the M! The sooner the better!
Logged
Schiling in game Cave Tonitrum!

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: P-47M
« Reply #59 on: April 27, 2009, 09:02:05 PM »
And US warbirds data is probably a lot more accessible.. Nonetheless the game is better off having relatively balanced representation.
Logged
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 13   Go Up
« previous next »