Author Topic: Me 210/410  (Read 9759 times)

Offline FTJR

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #105 on: June 25, 2009, 10:23:50 AM »
That is all I need, Kazaa and Moot in 410's.. :(
Bring the Beaufighter to Aces High
Raw Prawns      

B.O.S.S. "Beaufighter Operator Support Services" 
Storms and Aeroplanes dont mix

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #106 on: June 25, 2009, 11:34:51 AM »
quick & dirty speed chart in context

The 110's in standard black and red.  The 410's mil and wep are pretty much guessed.  But that should be the ballpark.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #107 on: June 25, 2009, 01:37:12 PM »
the 410 has almost identical weight loading, hp loading, to the p-38, so even though it's slower (draggier) I'd expect it to at least be somewhat capable as a fighter.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #108 on: June 25, 2009, 02:33:33 PM »
Would anyone happen to know how well the ME410 would do in A2A engagements?

What would it’s best quality happen to be in that regard?


Like the 110 and the 210, would be outclassed by the majority of single engine fighters we have in the game.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #109 on: June 25, 2009, 07:05:48 PM »
I'm doing the math with the bits of info I have, and it looks like it might be as porky as the 110.  The powerloading on anything heavier than a MG131+MG151 equipped 410 is about as bad as the 110, and the wingloading is up there with the P38, which is pretty bad if you imagine a P38 with no counter-props and slotted flaps.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #110 on: June 25, 2009, 07:45:03 PM »
You want pork, try flying a 190 in a dogfight!

Doesn't matter how "bad" it is, it'll still be "great"!  :aok

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #111 on: June 26, 2009, 02:48:51 PM »
These are the weights worked out from AH and historical docs.  "Empty" weights are for a plane with no fuel and basic guns but no ammo and no ordnance.  "Dogfight" is weight with 25 or 50% fuel (all planes carrying about the same fuel-time), light guns and enough ammo to make ~ half a dozen A2A kills, provided you don't miss.  E.G. the Mossie with ~1000 .303 rounds and something like 400 20mm rounds, or the 410's 6x20 with only 175 rpg.  The BK5 loadout isn't what you'd dogfight with, but it's there for perspective anyway.  The 410 figures are optimistic: there will be more weight added for gun-carrying structures.



« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 03:00:41 PM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #112 on: June 26, 2009, 03:48:18 PM »
That can't be right.... 700 rds of MG151/20 doesn't equate to 700lbs...

In AH right now:

1x 20mm round = 0.486 lbs (times 700 rds = 340.2 lbs)
1x 30mm round = 1.3 lbs
1x 13mm round = 0.18 lbs (times 1200 rds = 96 lbs)

So the A-1 would have 436lbs, not 700lbs extra weight.
The 6-20mm version would have 972lbs.

Unless I'm missing something else, where's the extra weight from?

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #113 on: June 26, 2009, 04:04:50 PM »
700 odd pounds are the guns+ammo.  I removed guns, ammo, and fuel from a basic 410A, and then added 25% fuel (444kg) and the different gun loadouts + their ammo.

2xMG131+ammo+2xMG151+ammo=
74.8   195.36   184.8   298.76   = 753.72
6xMG151+2000 rounds=
554.4   853.6   = 1408

The figure that bothers me is the 410 weighing in at just about the same as a 110 in disarmed trim.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 04:07:14 PM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #114 on: June 26, 2009, 05:15:59 PM »
Moot, where do you have the 410 numbers for the speed vs. alt chart from?

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #115 on: June 26, 2009, 05:28:26 PM »
This doc. Page 10. 
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3555/3663936022_25bc3826a3_o.png
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3657/3663133099_da75313712_o.png
What I labeled as MIL is for a 9.5 ton Me410 at 1.3ata and 2500rpm.  The line labeled wep is a curve made from three points listed as top speed from Warplanes of the Luftwaffe.  315@SL, 388@22kft, 373@26kft.

Do you have better info?
« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 05:30:57 PM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #116 on: June 26, 2009, 05:45:45 PM »
The 110G has, what? 1350hp per engine? The 410 has almost 1800hp per engine. That's similar weights, but going from 2700hp total to 3600hp... I'd say that alone will make up for the weight.

As you show the MOSS and 110G have similar empty weights, but can still be jinked around the sky on occasion. I don't think anybody's going to say it'll compete with a spit16 (but then 90% of the planes in this game can't anyways), but it'll give US rides a run for their money, and maybe some other nations as well.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #117 on: June 26, 2009, 06:18:53 PM »
Like the 110 and the 210, would be outclassed by the majority of single engine fighters we have in the game.


ack-ack
AKAK, would you say the same for the Mossie?
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #118 on: June 26, 2009, 06:29:27 PM »
This doc. Page 10. 
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3555/3663936022_25bc3826a3_o.png
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3657/3663133099_da75313712_o.png
What I labeled as MIL is for a 9.5 ton Me410 at 1.3ata and 2500rpm.  The line labeled wep is a curve made from three points listed as top speed from Warplanes of the Luftwaffe.  315@SL, 388@22kft, 373@26kft.

Do you have better info?

Thanks! Do you have the complete document? like Points 12 and 13 on the 2nd pic?

P.S.
No, I have no infos at all, unfortunately. 

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 210/410
« Reply #119 on: June 26, 2009, 06:54:16 PM »
Yes, here.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you