Why should there be a difference between long and short range planes in favor of long ranged planes ?
Because there was a real world one that had similar influence on operations as it does have now in AH
It transform offensives planes like Yak9 and La7 in defensive planes and the Pee51 become a La7.
La-7 was a short ranged tactical fighter in "real world", and so it is in AH. They didn't roam deep behind enemy lines, as did P-51 for example. Same goes for the Spitfire.
not at all they were front line combat planes used as is by the Russians.
And so it is here.You don't really want to tell me a La-5 or 7 can't fly to the "front" and fight there in Ah2?
Plus the multiplier is not applied to altitude !
Because that's impossible to do. Which didn't prevent me from getting to 20+k and fly & fight over enemy bases in a Spit 14. Because in some respect. the distances in AH are even more compressed than 2.0
Just for the record, my main ride for my first months in AH2 was the LA-7, a definite short range fighter.