The 2% of the people who read the forums aren't going to change anything, this is true.
What I have trouble understanding when it comes to the HO vs Not HO and the 'Stay out of my duel!' mentality, is it's pretty contrary to what the MA is about, isn't it?
The MA, supposedly, is about taking enough bases for your side to win the war, right? Pretty much the most effective way to do that is by bullying the other side off their bases so you can capture it, right? That's generally done with numbers clashing overhead, not with a bracket of one on one duels to decide who gets to keep the base, right? Leaving the 'nobody bombs or troops' arguments aside...
Regardless of 'Honor' or what have you, the main objective of the arena is to push the other side around. If everybody in one of the countries upped an armada of Typhoons in front of B24s and C47s, and HO'ed everything in sight, they'd roll the map PDQ. Effective? Certainly. Fun and exciting? Not particularly. (Though it would be quite the sight to see...)
It just seems to me that the MA is designed around pushing the other side around more so than rewarding those with the most outstanding ACM capabilities. Certainly, killing people through superior ACM is a good way to go about things, but it is not always the most effective or efficient, depending on the situation. In the last week, I've been on the receiving end of some very effective demonstrations of what 3 or 4 fast cannon armed planes in the right hands can do to keep a field suppressed once it's deacked. Vulching? Sure. It's also awfully hard to mount an offensive from that field at that point.
Wiley.