Well, the parenthetical is an ad populum fallacy. Next, give a better, and more succinct explaination for the universe expanding in all directions.
On the #2 assertion basis, please give me well established matter of fact to compare our "educated guesses" to, so that we may better understand your assertion.
On your defenition of "Fact", 1. is more applicable to a real object than a fact; 2 and 3 are fine though. They are really the same thing if you think about it. You make an observation, and then confirm it with experience.
So Fact should read: Confirmed Observation.
Obviously any assertion relating to the origin of the universe could be viewed as untestable due to the fact that we can't go back and be there when it all started. Evolution, is the change of species over time, which was undeniably proven when our ancestors moved into Europe and developed lighter skin than their African counterparts. The argument that you would have to make, is something like this:
Because of observation
x, even unfavorable genes will be passed on; and reach levels of saturation equal to all other traits.
The problem is, that we would all probably have some sort of bizzare ailment like a 3rd arm, leg or lung (you could say that I do, I have 25% more left kidney than the average person of my age
).
Natural selection is the process by which the change comes about, and evolution is just the change.
-Penguin
PS: IN!
