Author Topic: bomber guns.....  (Read 11608 times)

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #105 on: July 07, 2010, 08:00:12 PM »
Then Ill attack your whine you sniveling dweeb. Since you admit your immaturity above.

That is your right. You are the CO of the company, and a board moderator; I can't stop you, and I'm no where near dumb enough to think I can.

You can not even understand the basic concept that war simulation and aircraft simulation are 2 completely different concepts.

I think do understand the difference. I wasn't asking for a change to the aircraft, I was (I no longer am. I've realized that this was a foolish thread, and I did a while ago) asking for the number of guns firing on the same target from one bomber to be limited to 3.

So grow up and ask for what you really want. I.E. you want bombers to be easier to kill because you are not skilled enough to be up to the task.

HiTech

I can't take back this thread. If I could, I would do it gladly. So seeing as I can't, I've done what I feel is best, and attempted to own up to what I did. What more would you have me do sir?
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #106 on: July 07, 2010, 08:15:03 PM »
What more would you have me do sir?
See Rule #4

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #107 on: July 07, 2010, 08:16:32 PM »
Ouch, remind me never to piss off HiTech!

Nemisis I dub thee Krusty Jr.

;)
Ohh now that's just down right mean. ;)
See Rule #4

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12320
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #108 on: July 07, 2010, 08:32:55 PM »
hmmmm.... that would be a good comeback if the game were more than 70% accurate, and if we didn't have spits fighting P-51's, and zeeks fighting Ki-61's. Unfortunatly for your argument, there has already been concessions for game play reasons.

Quote
I've done what I feel is best, and attempted to own up to what I did. What more would you have me do sir?

Stop making inaccurate statements about the realism of our aircraft simulation. Stop purposely mixing your claim about our choice in war simulation vs our uncompromising simulation of aircraft. Because we do not modify performance of simulations for game play.

HiTech

Offline uptown

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8566
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #109 on: July 07, 2010, 08:45:04 PM »
Sounds like Nemisis may want to change his location to "top of watermelon list". :D






« Last Edit: July 07, 2010, 08:49:58 PM by uptown »
Lighten up Francis

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #110 on: July 07, 2010, 08:47:19 PM »
Sounds like Nemisis may want to change his location to "top of watermelon list". :D
i can think of a few others that could be placed there above nem :rofl
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #111 on: July 07, 2010, 08:59:26 PM »
Well hitech, I personally don't feel that the number of guns from one bomber firing on the same target is part of its preformance. However, I don't have the authority to make that call.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #112 on: July 07, 2010, 09:02:27 PM »
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3873
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #113 on: July 07, 2010, 09:06:23 PM »
Nemisis, stop just stop.


 :lol
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4021
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #114 on: July 07, 2010, 09:26:19 PM »
It's one of those "even though I've been proven wrong, I am right" threads.
Former C.O. 91st Bombardment Group (Heavy)
"The Ragged Irregulars"

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #115 on: July 07, 2010, 09:54:07 PM »
Well hitech, I personally don't feel that the number of guns from one bomber firing on the same target is part of its preformance. However, I don't have the authority to make that call.


When you've been schooled and proven wrong, it's smart to just walk away, hopefully a little bit wiser.  Sadly, don't think it's gonna happen.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline USRanger

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10325
      • BoP Home
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #116 on: July 07, 2010, 09:57:06 PM »


Axis vs Allies Staff Member
☩ JG11 Sonderstaffel ☩
Flying 'Black[Death] 10' ☩JG11☩

Only the Proud, Only the Strong Ne Desit Virtus

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12320
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #117 on: July 07, 2010, 10:48:00 PM »
Well hitech, I personally don't feel that the number of guns from one bomber firing on the same target is part of its preformance. However, I don't have the authority to make that call.

Let analyze again your totally naive statement.

Take the B17 as an example.

1. We model accurate muzzle velocities.
2. We model accurate bullet coefficients.
3. We model wind.
4. We model atmospheric density  with altitude on the bullets.
5. We model the angles at which the guns can traverse.
6. On turret mounts we model traverse rates.
7. We model gravity accurately.
8. We model the dispersions do to gun mounts and barrel inaccuracies.

Now I choose not to model moronic gunners as you wish who would not all fire on the same plane when only one plane is attacking a formation. But if you wish I could adjust the gunners IQ to your level when you are flying a bomber, so most would just not fire when being attacked , because by golly it's just to hard for that 109 to kill us if we fight back.

HiTech


Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #118 on: July 07, 2010, 10:54:57 PM »
Let analyze again your totally naive statement.

Take the B17 as an example.

1. We model accurate muzzle velocities.
2. We model accurate bullet coefficients.
3. We model wind.
4. We model atmospheric density  with altitude on the bullets.
5. We model the angles at which the guns can traverse.
6. On turret mounts we model traverse rates.
7. We model gravity accurately.
8. We model the dispersions do to gun mounts and barrel inaccuracies.

Now I choose not to model moronic gunners as you wish who would not all fire on the same plane when only one plane is attacking a formation. But if you wish I could adjust the gunners IQ to your level when you are flying a bomber, so most would just not fire when being attacked , because by golly it's just to hard for that 109 to kill us if we fight back.

HiTech



I would like to interject some of my fanboi-ism by saying, You're my hero.

 :salute


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: bomber guns.....
« Reply #119 on: July 07, 2010, 10:55:48 PM »
I'd suggest Cragenmore Scotch Nemisis.  Probably about a case, addressed to Hitech Creations in Grapevine Texas.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2010, 11:04:12 PM by Guppy35 »
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters