I agree with Ink in a manner.
When you chose to divide something by giving it a name: In order to control and harness it, it has a very specific meaning at that instant.
Although the meaning can diminish over time due to loss of information and mis-interpretation through interference, it is still completely reliant on the ability to be measured. In fact, if it couldn't be mis-interpreted it would not of had a "true" form to exist with in the first place.
As well if it could not be seen as "levels of honour" ALA: military medals/etc, it wouldn't be concrete and thus never existed.
This is not a discussion of wether interpretations of honour are "right" or "wrong" its a manner of throwing away personal agendas and admitting to yourself where you truely stand. Do you try to be honourable, or do you not?
The worst thing in the world is someone who says they are non-violent but uses all other means to express said voilence instead, because in the end; it has the same effect.
Unfortunately when names and concepts are concerned, its all about absolutes. Thats why its best to avoid them (if you can).
Lets be honest then?