« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: B-25J Mitchell  (Read 2968 times)

Offline AceHavok

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 510
B-25J Mitchell
« on: December 15, 2011, 06:08:01 PM »
Posted a thread about this a month or two ago. Thought I'd revise the thread.  

Anyways, over 4,000 B-25Js were built during the course of the war. It has a great combat record and it has a tail gunner unlike it's sister the B-25C.  I really do think the B-25J will be used a lot in the Main Arenas possibly as much as the B-26. I for one would use it a lot. :)

Thanks for your consideration,

Warthog

NOTE: I am wishing for the Glass nose and the strafer version of the B-25J.
« Last Edit: December 15, 2011, 06:11:10 PM by AceHavok »
Logged
Currently inactive.


Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. - Albert Einstein

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2011, 06:10:32 PM »
+1
Logged

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2011, 06:30:32 PM »
I would love to see this, B-25C having no tail gun really doesn't interest me, and B-25H doesn't have a formation option due to the 75mm (attack version).

Surprised we didn't get the B25J.
Logged
JG 52

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2011, 06:32:12 PM »
+1

I love my B25C but the lack of tail guns really bites me in the butt a lot of times.  :D The 25J would be tons-o-fun.
Logged
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline FBCrabby

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
      • AHFreebirds.com
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2011, 06:37:23 PM »
+1

I bet the B25J has been on the to-do list for a while though - but do we need more American bombers?  :headscratch:
Logged
AH-Freebirds.com - FB$ - Proud Squadron Of Aces High II

Actively Recruiting! - Join FB$ Today!

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2011, 06:41:09 PM »
Quote from: FBCrabby on December 15, 2011, 06:37:23 PM
+1

I bet the B25J has been on the to-do list for a while though - but do we need more American bombers?  :headscratch:

My usual answer would be "no, we do not" - but in this case, a bombsight + tail-gunner version would transform the 25 (not H) from an almost hangar queen into a much more usable medium bomber. So no objections by me ;)
Logged
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline AceHavok

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 510
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2011, 06:43:30 PM »
Quote from: FBCrabby on December 15, 2011, 06:37:23 PM
+1

I bet the B25J has been on the to-do list for a while though - but do we need more American bombers?  :headscratch:

It could possibly be added when the B-26 has a graphical update, I'm no graphics designer and I'm not sure if they could use the B-25C/H for a reference for the B-25J.
Logged
Currently inactive.


Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. - Albert Einstein

Offline 1sum41

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 835
      • devil dog squadron
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2011, 10:13:14 PM »
I would LOVE to see the B25-J in game +100
(maybe add the PBJ1J as well :pray)
Logged

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2011, 10:48:09 PM »
I get my He-111, you get your B-25J.  It's win/win!  Especially for me since both are bombers. :x
Logged
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline AceHavok

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 510
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2011, 01:11:10 AM »
Quote from: Lusche on December 15, 2011, 06:41:09 PM
My usual answer would be "no, we do not" - but in this case, a bombsight + tail-gunner version would transform the 25 (not H) from an almost hangar queen into a much more usable medium bomber. So no objections by me ;)


 :)
Logged
Currently inactive.


Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. - Albert Einstein

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2011, 02:30:21 AM »
Quote from: Volron on December 15, 2011, 10:48:09 PM
I get my He-111, you get your B-25J.  It's win/win!  Especially for me since both are bombers. :x

Best possible scenario, and been hoping for it for a while. B-25J, Beaufighter, and He-111 in one release. However I don't think it will happen because no release will ever be as awesome.
Logged

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2011, 05:36:26 AM »
+1
Logged
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline SoonerMP

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 413
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2011, 08:47:46 AM »
Yes. Pretty please yes. 
Logged

S.A.P.P. Secret Association of P-38 Pilots

Blame Karaya 2008-2012       Death From Above - MA (inactive)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #13 on: December 16, 2011, 09:29:22 AM »
B-25J would be a good addition, in my opinion.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline 4Prop

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 647
Re: B-25J Mitchell
« Reply #14 on: December 16, 2011, 10:21:40 AM »
+1
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »