Science starts with the scientific method.
1. Observation- wow, I see 10 contrails across the sky sprayed in one hour but not the others and stay there for 8 hours, not during the rest of week with the same temperature and same sunny day light.
2. Hypothisis - why are there 10 contrails across the sky during one hour but not the others for the rest of the day or week with the same temperature and same sunny day light?
Then we get to the testing phase which is tough for this.
Then we can come to our own conclusions based on testing.
I am observing and hypothisizing. They don't look like normal 1 miles contrials. I have pics of 2 different contrials in the same air space at the same time. 1 normal, 1 20 miles long. They haze the sky all day. The next day, no trials, same temp, same sunny day. Gee, Did the atmosphere completely change??? Nah...
Asking questions doesn't make me a conspiracy theorist. It makes me a concerned citizen.
Look up the studies on coal ash. Look up increasing barium and aluminum by PPM in Forest. All drastically increasing as the heavy metals float down all over the place. They spread out as they fall because they don't break down. These are completely different than a 1 mile trial. 100% totally different.
The one thing you are missing is facts. Do an ernest study of contrails and how they are formed. Study the actual winds aloft and associated temperatures in your area or any area you choose. Have an open mind, gather facts, and learn about the subject.
Your scientific observations are flawed because you don’t gather associated facts. Your hypothesis is also flawed because it too, isn’t based on fact but, your belief.
