And why did the UN do this? Because THE WORLD finally recognised the need after the Second World War.
Hmmm...and this contradicts my point about the UN creating Israel in what way exactly?
The US condemed it because it was thought to be a massacre of hundreds, as "reported" by Arafats spin doctors.
Rubbish. The US condemned it because it can see
exactly where this thing is going to lead. It was simply the next installment in the circle of violence. Israel goes in hard and is satisfied it has smited its enemies. Palestinian suicide bombers are recruited in greater numbers. Another bombing. More Israeli retaliation. More suicide bombers. More Israeli retaliation. More suicide bombers. More Israeli retaliation.
Ad nauseum and infinatum.
Surely this is the most obvious thing in the world?
Clearly the Palestinians can't count. What makes you think the UN can do any better?
So the Palestinians are biased. All the more reason to go outside the region (that means above the Israelis too) and use a global body like the... err... the UN!
Fancy that!
Becuase the Palestininans have rejected "out of hand" every offer that they have been given.
Read Nashwan's posts on the most recent (and best) offer afforded by the Israelis. Even a cursory glance shows how unacceptable the offer was to anyone wanting self-determination. You wouldn't accept it. I wouldn't accept it. Why should the Palestinians?
...and certain elements in their support base will simply not give in until Israel is destroyed.
That's true. But there are certain elements in Northen Ireland that would want every Protestant or Catholic crucified, but strangely you don't tend to see that sort of thing happening.
There are radicals in every ethnic group. But the majority tends to just get on with their lives, and provided they have the means to do that, they will. Radicals get support in times of hardship and suffering - the rise of Hitler is testament to that.
Give the Palestinians something approaching self-determination (including control of natural resources like water - something not allowed in the last peace deal), and the radicals will return to the fringe.
The use of this term is sickening in refernce to Israel. It is both unfair and frankly disgusting. That term was used to justify the Nazi invasion of Eastern Europe...
I think it is spot on.
Lebensraum:
"Meaning "living space," it was a basic principle of Nazi foreign policy. Hitler believed that eastern Europe had to be conquered to create a vast German empire for more physical space, a greater population, and new territory to supply food and raw materials. "Implant Israel into the equation and I think it fits very well.
...and it's use here is simply a blantant attempt to antagonise. [
And you complain of this, given the nature of the thread and Udie's comments all the way through. lol!