Based on your lack of understanding of the English language, let me clarify-
Your disdain of the Spits makes no sense to me primarily because you
are so successful against them. I could see the point if they were unbalancing from the standpoint of being untouchable. Fact is, they aren't.
So, what's left? Boredom? Possibly, but so many of your arguments are not based on the boredom of seeing them, rather the unfair advantages you perceive in them. Sorry, those are two separate issues. If you then argue there are so many of them because they have an unfair advantage, then how are you so successful against them?
...oh, what AKSWulfe said.
Now you are not content with calling for the Spit to be perked. Now it is also Yaks, La7s, and Nikkis. You have commented on how near perkable the F6F is. You have made comments regarding the P51. But... where do we hear comments about how good the Fw's are? I think all of the above listed planes are great, including the Fw's, and I believe they are mostly balanced, certainly not anything worthy of upsetting the applecart as you suggest with your ridiculous "Perk all the Spits, even the Mk I" arguments. Quite frankly it's the most inane campaign I have ever seen conducted by a single person.
So, for a simple American like myself, explain to me what your dream arena would look like, and please, outline your perception of where the Fw's in particular fit. You see, I can't imagine how a two planes (the 190D9 and 190A5) could enjoy any more success than they currently do under any other system- except one that totally eliminates all possible competitors.
And BTW, if you call for the perking of the Spit I, you are a total wuss in almost anyone's book.