Author Topic: calling fellow brits (Read 2531 times)

muckmaw · « **Reply #75 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:14:00 PM »

Let's check the scoreboard, shall we?

Top Secret Agent:
US----------------------UK
Austin Powers---------James Bond
Edge: UK

National Snackfood
Twinkies------------Tea and Crumpets
Edge: US

Ugliest National Figure:
Hillary Clinton-------Prince Charles
Edge: Tie

National Scourge
Rednecks-------------Dental Hygiene
Edge: UK

Most Sought after export:
Denim Jeans------------Liz Hurley
Edge: UK

Senile Political Figure
Ronald Reagan----------Margaret Thatcher
Edge: US

Serial Killer:
Jeffery Dahmer----------Jack the Ripper
Edge: US

Violent Sport (deaths per event)
Boxing-----------------Soccer (Football)
Edge: UK

Low point of Society
Bill Clinton----------Teletubbies
Edge: US

Wrath of God
Tornadoes, Earthquakes-----Cold and Wet
Hurricanes, Race Riots
Los Angeles
Edge: US

The Good Old US of A bashes the motherland by a score of 5-4!

I think this settles this debate!

[ 12-28-2001: Message edited by: Muck ]

vmfRazor · « **Reply #76 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:26:00 PM »

I read an article one time written by an American pilot in the "I geuss you'd call it trade program" American serviceman in the RAF while Brit aerviceman in the USAAF in his place. He stated that Brits would do low level attack runs at 50 ft in training while USA forces wouldn't go below 200 FT my hats off to those nuts

RazorDD

Tjay · « **Reply #77 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:26:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Muck:
I'm curious. How do the Brits feel about us Yanks?

Honestly. This isn't a "my country is better than yours" post.

From a purely educational standpoint, I would like to know what the people of the UK think of their bastard child, the USA.

PS. Yep, you still got the Faulklands. You worry about them, we'll handle the rest of the world.

You'll find just about every opinion possible. Just as you can find every possible opinion about UK/England in the States.
Personally, I think you are doing rather well considering you've only just started!

Tjay · « **Reply #78 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:38:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by vmfRazor:
I read an article one time written by an American pilot in the "I geuss you'd call it trade program" American serviceman in the RAF while Brit aerviceman in the USAAF in his place. He stated that Brits would do low level attack runs at 50 ft in training while USA forces wouldn't go below 200 FT my hats off to those nuts

There's a story about a B17 briefing during WWII that goes like this:
Bomb Group C.O: 'Bomb runs are scheduled for 30,000ft but as this is a priority target I will see that every man of every crew that bombs from 25,000ft gets a career citation. Any one who bombs from 20,000ft will get the DSC. Anyone crazy enough to bomb from 15,000ft will get a guaranteed Purple Heart. But now lower than that men - or you'll get all tangled up with the RAF.
RazorDD

[ 12-28-2001: Message edited by: Tjay ]

BenDover · « **Reply #79 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:42:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Muck:
Now I'm starting feel like you guys are more like the French; Fair weather friends.

you mind,thats one of the biggest insults to brits

FlyingDuckSittingSwan · « **Reply #80 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:42:00 PM »

Yeah exactly. The Tornado was designed as a low-level attack and double-ups as a very weak fighter. If it didn't double up as a very weak fighter, it would have meant we didn;t have any fighters for many years...fancy that. About Iraq...anyone remember when the Panavia Tornado had a prob because the Durandel's wouldn't fit on the underside and that was the main mission of the Tornado? How ridiculous. I hate that plane. By the way, the F-111 became the F-14...not many people know that. They tried getting the F-111 onto the carriers and saw they didn;t have enough power so they made the F-14. It cost an Admiral's job and his callsign was "tomcat" hence the planes name.

I'm reading Tom Clancy's "CARRIER".

Excellent book!

Swoop...I think that the difference between the Brits and the French is that the Brits are proud but realise they're not a superpower (anymore). The French are proud and think they are a superpower (even thought they never were). Which is sillier...cos they eat frogs and snails.
I haven't read Andy McNabb's book yet but I have read bits of it. Isn;t it about the missions to get Sadam's scuds and they were captured? I also read that in fact the SAS missions to get the scuds was a total failure as only 2 per cent were shot down thanks to the SAS insertion missions.
The trouble with the SAS is that they try to be everything. They do hostage rescue. They try to do incursions...etc. The yanks are lucky, cos they have their SEALS and Delta force for hostage rescue. They have their Rangers for incursions (light infantry). WE have the Royal Marines which aren't exactly light infantry cos they carry a house when they go in missions.

Sorry, I'm just a fan of the US military.

Revvin · « **Reply #81 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:44:00 PM »

Hehe touche Nifty but proper football rules are easier to understand, its when you start picking it up and have time out its gets complicated

Quote

Ugliest National Figure:
Hillary Clinton-------Prince Charles
Edge: Tie

I'd like to call a point of order here please! you did'nt let us field our star player....Prince Charles bit of stuff Camilla Parker-Bowles and I'd like to also motion another round based on most ridiculous loss of sense...the day Prince Charles looked at Diana, then looked at Camilla and decided to have Camilla!!! WTF!!!
Here's a picture of her 'with her face on' god knows Charles must have a strong stomach to see her first thing with no make-up.

FlyingDuckSittingSwan · « **Reply #82 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:48:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by vmfRazor:
I read an article one time written by an American pilot in the "I geuss you'd call it trade program" American serviceman in the RAF while Brit aerviceman in the USAAF in his place. He stated that Brits would do low level attack runs at 50 ft in training while USA forces wouldn't go below 200 FT my hats off to those nuts

RazorDD

It's called "nap of the earth" or something like that. There is special equipment fitted on low level bombers to do this. Maybe you were comparing a Tornado where it is fitted and maybe something like an F-16 which it isn't. Not really fair...

[ 12-28-2001: Message edited by: FlyingDuckSittingSwan ]

Joc · « **Reply #83 on:** December 28, 2001, 02:50:00 PM »

ROFL Revvin MAKE IT GO AWAY! MAKE IT GO AWAY! lol

FlyingDuckSittingSwan · « **Reply #84 on:** December 28, 2001, 03:02:00 PM »

She isn't that bad....

..when you had a few pints...

Krusher · « **Reply #85 on:** December 28, 2001, 03:26:00 PM »

Soccer vs Football

well if you brits have anything on the sidelines that looks like this, we will talk

for more ---->
http://www.dallascowboys.com/cgi-bin/Cowboys/cheerleaders/calendar.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@0125482326.1009575004@@@@&BV_EngineID=eadcclhjekgdbedchecjcff.0

BenDover · « **Reply #86 on:** December 28, 2001, 03:28:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Muck:

National Snackfood
Twinkies------------Tea and Crumpets
Edge: US

Wrath of God
Tornadoes, Earthquakes-----Cold and Wet
Hurricanes, Race Riots
Los Angeles
Edge: US

no one eats tea and crumpets as a snack,
1. they take to long to be considored a 'snack'
2. you have to stand and watch over them as they cook.

i'd like to say a cadbury's crunchie as the snack

bet we have worst riots than you, one instance happened in my home town of Bradford, where the NF (national front) did a peaceful rally (btw they are nazis), but it was Asians who started rioting, they parked cars up at the exits of buildings, burned 'em out, then set the buildings on fire.

btw swoop, which part of the UK do you come from?

BenDover · « **Reply #87 on:** December 28, 2001, 03:31:00 PM »

oh yeah, theres one thing you yanks can't match us on, mounty pyphon, need i say more, ok, "tis merly a flesh wound"

Revvin · « **Reply #88 on:** December 28, 2001, 03:34:00 PM »

Joc> Nope it stays until we at least call it a draw, those are my terms and be warned I have more and am not afraid to use them!

hazed- · « **Reply #89 on:** December 28, 2001, 04:07:00 PM »

FDS you are no brit if you rate the US special forces above ours.

I dont beleive you are british.

as for navy seaals/rangers/delta force why dont you check their record of mission failures?
The british train armies all around the world becaue they are the best.The SAS have a fantastic record for successfull missions and even the failures are stories to tell the grandchildren!
Thats the point, With the Iraq scud hunts even in a balls up they put up a fantastic fight.They killed a rediculous number of iraqis (from memory 127 killed? ) and were captured and tortured for days without breaking.Thats the sort of thing that makes the brits proud.Never give in , never surrender.

(sound of pipes playing)I suggest you get that union jack get a cold beer sit and watch the bravo 2 zero video (shaun bean)and that discovery programme on the US screw ups in panama and rethink your 'best special forces' opinion

PS while your at it check out the S.B.S (special boat service) generally regarded as harder to get into than the SAS!!
then take a look at the Australian SAS's operations.

pps Israel has a pretty good anti terrorist squad too (though they tend to be pretty violent and have lost hostages) but they are truelly bad news if you happen to be the terrorist

where are the 'great' US missions?

I know to you yanks think it sounds like arrogance but its not really its blinkered loyalty

yanks hate us for it but hell without it we would be french (spit) for gods sake!

]

[ 12-28-2001: Message edited by: hazed- ]