This on? *tap* *tap*
<---dodges wet tomatoes with black mold on them
HEY! HEY! Gimme a chance willya????
This has been an interesting thread. Vitriol and all, it really has.
To those of you debating the price:
1) I don't think $30/month is too much to ask for *anyone* to pay for unlimited flight simming and a high-fidelity model.
2) Be careful what you ask for; WB allowed an EZ Mode Arena, subsidized to the tune of $9.95/month splinter the membership, and draw in a whole subclass that value fun WAY over sim fidelity, and it's growing like a cancerous tumor. Keep your standards HIGH, and just accept the fact that you can't have *everybody and their dog* playing, and still have Aces High quality. You just can't. Below a certain $ amount lies base Quake dweebery. This is bad for those who really are dedicated but can't afford $30/month, I know, but there it is.
As to my take on WB vs. AH? Well, I still like WB better, but I'm sure there's some truth to what Ripsnort says about "change vs. ego". However, if I *really* felt AH was flat out superior, I would just take it on the chin and move over, especially at $30/month. Right now, my biggest barring factors are the FM (we'll re-evaluate when 1.4 comes out), the "recruit level" blackouts, the catering to Late War ueberplanes, and the stale Chesspiece arena model. The new terrain editor could change the latter REAL quick, and that's exciting.
But, I agree with many over at WB that still say that AH fell short of the mark when it neglected to do "something wonderful" and change the gameplay. Throw out the rancid Arena concept and start over.
The ground war model...? Uh, no, that wasn't the answer. That's an embarassment, and an insult to high-fidelity simming.
I bet if AH were to up the ante on "how the sim is played", and did it right, whatever that was, then you might have a stampede of ex-WBers coming over here.